Banking
The Past, Present and Future of the ILC Bank
July 9, 2018Last Thursday, Square confirmed that it withdrew its application to the FDIC for depository insurance, which would allow it to take deposits from customers in all 50 states. The company said it plans to refile.
This is not the first time that a fintech company has withdrawn a bank application from the FDIC. Last October, SoFi withdrew its application in the wake of sexual harassment allegations against its then CEO Mike Cagney. SoFi has not explicitly stated that it plans to refile.
Regardless of the reason for withdrawing the application, this news revives the debate over whether fintech companies should be allowed to become banks in the first place – at least in the manner that Square and SoFi have sought to attain bank status. Both companies have submitted applications to the Utah Department of Financial Institutions to become Industrial Loan Company (ILC) banks.
This is controversial because ILC banks are not subject to the same regulations that other banks are. For instance, an ILC bank can engage in commercial activity outside of banking which could jeopardize the bank, critics contend. Under the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, which came in response to the Great Recession, there was a moratorium on establishing ILC banks because they were deemed to be a risk to the U.S. banking system. The moratorium was lifted in 2013.
Chris Cole, Senior Regulatory Counsel at Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA), a trade group, is a big opponent of ILC banks. He maintains that companies seeking to become ILC banks are simply taking advantage of an old policy that is no longer relevant. He explained that ILCs were created as banks for industrial workers in the early 1900s.
“They were meant to serve a certain type of industrial worker that had trouble finding a commercial bank they could bank with,” Cole said. “Now we don’t have that problem anymore. Industrial [or other lower paid] workers have plenty of opportunities to bank. This charter is completely outdated [and is] a loophole that should be closed so that the owners of these bank-like institutions are restricted in the same way that commercial banks are restricted.”
Last year, deBanked spoke to Richard Hunt, president and CEO of the Consumer Bankers Association, who echoed Cole with the regard to the initial purpose of ILC banks.
“No one envisioned when they wrote the ILC charter that we would have fintech companies that finance mortgages and student loans from private equity capital and not deposits. It’s a new world. Like with all rules and regulations, federal regulators should periodically review longstanding policy,” Hunt said.
Cole said that in addition to Square and SoFi, another fintech company recently applied to become an ILC bank. That company is NelNet, which services students loans, and it submitted an application to the FDIC less than two weeks ago.
So far, the FDIC has not approved of any ILC banks since Dodd-Frank. (There are only about 30 of them right now.) But that may soon change under the leadership of the agency’s new Chairman, Jelena McWilliams.
“I am hopeful that Jelena McWilliams will follow the same course as her predecessors have [and not issue ILC charters],” Cole said. “Issuing a moratorium is what I’d like to see.”
But McWilliams, who assumed the new role on June 5, may be more open to approving these applications than her predecessors. She said during a recent conference:
“The agency has a duty to the public to actually proceed [with the applications.] Now, that doesn’t mean that we will approve every application. That doesn’t mean that we will deny every application.”
American Express Partners with Amazon on SMB Credit Card
June 28, 2018American Express announced plans this week to partner with Amazon to introduce a co-branded Amazon credit card for small businesses. Amazon does have a co-branded card with J.P. Morgan Chase for consumers shopping on Amazon’s site, and elsewhere. But this would be Amazon’s first card for small business owners.
“At American Express, we have been helping business owners grow for more than 50 years and we know that millions of them rely on Amazon,” said Glenda McNeal, President of Enterprise Strategic Partnerships at American Express in a statement. “We’re delighted to expand our partnership with Amazon by offering a new cobranded small business card, and by also harnessing the collective insights and expertise of our companies to deliver tangible value to our mutual customers who use Amazon’s services.”
This was quite a win for American Express as J.P. Morgan was competing for this partnership as well, according to CNBC. This deal puts American Express in an enviable position to court more small business customers in its effort to become a leading lender to small and mid-sized companies. Small business cards can be very lucrative for banks. Compared to consumers who might spend a few thousand dollars a month on credit cards, businesses can spend up to hundreds of thousands of dollars in monthly bills, according to CNBC.
“We selected American Express as our partner for the upcoming small business credit card because of our shared commitment to helping small businesses grow,” said Max Bardon, Vice President at Amazon in a statement. “Offering the best of both brands, the cobranded small business credit card program will combine the buying power, convenience and value small businesses have come to know and love from Amazon backed by the world-class service, benefits, access and security of American Express.”
Amazon launched Amazon Lending in 2011 to help small businesses finance and sell more goods on its platform. From the 2011 launch to June 2017, Amazon Lending reported that it issued $3 billion across 20,000 business in the US, Japan, and the UK. And the bulk of the growth has been from small businesses in the US, where the company originated $1 billion in loans in 2017 alone. So small business lending, particularly in the US, is big business for Amazon.
This new co-branded Amazon/American Express card for small businesses is part of a series of new partnerships between the e-commerce behemoth and banks. In February of this year, it was reported that Amazon had partnered with Bank of America Merrill Lynch to provide loans to merchants (on an invitation-only basis) from $1,000 to $750,000.
HSBC Bank and SoftBank Robotics America Welcome “Pepper” the Robot
June 26, 2018A partnership between HSBC Bank and SoftBank Robotics America came to fruition this morning when a robot named Pepper was introduced to media at HSBC’s North American flagship retail branch on Fifth Avenue in midtown Manhattan.
“Thank you for joining us to make history today,” HSBC Head of Innovation Jeremy Balkin said at the flagship bank.
Pepper is the first robot to operate at a retail bank in North America, according to Julien Seret, VP of Global Product at SoftBank Robotics America. Pepper is four feet tall and can hear, speak and move its head to simulate eye contact. You can interact with Pepper by speaking to it or by tapping the tablet on its chest.
“We’re not replacing people, we’re giving them more time to do what they’re good at,” Seret told deBanked.
Seret said that there are already 15,000 Pepper robots being used in throughout the world, many of them in the hospitality industry. There is a Pepper robot that greets visitors at the Mandarin Hotel in Las Vegas and at least one at the Oakland airport in California. They are helpful to provide any repetitive information and are also used at hospitals.
“Pepper is great for engagement with kids,” Seret said of children at hospitals.
Pablo Sanchez, Head of Retail Banking at HSBC, said that HSBC staff brought Pepper outside on the street yesterday for two minutes and 200 people surrounded the robot. Of the onlookers, one came in to learn more about HSBC’s products and then opened multiple accounts. With foot traffic at the Fifth Avenue flagship branch of 18 million people a year, part of Pepper’s appeal is to draw in potential customers.
“But [Pepper] is not just a gimmick,” Sanchez said.
Right now, Pepper mostly serves the role of a knowledgeable greeter, answering questions like “Where can I deposit a check?” Pepper will tell people where to find the ATM machines. But Sanchez said that down the road Pepper could help people open accounts.
While Pepper is capable of facial recognition and collecting and storing other data, Pepper doesn’t that because of privacy laws that SoftBank Robotics and HSBC must abide by and are very respectful of, said Head of Studio at SoftBank Robotics Omar Abdelwahed. But Abdelwahed said that Pepper would be capable of recognizing a regular hotel guest, knowing that the guest is part of a loyalty program and then upgrading the guest’s room.
A Pepper robot is $25,000 to buy, although SoftBank is mostly using a leasing model where users pay about $16,000 for the robot.
Why KeyBank Acquired Small Business Lending Platform from Bolstr
June 25, 2018KeyBank announced last week the acquisition of a digital lending platform for small businesses created by Bolstr. The lending platform will allow KeyBank to more efficiently serve small businesses for their SBA and traditional lending needs, according to Jamie Warder, Head of KeyBank Business Banking.
“We found Bolstr to have a very flexible capability…and we believe that having the platform will allow us to get to a decision faster,” Warder told deBanked.
Founded in 2010 by Charlie Tribbett and Larry Baker in the Chicago area, Bolstr created a marketplace that connected small business borrowers to institutional and retail accredited investors, or individuals. KeyBank acquired the platform that facilitated this, but not the company. Bolstr no longer operates as it had, but it will continue to work with its current clients, according to Warder.
Warder said that with this acquisition, KeyBank, a regional bank, hopes to attract more small business customers who are looking for speed and ease in obtaining a loan. He thinks that with Bolstr’s platform, KeyBank can be more competitive, although he didn’t say that the bank’s qualifications for obtaining loans would necessarily change.
The Bolstr platform includes features like easy eSignatures, information gathering and digital questionnaires. Already, KeyBank has hundreds of thousands of small business customers, Warder said. The bank, which is headquartered in Cleveland, OH, is more than 100 years old and operates in 15 states.
Tech Changes Lending And Payments The World Over
June 25, 2018On a business trip to China last summer, Matt Burton had plenty of money in his wallet but it was practically useless.
Case in point: He had a lengthy standoff with a Shanghai taxi driver who insisted on a mobile-phone payment. “I spent 20 minutes arguing with the cabbie,” says Burton, one of the founding partners at Orchard Platform, a leading provider of technology and software to the alternative lending industry. “You’d think that — out of all of the professions — a taxi driver would accept cash.”
The New Yorker finally convinced the cab driver to take the payment in renminbi, China’s paper currency. The incident, meanwhile, is illustrative of how deeply and widely mobile payments have penetrated the huge Chinese market. “No one in China carries wallets anymore,” Burton reports. “Everyone pays with their smart-phones. Even the elderly women selling vegetables on the side of the road accept mobile payments,” he adds. “Cash has become a hassle.”
Welcome to China’s financial technology revolution. Almost overnight, China’s population graduated from calculating with the 16th-century abacus to showcasing what is arguably the world’s most sophisticated system of mobile payments. Thanks to financial technology, China is fast becoming a cashless economy. China is just one place outside the U.S. where financial technology is catching on in a big way. As Americans remain, for the most part, wedded to suburban drive-in banks, walk-up automated teller machines, and plastic credit and debit cards, the rest of the world is rapidly embracing digital solutions. And nowhere is that happening more dramatically than in China.
According to the most recent figures released by China’s Internet Network Information Center, the country had 724 million mobile phone users at the end of June 2017. China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology reports, moreover, that consumers paying for everything from food and clothing to utility bills to movie tickets and – you guessed it, cab fare — engaged in 239 billion mobile payment transactions in 2017, a surge of 146 percent over the previous year.
Mobile payments have become a $16 trillion industry in China, the ministry adds, accounting for about half of all such transactions in the world.
And there’s ample room to grow. The World Bank discloses that there are now 772 million Internet users in China, more than double the entire population of the U.S. Yet that leaves 50% of China’s population – mostly in the countryside and rural areas – who are not yet plugged in to the Internet.
Two Chinese mobile-payment platforms dominate the industry. Ant Financial is the 800-pound-gorilla, its Alipay program boasting 520 million global users on its website. It’s an affiliate of publicly traded Alibaba Group Holding, an online merchandiser known as the “Amazon of China” which was founded by entrepreneur Jack Ma, reputedly the richest man in China.
Alipay not only has bragging rights to roughly 60 percent of China’s digital and online payments market but, in 2013, it overtook PayPal as the global leader in third-party payments. With deep roots in e-commerce, Alipay is the go-to payments option for online shoppers, who are steadily migrating from laptops to mobile devices.
WeChat Pay is the upstart in the duopolistic rivalry. Launched in 2013, nearly a decade later than its rival, it’s a unit of conglomerate Tencent Holdings, a social network and messaging platform often compared to Facebook. As WeChat continues to add subscribers, its Tenpay app has been growing accordingly, eroding Alipay’s market share as new users gravitate to the e-payments program. While WeChat records fewer payments than Alipay, Forbes magazine reports that it claims more users.
Whatever WeChat’s virtues, Ant Financial continues to chew up the scenery. It recently topped the charts as the world’s “most innovative” fintech in 2017, as reckoned by a research team formed by accounting giant KPMG and H2 Ventures. China scored a hat trick, moreover, as two additional homegrown fintechs — online property-and-casualty insurer ZhongAn and credit-provider Qudian Inc. — took second and third place, respectively, in KPMG/H2’s rankings. For good measure, China also claimed five of the top ten spots on the “most innovative” list, edging out the U.S., which had four.
Financial analysts recently surveyed by the Financial Times reckon Ant Financial’s market valuation at $150 billion, catapulting the company into the rarified status of not just a “unicorn,” but a “super-unicorn.” (Named after the rarely seen mythical one-horned horse, “unicorns” are start-ups valued at $1 billion). So robust is Ant Financial’s market valuation that the global investment community is salivating over its impending initial public offering.
(Ant’s progenitor, Alibaba, holds bragging rights as the largest IPO ever, according to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. It raised $21.8 billion in 2014; its NYSE-listed stock was trading at $194.36 in mid-May, essentially in the same league as Apple and Facebook, trading at $188.80 and 187.08, respectively, on Nasdaq.)
“Four of the largest fintech unicorns in the world are coming out of Asia,” notes Dorel Blitz, the Tel Aviv-based head of fintech at KPMG. “The companies are getting bigger and stronger,” he adds, “and you’re beginning to see more direct investment in public fintech companies as well.”
Adds Orchard’s Burton: “I think it shows you how massive the opportunities are outside the U.S.”
Ant Financial and WeChat are also serving as a world-class demonstration project on how fintechs can turn a tidy profit while opening up financial services to large populations who lack access to basic financial services, thereby providing entry to the middle class. The two platforms have provided “financial inclusion for tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions of people” who previously were on the periphery of the banking and financial system, says Kai Schmitz, a fintech lender at International Finance Corporation that lends to private businesses in the developing world.
Once people are making electronic payments on their mobile devices, Schmitz notes, it creates a “pathway” to a whole panoply of financial services, including personal and business loans, savings, insurance, and investments.
“You can create a user profile so that a large part of the population that could not be reached (by traditional financial institutions) are now making payments and can be followed on the data track,” he says.
The World Bank reports that two billion adults and 200 million businesses in the developing world are currently unable to access even basic financial services. Through IFC, the World Bank has invested $370 million in fintech companies operating throughout Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Latin America. The fintechs, an IFC communications manager told deBanked, offer “a range of products and services — from e-wallets, virtual banks, lending, and online payments to retail payment points and exchanges.” IFC, she adds, also invests in fintech funds.
Anju Patwardhan is the U.S.-based managing director at CreditEase Fintech Investment Fund, a $1 billion Chinese venture capital firm that invests in fintechs delivering financial services to “unbanked” and “underbanked” populations. “They are living in Africa, Bangladesh, China and elsewhere on less than two dollars a day and have no access to financial services,” she says.
“But there are also a very large number of people who may be technically included in the financial system but still don’t have access to a full range of financial services at reasonable prices,” she adds. “If someone is borrowing from a moneylender or pawnbroker, it doesn’t count (as financial inclusion). In that case, the number of people is very much more than two billion.”
Once phone towers are built and a payments infrastructure is in place, fintechs promising more sophisticated financial services can operate similarly to the settlers who followed pioneers in the U.S.’s westward expansion. That’s been the story in Kenya and other African countries where M-Pesa (“pesa” is Swahili for money) and other mobile-phone payments systems set up shop a decade ago.
Branch International, based in San Francisco but doing business exclusively in emerging and frontier markets for only three years, is one of the settlers. It boasts that it now has the “No. 1 finance app in Africa.” In March, Branch raised $70 million in a second-stage round of debt and equity financing from a group of venture capitalists led by Trinity Partners that included Patwardhan’s CreditEase and the IFC. Patwardhan will serve as an advisor to Branch’s board.
Branch’s principal business is making loans and micro-loans ranging from as little as $2 to $1,000 in Nigeria, Kenya, and Tanzania. Despite its name, Branch touts itself as a “branchless bank”, all of the credit transactions taking place on mobile devices, says Matt Flannery, Branch’s chief executive and founder. Its average loan amount is $25.
Many of Branch’s customers are individuals and businesses who often had trouble obtaining credit from established financial institutions or were ineligible for loans. But, according to Branch’s website, it’s possible for a prospective borrower to obtain a loan in just a matter of minutes. “Branch eliminates the challenges of getting a loan by using the data on your phone to create a credit score,” the website says. Branch promises privacy, fees that are “fair and transparent,” and terms that “allow for easy repayment” with no “late fees or rollover fees”. “As you pay back on time,” the website also says, “our fees decrease, and you unlock larger loans with more flexible terms.”
The platform, CEO Flannery says, has lent out $100 million dollars to roughly that same number of people. “The formal financial system in African countries is generally composed of old-fashioned banks that are risk-averse and fairly slow to make lending decisions,” he says. “People really appreciate us,” Flannery adds. “I’d say we’re like Uber and they’re the horse-and-buggy.”
The company is growing by 20 percent month-over-month and expects to disburse more than $250 million in 2018. Asked to describe Branch’s typical borrower, Flannery says: “We have some rural users (of Branch’s finance app). But in general we’re serving the commercial middle-class — shopkeepers and entrepreneurs – in urban capitals.” Want to know precisely who Branch’s customers are? “Just go to downtown Lagos (the capital of Nigeria and the largest city on the African continent) and you’ll see all different kinds of businesses and single-owner merchants on street corners,” Flannery says.
Jeff Stewart, the founder and chairman of Lenddo (which recently merged with competitor EFL) asserts that his firm’s machine learning technology and risk modeling techniques, which are being deployed in emerging countries from Costa Rica to The Philippines, have the capacity to assess the “creditworthiness of everyone on the planet.” In the absence of credit history in much of the developing world, he explains, this can done by constructing a risk profile combining both “psychometrics” and a “digital footprint.”
Psychometrics is a behavioral assessment tool based on a prospective borrower’s “Big Five” personality traits: openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism (OCEAN for short). “What we’ve been able to show,” Stewart asserts, “is that certain personality types have a positive and negative correlation with repayment. It’s not 100 percent accurate. But you can predict the statistical recovery ratio on repayment. You can say that, for a person with a high score, something like 88 out of 1,000 people (with his or her profile) would not repay.”
The digital footprint, which is the second “critical component,” Stewart says, analyzes a prospective borrower’s reliability by reconnoitering their smartphone usage. “We’ll look at everything on your phone,” he says, “How you use the phone. Whom you interact with. When you use your phone. There are thousands of features that generate a digital footprint. Everything from meeting someone at a sports bar to the apps on your phone to things like e-mailed receipts that show your financial activity.”
Such methods help build credit for those lacking credit history while rehabilitating those whose credit history is blemished. And all that’s needed is a smartphone. “We’ve turned the smartphone into a credit bureau,” Stewart says.
The acquisition of smartphones is taking place at a blistering pace, Stewart notes, now that cell phone costs are “at the bottom of the cost pyramid” in many countries. For example, a “low-end Android” now fetches as little as $25 in Africa. “One credible study I’ve seen shows that every 10% percent rise in access to smartphones translates into a 1/2 percent rise in a country’s gross domestic product,” Stewart says.
While the private sector is driving the trend to financial inclusion in China and Africa, India’s government-driven model “is setting a new global standard in using financial technologies to support financial inclusion,” declares Patwardhan of CreditEase, who also lectures at Stanford. “The country has become a giant testing ground for financial inclusion and innovation,” she argues in a recent academic paper, “and may become a role model for other emerging economies.”
India’s state-run effort includes a $1.3 billion digital identity program known as Aadhaar. Under Aadhaar (which means “foundation”), the state issues residents a 12-digit identity number that’s based on their biometric data –such as fingerprints and iris scans — and personal information. The ID number covers more than 1.19 billion residents. In just the first two years after Aadhaar’s 2009 debut, Patwardhan says, more than 250 million Indians were able to open bank accounts.
Jo Ann Barefoot, chief executive at Barefoot Innovation Group in Washington, D.C. and a senior fellow emerita at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, agrees. She notes that Aadhaar opened up access to both fintech services and bank accounts to women who were long treated as second-class citizens by the social and economic system. “India’s digital ID program means that wives and daughters have identity now,” she says.
“In the past,” she adds, “only (male) heads of households would have family identity documents and a government card — which would be the equivalent of having a Social Security number in the U.S. But the wife wouldn’t have her own card. So this is a massive door-opener to fintech growth. And it’s also opening up (all areas of) finance to millions and millions of people.”
India’s “digitalization” program, moreover, has entailed development of a national payments network called “unified payments interface,” or UPI. The combination of UPI and Aadhaar as well as other digital initiatives have resulted in “a surge of online lending platforms,” says Patwardhan, citing Capital Float, NeoGrowth, Faircent, LendingKart, Quiklo, IndiaLends, CreditExchange, and Onemi.
The homegrown fintechs, however, will be up against tremendous external pressure as India, with 1.3 billion people and poised to overtake China in population growth, is generating enormous interest from global fintechs. Among outside platforms piling into the country are China’s Ant Financial and WeChat. The former took a $1 billion stake in Paytm, an Indian mobile payments and e-commerce company. Similarly, competitor WeChat’s parent, Tencent, has invested in Hike, a mobile wallet valued at $1.4 billion last June, according to CNBC, exciting investor interest as a unicorn.
U.S. companies are getting into the act too. Google launched digital payments app Tez last September, which “is taking advantage of India’s infrastructure and has already gotten 30 million downloads,” Patwardhan says. In February, Facebook rolled out a peer-to-peer payments feature on WhatsApp. Even Branch’s Flannery has announced that his “branchless bank” plans to earmark part of its $70 million war chest to offer $2-to-$1000 loans on the subcontinent.
Having banned high-denomination paper bills as a way to rein in corruption and aiming at a cashless economy, India has been innovating in ways that “have gone the Chinese one better,” marvels Patwardhan. “Their payment systems going through the UPI network are interoperable,” she notes, for example. “You don’t have to be on the same app or with the same bank. India is now on the cutting edge.”
New Law Benefits Small Banks
May 24, 2018President Trump signed into law today the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act, which pares down Dodd-Frank regulations for thousands of small and medium-sized American banks. Dodd-Frank refers to the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, which instated laws to regulate the risky behaviors of banks that led to the 2008-2010 financial crisis.
Among the changes this new law makes to Dodd-Frank is reducing the number of banks that are subject to strong government oversight because they are considered “systemically important.” Banks with assets of $50 billion or more had been considered “systemically important.” As of today, only banks with assets of $250 billion or more will get that moniker and be subject to the strictest government regulations.
In addition to this, small banks – generally with assets of $10 billion or less – will now be much freer to originate residential mortgages. And they will have to comply with fewer regulations in general.
“There are simplifications in [this law] that change the capital costs for smaller banks,” said Dodd-Frank expert and Senior Counsel at Morrison & Foerster, Oliver Ireland. “By lowering the cost structure of the bank, you may facilitate lending at either lower rates, or more lending.”
Ireland said that there is no way to quantify this, but acknowledged that small banks will be in a stronger position with this new law in place. As for the effect of the new law on alternative lenders, Ireland didn’t predict anything at all dramatic.
Still, he said, “There are a number of provisions in here that make the cost of being a small bank somewhat less. That may put them in a better position to compete with non-bank lenders.”
SmartBiz Adds Seacoast Bank as a Partner
May 9, 2018SmartBiz announced yesterday that it has added Seacoast Bank as one of its partner banks, bringing the total number of its bank partners to eight. Seacoast Bank is one of Florida’s largest regional banks with approximately $5.8 billion in assets and $4.6 billion in deposits as of December 31, 2017.
“I think they’ve got a real innovation mindset as a way to deliver on customer needs,” SmartBiz CEO Evan Singer said of Seacoast.
Singer told deBanked that SmartBiz seeks to partner with banks that embrace technology and like working with fintech companies, which is why he said Seacoast is so appealing.
“We are very focused on meeting small business needs from a capital perspective,” Singer said, “[which means saying] yes to the amount that I need in a way that I can repay it at the lowest rate I can get, [and] in a fast and easy way. If a bank has a similar philosophy on meeting customer needs, putting customers first and wanting to embrace technology…then it could be a good fit.”
SmartBiz is an online marketplace for SBA loans that helps small businesses apply for loans and helps banks underwrite them. The company makes money by licensing software to both parties to ultimately connect the right small business with the most appropriate bank, given the customer’s needs and the bank’s credit parameters.
Seacoast Bank has offices in cities throughout Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, Boca Raton, West Palm Beach and Orlando.
“We see SmartBiz Loans and its unique technology platform as a great fit and the means to supply more qualified small business owners with the capital infusion they need to grow,” said Julie Kleffel, executive vice president and community banking executive at Seacoast Bank.
In February, SmartBiz announced that it had surpassed JP Morgan as the number one facilitator of SBA 7(a) loans under $350,000 for the calendar year 2017. When asked if SmartBiz is on par to maintain its record for 2018, Singer said that he thinks so, but would have to check the data. He said SmartBiz is growing and is currently looking to hire.
Founded in 2009, SmartBiz employs a little over 100 people. The company is headquartered in San Francisco and has an office in Austin. The employee ratio between San Francisco and Austin is roughly 80 and 20 percent, respectively.
Fed Study Debunks “Lax Screening” Hypothesis Of Fintech Lenders
February 23, 2018The New York Federal Reserve published the results of their study on the role of technology in mortgage lending. And they bear good news for fintech, that technological innovation has improved the efficiency of financial intermediation.
Fintech lenders, it turns out, are faster, experience lower default rates, and are more responsive to changes in demand. Faster processing times did not translate into issuing riskier loans, the report concludes.
Fintech lenders were defined as lenders that offer an application process that can be completed entirely online.
The Fed researchers also found little evidence that fintech lenders disproportionately target marginal borrowers with low access to finance. On the Contrary, the data actually shows that fintech borrowing is actually higher among those both older and more educated.
“We find that default rates on fintech mortgages are about 25% lower than those for traditional lenders, even when controlling for detailed loan characteristics,” the report says. “There is no significant difference in interest rates. These results speak against a lax screening hypothesis, and instead indicate that fintech lending technologies may help attract and screen for less risky borrowers.”
The two largest fintech mortgage originators in 2016 were Quicken Loans and loanDepot.