Fintech
LendingPoint Gets Increase in Financing
June 28, 2018
LendingPoint announced today that it closed an increase of its mezzanine financing, bringing the total of the facility from Paragon Outcomes Management to $52.5 million. Mezzanine financing is a hybrid of debt and equity financing. Paragon and LendingPoint initiated a relationship with its first credit facility in January 2017 for $20 million. It was then upsized seven months later, and has now been upsized for the second time to $52.5 million.
“We believe this shows a tremendous amount of confidence in the way our portfolio continues to perform,” LendingPoint Chief Marketing Officer Mark Lorimer told deBanked. “It’s a great vote of confidence.”
Among other things, the new credit facility provides an increased advance rate for more efficient equity usage. Today’s announcement comes on the heels of more than a billion dollars worth of senior credit financing that LendingPoint has closed in less than a year. The company secured an up to $500 million senior credit facility in August 2017 and an up to $600 million senior credit facility last month, both arranged by Guggenheim Securities.
“[Paragon’s] support has been critical as we grow our origination volume and balance sheet, and march towards profitability next year,” said Tom Burnside, LendingPoint co-founder and CEO. “We’re proud that LendingPoint’s performance to date means companies like Paragon Outcomes want to be part of our future.”
In March, LendingPoint debuted a point of sale lending platform for merchants that Lorimer said is going well.
“We’re continuing to build it out, add more merchants to the platform and increase the funding levels,” Lorimer said.
Founded in 2014 and based in Kennesaw, GA, LendingPoint and its Merchant Solutions platform have originated more than 70,000 loans totaling more than $500 million.
New York Institute of Credit Celebrates 100 Years and Honors Harvey Gross
June 12, 2018
About 300 people gathered underneath the soaring ceilings of Guastavino’s ballroom in Manhattan last night to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the New York Institute of Credit (NYIC). Most attendees were members of the association, which provides networking opportunities and education to a myriad of constituents, including factors, financial advisors, lawyers, investors and accountants.
“[NYIC] is one of the few meeting places that brings judges, investors and professionals together,” said Jack Butler, CEO of Birch Lake, a boutique merchant bank based in Chicago.
In addition to Butler, other members, like Maxwell Cohen, traveled to attend to event. Cohen works in Fort Lauderdale, FL as Managing Partner for Corporate Strategy & Financial Consulting LLC and specializes in underwriting and brokering business loans.
“[NYIC] is great because it connects people in similar sandboxes…and sometimes we can build off each other’s strengths, ” Cohen said. “Everyone here is verified [and] if you’re here, we know you have capabilities to deliver.”
A central part the NYIC centennial celebration was the honoring of the organization’s Executive Director, Harvey Gross, who has worked for organization for 54 years.
A montage video of congratulations to Gross included praises from New York judges and others, including:
“He has a way of putting people together that produces spectacular results.”
“He’s been a mentor to so many.”
“Harvey has communicated best practices.”
“Some organizations looks inward. NYIC looks outward, because of Harvey’s leadership.”
“To talk about 54 years in five minutes is not easy, but I will try,” Gross said to the audience upon receiving the award. He explained that when he was 12 years old, his brother suggested that he get into the factoring business. He later told deBanked that he spent the next five or so years learning the business and left school by the time he was 18 to start a career in factoring. When he started working for the NYIC, the organization primarily served the factoring business, and has since expanded.
“I think tonight showed that the NYIC went through a lot of transitions over the last 100 years,” Gross told deBanked. “And we’re excited about new transitions in the next 100 years. And that includes MCA and fintech.”
Square Funded $339M to SMBs in Q1
May 2, 2018
Square’s small business funding arm, Square Capital, made over 50,000 business loans for a total of $339 million in Q1, according to the company’s latest earnings report. That figure is a 35% increase year-over-year and puts them on pace to break last year’s $1.177B total. OnDeck, by comparison, who is arguably their top rival, made $2.11B in business loans last year.
“[..] they just don’t have another way to get access to that sort of capital. And when they get it, they invest in their business,” Square CFO Sarah Friar, said of their merchants during the earnings call. “They’re buying inventory, they’re hiring new employees, they may be taking any lease hold and opening that second location. And when they do that, their business grows and hence our business grows. So, we still think we have a unique product that no one else can really follow us into.”
Square also earned $34 million in revenue from bitcoin, thanks to the Cash App they launched in January that allows users to buy and sell bitcoin. Bitcoin was mentioned an eye-opening 37 times in their quarterly shareholder letter, while their loan program is only referenced 7 times.
Overall, the company brought in $669 million in revenue and recorded a $24 million loss. They also entered into an agreement to buy Weebly, a company that helps people build professional websites and online stores.
“Weebly will expand Square’s customer base globally and add a new recurring revenue stream. Weebly has millions of customers and more than 625,000 paid subscribers,” the company wrote.
Chris Larsen on Crypto, Ripple, and ICOs
April 24, 2018
At LendIt Fintech, Ripple co-founder and Chairman Chris Larsen got real in his on-stage conversation with Jo Ann Barefoot. This is what you missed:
I think this is a fundamental shift in fintech and what we believe the big thing happening here is the development of a second internet. We call it the internet of value so that value, money, assets will begin moving as quickly and efficiently as data has been moving for the last 25 years
Using SWIFT is like sending a letter. You know, when drop it in the mailbox, you have no idea where it is, if it got there or not. So, getting away from that I think is profound. And what we would say is that, you know, a lot of the backlash from globalization today, it’s not because globalization is bad. It’s essential. It’s that it’s incomplete because globalization needs kind of 3 key systems to be working together and it needs interoperability and data.
I think all new technologies start with a, you know, screw the government, disruption, tear everything down. So, I think that’s natural and then, you know, the internet started that way too and then it has to sort of grow up. And particularly, it’s solving real world problems. Real world problems are always more complicated than that. And then when you switch to finance, this is different. Right? You know, the internet was mostly technology. Mostly. It’s just now kind of crashing into regulatory issues.
I think on some of the other things like ICOs, we’re pretty anti-ICO. I think it’s a bad thing to get involved with from the founder’s perspective because, you know, if you’re a founder and you can raise money many ways today, do you really want to do something where you’re going to have the SEC, you know, kind of threat hanging over your head for 10 years with strict liability? You just don’t want that. You know, that’s a problem.
[..]From building currencies, digital assets, ICOs typically say, “Okay. There’s a currency for this use case and none other.” That’s kind of the opposite of the way it should go. Currencies need to be as liquid as possible. And so, they’re going to have as many use cases as possible. For XRP for example, the kind of early beachhead has been cross border payments, but we see that as just the beginning of something that really has a multitude of use cases. To get as liquid as possible, that’s what drives utility and value at the end of the day. So, I think in all fronts ICOs are problematic and that’s why you’re seeing the regulators crack down on them, not everywhere, but I think they’ll be transformed. They’ll probably look like, you know, IPOs at the end of the day.
Harvesting Inc Uses AI to Assess Credit Risk for Farm Lenders
April 12, 2018
This week, Silicon Valley-based Harvesting Inc launched an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-backed platform that uses satellite images of farms to gauge credit risk for banks that lend to farmers.
The technology can be used to capture data on farms in the developing world as well as in mature markets like the US. Harvesting Inc generates “credit scorecards” using satellite imagery of farms and other data points, already in the works in the African market.
“Think of us as someone who calculates the language of agriculture [into] the language of finance,” Garg said.
Garg told deBanked that because small farmers in emerging markets don’t have credit cards, let alone smartphones, they have no credit history and their creditworthiness can’t be evaluated through a traditional Western banking system. That’s where Harvesting Inc comes in. It evaluates a farmer’s asset (his or her farm) in a completely objective way – through satellite images of the crops and by using historical data about past seasons.
Using satellites to assess farms is not brand new. However, Garg said that satellite data has typically been used by farmers in developed countries to see more clearly how their crops are performing. Harvesting Inc’s use of satellite data is meant to better inform lenders (mostly national and regional banks in developing countries) about the farms they have lended to or are considering lending to. In many countries, national banks are required to make loans to farmers. Garg said that in India national banks must have 18 percent of their loans assigned to agriculture.
Harvesting Inc is not a lender. Instead, it sells its credit risk technology mostly to banks in emerging markets. However, Garg told deBanked that some American banks have approached him with interest in their new AI product.
“Banks have processes today,” Garg said, “but we believe [our AI technology] will be able to provide faster and more accurate data.”
Harvesting Inc was founded by Garg in 2016 and has 12 employees. The primary office is in Silicon Valley, with another office in Bangalore, India.
LendItFintech In Photos and Sound Bites
April 10, 2018
when speaking about the increase in mortality rate for people who have faced major financial distress
when interviewed by Jo Ann Barefoot
When asked by Bloomberg Technology reporter Emily Chang if Goldman Sachs would be considered a competitor
when interviewed by Lendio’s Brock Blake
When asked who will win the race for marketshare
When asked if it’s harder to underwrite loans above $50,000
talks business at the company booth
Below: Ocrolus account executive John Lowenthal stands in front of the company booth
Peer IQ Insights for Q1 2018
March 30, 2018Peer IQ released its 2018 first quarter “Lending Earnings Insights,” which analyzes lender performance with a focus on credit performance trends. They analyze data across three main lender segments: Fintechs and Non-banks, Large banks, and Card issuers. Below are some highlights from Peer IQ’s analysis on this year’s first quarter:
Credit re-normalization continues
“Credit re-normalization continues across all major lending groups. Credit performance this quarter is mixed. We observe improvements, and record low delinquencies from ONDK, OMF, and FinTechs in particular. LendingClub expects 31 bps lower charge-offs going forward due to tighter credit standards. At Discover – a bellwether for personal loan performance – the net charge off rate jumped 92 bps YOY to 3.62% – the largest increase in several years.
Card issuers
“Card issuers are increasing loan loss reserves at a higher rate than loan growth, indicating expectations of higher losses going forward. American Express increased loan loss provisions 33% although loan growth was only 14%.”
Banks and FinTech
“Bank FinTech partnerships, and M&A continues. Banks are either partnering with FinTechs or investing in beefing up their technology capabilities in payments, lending, digital banking and wealth management. Banks like JP are partnering with Amazon by rolling out co-branded checking accounts and credit cards. A specter is haunting financial services – the specter of Amazon.”
Lenders Pass the Buck on to Borrowers
“Lenders are taking actions to pass rising rates on to borrowers to protect margins and investor returns. Lenders are also trying to reduce all-in funding costs by reducing the credit spreads on their securitizations.”
A Dialogue with Peter Renton: Cryptocurrency and Beyond
March 2, 2018
deBanked Magazine recently caught up with Peter Renton, founder of Lend Academy, a leading educational resource for the marketplace industry. Through his writing, podcasts and video courses, he’s been helping multitudes of people better understand the industry since 2010. Renton is also the co-founder of LendIt, one of the world’s largest fintech conventions, which recently branched out beyond its marketplace lending focus to include other types of fintech. The flagship U.S. conference will take place April 9 through April 11 in San Francisco. The following is an edited transcript of our discussions.
deBanked: Why did you decide to rebrand LendIt as LendItFintech?
Renton: The main reason is that we have moved beyond the online lending space. While it’s still the core of what we do, it’s not all of what we do anymore. Many of the large online lenders have also moved beyond online lending. Lending is part of financial services, but our attendees want to know what else is important. Our attendees also want to look at other opportunities for expansion. They want to know how other areas of fintech are going to affect their business—topics such as blockchain and digital banking. LendItFintech tells people that lending is what we focus on, but it also makes clear that we’re about more than lending.
deBanked: In addition to your marketplace lending investments, you entered into the cryptocurrency space back in early 2015. Tell us what you’re doing now with respect to cryptocurrency?
Renton: This was not something that I spent much time thinking about back then. At the time, I expected bitcoin to never amount to anything. But I’m interested in financial innovation and I decided to give it a go. I never thought in my wildest dreams that it would get to $10,000. (Editor’s note: In 2017, bitcoin climbed to nearly $20,000; in early February it fell below $8,000 for the first time since Nov. 2017)
I opened up a Coinbase account with $2,000, which got me 10 bitcoins. I have since sold a portion of it gradually as the price of bitcoin went up, and I diversified into a handful of other coins as well. I have recently moved a significant portion of my investment into a privately managed cryptocurrency fund, and I still maintain my Coinbase account too.
deBanked: How are things different now than when you first entered the digital currency market?
Renton: In January 2015, I created my bitcoin account and I don’t think I ever logged in over the next 18 months, or if I did, it was maybe just once or twice. No one was talking about bitcoin back then. It was still on the fringe of fintech. Sure, there were some people focused on it, but it wasn’t part of mainstream media coverage. Then, all of a sudden, it became hot because people love get-rich-quick schemes and hearing about people who hit the big time from nothing. These stories really fuel people’s imagination. Then suddenly bitcoin became one of the biggest phenomena of 2017; no one would have predicted a few years ago that would happen.
deBanked: What are the biggest risks you see with cryptocurrency today and how can investors best overcome these challenges?
Renton: Many people are buying purely on speculation with no thought that bitcoin could go down in price. You hear of people buying bitcoin on their credit card and paying 20 percent interest on that purchase. It’s insane. I feel that cryptocurrencies are here to stay, but I don’t like that they have these massive 20 percent to 30 percent swings in a day. The speculators have helped drive the price up, but they’ve also driven the volatility up and that’s been a bad thing.
deBanked: Do you think cryptocurrency will ever dethrone cash? If so, what will it take to get to that point?
Renton: I feel that some kind of digital currency is inevitable—but whether it’s a Federal Reserve-backed currency or something else remains to be seen. I have an 11-year-old and a 9-year-old and I am confident that at some point in their lifetime there will be no such thing as cash. In China, for example, there are some places where you can’t even use cash. You can go to a street vendor and buy a piece of fruit with your phone. Certainly in the U.S. we’re not there yet, but I think China shows where we are going to be.
Cryptocurrency is only one type of digital cash, and it’s hard to say how it will ultimately fit into the larger picture. To dethrone cash as we know it today, cryptocurrency needs to be a quick and efficient way of transacting, and right now it’s not quick and it’s not cheap.
That said, I believe there will be some kind of digital currency in the future. It will take a long time for the Federal Reserve to say cash is no longer legal tender, but I expect we’ll see some kind of digital currency in the next 10 years for sure.
deBanked: How do you think regulation will change the cryptocurrency landscape? Is it inevitable and, more importantly, do you think regulation of cryptocurrency is necessary to take it beyond the level it is today?
Renton: Right now bitcoin is not systemically important. At a market cap of around $156 billion in early February, if something happens and it completely crashes, it won’t make a dent on the U.S. or world economy. But if bitcoin continues to rise and reaches a market cap of say $16 trillion, and then it falls to zero, that would reverberate around the world. The largest economies that have the most bitcoin would be the most impacted.
At some point governments will step in with regulation. It’s already happening in places like China and South Korea and there are rumors of other governments taking action. I don’t think the largest governments will allow their economy to be at the whim of speculators.
deBanked:deBanked: How do you feel about the SEC stepping into regulate ICOs? Is this necessary to protect investors?
Renton: There are certainly some ICOs that are complete scams while others are obviously violating securities laws. But many ICOs have strong legal teams supporting them and are doing it right now. The SEC should absolutely clamp down on those doing the wrong thing, but my hope is that they don’t overreact and throw the baby out with the bathwater.
deBanked: What about online lending? The industry has gone through a lot of changes in its relatively short history. How do you expect to see the competitive landscape change in the next year or so? What about farther out?
Renton: The online lending space has gone through a lot of changes in its short history. I feel like the biggest trend we’re seeing right now is banks launching their own platforms. Take Goldman Sachs with the Marcus online lending platform, for example. More than anything else that has happened in the history of online lending that is among the most telling for the future, I think. Goldman has gone all in with this effort, and that move woke up all the large banks. Top banks like PNC and Barclays are also launching their own initiatives instead of partnering with others, which was surprising to me. I would have thought there would be more partnerships. There are still some, but several banks have decided to do it themselves rather than partnering. Smaller banks, however, that want to get into the space, will likely partner because they can’t afford to do it themselves. While we have seen a few partnerships develop, I expect we will see many more over the next couple of years.
deBanked: What do you see as the biggest risks for online lenders today? How can they best overcome these challenges?
Renton: As an industry, we have to focus on profitability. Profitability comes down primarily to two things. First, you have to get your cost of acquisition down. Some of the companies that failed recently were never able to get their costs of acquisition down to a manageable level. Underwriting is the second piece. Particularly if you’re a balance sheet lender and you’re not underwriting well, you can’t make money. The pullback in the industry in 2016 occurred because many of the major platforms got a little too aggressive in their underwriting. Investors are still paying for some of those mistakes.
Successful companies are ones that have figured out how to profitably acquire customers and how to underwrite effectively. Most of them have learned their lesson, but in business companies sometimes have short memories. We need to keep a close eye on it.
deBanked: What advice do you have for alternative lenders and funders?
Renton: In addition to paying careful attention to profitability and underwriting, another important piece is having diversified funding sources. You want to make sure that you don’t have one big bank or some other source providing 90 percent of your funding. You should really have different kinds of lending sources. Some loans you can fund through a marketplace, some loans you can fund through your balance sheet. It’s good when you’re not reliant on one particular way of funding your loans.
deBanked: How is regulation likely to impact the online lending industry?
Renton: Having support in Congress for the online lending space is important. Congress hasn’t devoted a lot of attention to it in the past few years, but it’s starting to. The Madden decision—which has the potential to lead to significant nationwide changes in consumer and commercial lending by non-bank entities—has created uncertainty in the industry. In states affected by the decision (Connecticut, New York and Vermont) already there has been less access to credit. I’m hopeful that Congress moves ahead with legislation to override the Madden decision that’s having such an impact in the Second Circuit states. People are worried that it could expand nationwide and Congress needs to act so there’s clarification. There’s too much uncertainty right now.
deBanked: Several platforms have closed their doors in the past year or so. Do you expect to see this trend continue?
Renton: There are companies out there still trying to raise money and struggling to do so. That’s a healthy thing for an industry. You want the strong players to survive and thrive and for the weaker ones to go away.
deBanked: How big do you think an online lender has to be to thrive?
Renton: There’s no doubt that scale is important. If you’re a small player, you have to have some kind of niche in order to acquire customers. If you have that, you have the ability to compete. Even with that sometimes, it’s going to be difficult. It’s a pretty complex business. You need to have a lot of staff for compliance and operations and that can be expensive. When you have high fixed costs, you have to have scale to be able to make a profit. That said, I think there’s room for more than just the ultra-large players in the online lending space. I think there will be plenty of opportunity for strong, well-positioned medium-sized players to compete.
deBanked: What about M&A in the industry?
Renton: Valuations at many of the large platforms are way down from where they were several years ago. As long as valuations stay depressed, I think we could see a big acquisition of a major platform this year. Some of these platforms have millions of customers. Having the ability to pick up such a large number of customers instantly through an acquisition could be compelling for the right buyer, such as a large bank.
deBanked: Is this a good time or a bad time to be an online lender in your opinion?
Renton: It is still a good time to be an online lender. We are expanding access to credit and making the world a better place. I have never been more excited about the industry than I am today.
