Loans

LendingPoint: CAN Capital’s Close Neighbor in Kennesaw

August 14, 2017
Article by:

This story appeared in deBanked’s Jul/Aug 2017 magazine issue. To receive copies in print, SUBSCRIBE FREE

Kennesaw, GA City HallLendingPoint, a consumer lender staffed largely by former CAN Capital employees, may have something to teach the alternative small-business finance industry about creditworthiness. Three-year-old LendingPoint claims to go beyond FICO scores to bring each applicant’s sense of fiscal responsibility into sharper focus.

But first, let’s examine the CAN Capital connection. Four or five members of LendingPoint’s top management team came to the company after lengthy tenures at CAN Capital, a LendingPoint official says. That includes Tom Burnside, LendingPoint’s CEO and founder, and Franck Fatras, the company’s president and chief operating officer. Both worked 13 years for CAN Capital, with Burnside leaving as chief operating officer and Fatras departing as chief technology officer, according to biographies posted online.

All told, about 30 of LendingPoint’s 100 or so employees – a total that includes outsourced positions – formerly labored at CAN Capital, according to Fatras. Many put in considerable time at CAN Capital, holding jobs there in management, corporate governance, legal affairs, risk, sales, operations, IT, marketing, analytics, design, customer service, partner success and success delivery, online reports say.

Geography no doubt encourages CAN Capital employees to consider LendingPoint when it’s time to move on to another job. Both companies maintain headquarters in office parks in the Atlanta suburb of Kennesaw. In fact, the two companies operate half a mile apart, both of them just off of Cobb Place Boulevard Northwest, according to Google Maps and Directions.

The way Fatras tells it, LendingPoint hasn’t raided CAN Capital’s workforce. “We post the job, and they end up responding,” he says. “When they’re known quantities and people we have a lot of respect for, we just end up making it work.”

Moreover, LendingPoint’s connections with other companies don’t begin or end with CAN Capital. Some of the people in top management met when they worked at First Data Corp. and Western Union, Fatras recalls. Juan E. Tavares, co-founder and chief strategy officer, and Victor J. Pacheco, chief product officer, came from those relationships, he says.

Regardless of where they became acquainted, Lendingpoint’s leadership team has come together to form a direct balance-sheet consumer lender specializing in what they call a “near prime” clientele. The company defines the phrase “near prime” to include personal-loan applicants with FICO scores from 600 to 700, Fatras says, adding that the segment’s not sub-prime and not prime. The company has even trademarked “NEARPRIME” as a single word in capital letters, and it appears that way on the company website. It regards those consumers as “deserving yet underserved,” Fatras notes.

To qualify those applicants for credit, LendingPoint considers “behavior,” such as work history, education, and timeliness with paying rent, utility bills and cell phone bills, Fatras says. “A lot of what we do is identify patterns,” he says. “It’s all about asking the right questions.” The process requires tapping into multiple sources to collect the data, he observes.

welcome to kennesawIn a blog published online soon after LendingPoint was launched, executives Burnside and Tavares claim that most credit models search for ways to say no to applicants, while their company uses big data to find ways of saying yes. LendingPoint algorithms predict risk with great precision, they say.

In a newspaper opinion piece that ran about the same time, Burnside and Tavares maintain that their model examines cycles in an applicant’s life to pinpoint upward and downward trends. A consumer on the way up deserves a loan, according to the theory.

The company’s willingness to study information that resides outside credit scores did not originate with the CAN Capital connection, Fatras says. “The model is unique and the data structure we are using is unique,” he says. “It’s all about understanding the credit story of the person.”

Latin American lending practices had some influence on LendingPoint, Burnside and Tavares write in one of their editorial pieces. Lenders there review factors other than credit scores because the scores aren’t readily available in some countries, they write.

To analyze that type of non-FICO information, LendingPoint has developed its own internal scoring model and then automated the process, spending a lot of time to develop the technology, Fatras continues. Once again, asking the right questions determines the meaning that the company can extract from the data, he emphasizes. Otherwise, the information’s just not that beneficial, he says.

When consumers come to the LendingPoint website and answer five or six questions, they can receive a firm offer of credit in an average of seven seconds and sometimes as quickly as four seconds, Fatras maintains. The offers are contingent upon the company underwriting department’s validation of income and other figures, ne notes, adding that “we’re pretty happy with the infrastructure we’ve built.”

LendingPoint collects on the loans with automatic payments from customers’ savings or checking accounts twice a month, according to the company website. Deducting the payments twice a month helps customers with budgeting, the site says. Consumers can borrow up to $20,000 and pay it back in 24 to 48 months.

The system was devised by top management with combined experience of more than a century in credit and risk, Fatras says. When those executives with so much commercial lending experience gather around the conference table to talk about the business, the possibility of lending to small businesses occasionally comes up in the conversation.

But Fatras doubts the company will make that move to the commercial side anytime soon because companies in the alternative small-business finance industry are competing for 5 million to 6 million potential customers while the country has 50 million near-prime consumers. “The space is so big where we are,” he says. “The demand could be over a billion dollars a month. We have a lot of room in front of us for growth.”

With that seemingly infinite market, LendingPoint has been growing at a healthy pace, Fatras says. The company, which was self-funded for the first year, made its initial loan in January 2015. In 2016, it did $150 million in business, he notes. By the middle of this year, the company had made a total of $250 million in loans to 25,000 consumers, he says.

It’s a business model that members of the alternative small-business finance community might do well to emulate, Fatras suggests. “There could be a lot of cross-pollination,” between consumer and commercial loans when it comes to going beyond FICO, he says.


LendingPoint executives that were formerly at CAN Capital

Tom Burnside, CEO
formerly a COO and president at CAN

Franck Fatras, President and COO
formerly a CTO at CAN

Mark Lorimer, Chief Marketing Officer
formerly a CMO at CAN

Dave Switzer, Chief Analytics Officer
formerly a VP at CAN

Joe Valeo, EVP of Strategic Development
formerly an EVP at CAN

SmartBiz Loans Expands Its Footprint With a NorCal Bank

April 25, 2017
Article by:

Technology-based lending platform SmartBiz Loans, which is dedicated to facilitating SBA loans, has expanded its bank roster. SmartBiz announced today a new partnership with Sacramento-based Five Star Bank, bringing the tally of the number of banks on the startup’s platform to five and thrusting marketplace lending into the spotlight once again.

Five Star already delivers SBA loans to customers but through the SmartBiz platform will slash both the time and costs in the underwriting process while reaching new small business customers in the process.

Evan Singer, CEO of SmartBiz Loans, told deBanked that the mindset of the executive team at the Silicon Valley startup has always been to bring banks back into the fold and to incentivize them to fill a void in the market left by the financial crisis by originating smaller loans, in particular SBA loans.

“What we’ve seen in the market is that good businesses cannot get access to low-priced capital if they want to borrow $250,000. So sure, if they want to borrow $5 million they can get access. That’s why we came up with the idea to bring the banks back through fintech,” he said.

Five Star Bank, a privately held bank with $850 million in total assets, is pleased to be among those ranks. James Beckwith, president and CEO of Five Star Bank, was introduced to the SmartBiz technology about a year ago after which time the bank execs began the due diligence process.

“I was intrigued,” Beckwith told deBanked. “We felt the need to somehow play in the space. But we also knew it wasn’t practical for us to develop our own platform. So this was really right in our sweet spot of how we like to partner with people.”

As a result of the partnership Five Star Bank, which makes loans from its own balance sheet, is reaching small business clients the bank did not have access to before.

“Our market presence didn’t allow us to touch a lot of these businesses before, whether from Los Angeles, or Arizona, or San Jose. It’s really people we were unable to touch now being touched through the SmartBiz partnership,” said Beckwith, adding that the small businesses span industry verticals.

“At this point we’re looking at deals in the Western United States and we hope to expand that. The small businesses are really all types – construction companies, PR firms, consulting firms, — there’s no concentration in terms of industry type,” he noted.

The bank’s target customer is seeking a loan for $350,000 or less and the average loan size is $250,000 to $270,000. Terms of an SBA loan on this platform are comprised of a rate of Prime plus 2.75 over a 10-year period.

“The term is much longer and the rate is much lower than traditional loans. Small businesses can save thousands of dollars per month by getting an SBA loan through the SmartBiz and Five Star partnership,” said Singer. In fact, Five Star bank spends about one-tenth of the time on a file or customer originating from SmartBiz than it would on a customer coming from the traditional retail side of their business.

Industry Shakeout

Much of the fallout in the marketplace lending market segment has been tied to the stigma of subprime lending. Beckwith is quick to point out, however, that the underwriting standards for the loans on this platform, which are agreed upon by both Five Star and SmartBiz, are high.

“If you look at some of the average FICO scores we are doing, they are actually good deals. They’re SBA, they’re not subprime deals. I would not characterize them as subprime deals at all,” Beckwith said.

Meanwhile the marketplace lending segment has undoubtedly become more crowded in recent years, attracting the likes of lenders and non-lenders alike, evidenced by the participation of Amazon and Square Capital in this space, for instance.

According to Singer some industry shakeout can be expected in the near term. He expects over the next couple of years that those marketplace lenders and other alternative lenders unable to meet customer demands will either experience a wave of consolidation or they simply won’t be around any longer.

“We are already starting to see a number of our loan proceeds being used to refinance expensive shorter-term debt where they save thousands per month. Businesses are getting smarter with available options and folks that are able to best meet and deliver with small businesses on their minds first are going to come out on top,” said Singer.

SBA 7(a) Cap

As a technology platform dedicated to SBA loans, the issue of the program’s annual allotted cap is something that gets revisited on an ongoing basis. Nonetheless even when the SBA program has come close to suspension, Congress has stepped in to keep it afloat.
“The great thing about SBA is that it has support from both sides of the aisle in D.C. We’ll see what happens this year,” said Singer.

James agrees. “Every year that this becomes an issue the cap has been increased. I feel comfortable that what has happened in the past will happen again in the future because these programs are very viable. The small business space has very strong economic development activity.”

If they’re right this bodes well not only for the Smart Biz and Five Star partnership but also the new banks that the tech-based lender has in its pipeline.

“We are adding banks into the marketplace. And we’re selective about who we add,” Singer said.

Blazing Trails in Unexplored Financial Markets

April 4, 2017
Article by:

fintechOnce upon a time people with health insurance who were treated for medical emergencies, illnesses or chronic health conditions –an illness or accident requiring hospitalization, an appendectomy, or a hip replacement, say – could rest easy. Insurance underwriters like United Health, Wellpoint or Humana would surely handle most, if not all, of a patient’s medical expenses.

Today? Not so much. As healthcare becomes ever more pricey, employers are increasingly offering health insurance plans that are less generous and require consumers to pay higher deductibles. Individuals as well are finding that the same goes for them: The only way to afford health insurance is to purchase a plan with a high deductible.

“We’re at a tipping point where the cost of healthcare is outpacing GDP,” says Adam Tibbs, chief executive and co-founder of Parasail Health, a start-up alternative lender in the San Francisco Bay area. “As a result,” he adds, “the only way health insurance can work is either to raise (the cost of) premiums or opt for higher deductibles.”

Statistics confirm Tibbs’s assertion. As of last autumn, according to a September, 2016, survey by Kaiser Family Foundation, the average deductible for workers’ health insurance policies jumped to $1,478, up by more than 12% from $1,318 in 2015. The survey found, moreover, that – for the first time — slightly more than half of all covered workers have deductibles of at least $1,000. At smaller companies, the average deductible is now more than $2,000.

Parasail, a Sausalito-based alternative lender which opened its doors last September, is angling to fill that void. Funded with seed capital raised from four venture capital firms — Healthy Ventures, Montage Ventures, Peter Thiel, and Tiller Partners, reports online data-publisher Crunchbase – Parasail acts as a go-between, connecting the medical practitioners to third-party lenders.

In partnering with doctors, hospitals, and medical clinics, Parasail employs a business model that resembles an auto dealership. After the customers picks out a four-door sedan or a sport utility vehicle, he or she drives it home thanks to a five-year, monthly-payment plan from, say, Capital One.

Similarly, after agreeing to a costly medical procedure, the patient can strike an arrangement with a medical provider’s billing department for on-the-spot financing. Once the deductible is covered, the patient is cleared to glide into the operating room.

Despite being open for less than a year, Tibbs says, Parasail has enlisted as partners some 2,500 medical practitioners with unpaid patient debt of roughly $4 billion. The typical loan averages $6,000. “Our goal,” remarks Parasails marketing vice-president, Dave Matli, “is to create a normal retail experience” so that financing medical debts is as seamless as swiping a credit card.

Meanwhile, industry experts say that Parasail represents a new breed in the financial technology sector. As online alternative lending and the broader fintech industry grow more established, institutional investors and financiers are increasingly wagering bets on companies that promise more than disruptive technologies or cheaper loans.

Increasingly, they are hunting for companies like Parasail that are introducing new products or blazing trails in unexplored markets. “The area that I find most interesting,” says Phin Upham, a venture capitalist and board member at Parasail, is investing in companies that “are developing products that didn’t exist before, serving people who haven’t been served, and playing a unique role incentivizing long-term behaviors.” (Upham, who is a principal at Peter Thiel’s VC firm, emphasizes that he is speaking only for himself.)

Pulse of FintechParasail’s fundraising and launch has taken place against a dramatic drop in both global and U.S. fintech financing, according to KPMG’s annual report on the industry, “The Pulse of Fintech.” The accounting firm reports that total funding for fintech companies and deal activity plummeted by more than 50% in the U.S. in 2016 to $12.8 billion from $27 billion the prior year. KPMG attributed much of the drop to “political and regulatory uncertainty, a decline in megadeals, and investor caution.”

The year “2016 brought reality back to the market” after the banner, record-shattering year of 2015, the report noted.

Venture capital financing in the U.S., however, did not slip as dramatically as overall funding, sliding some 30% to $4.6 billion from $6 billion in 2015. (Almost overlooked in the report was that corporate investment capital was “the most active in the past seven years,” KPMG’s report notes, representing 18 percent of venture fintech financing.)

Steve Krawciw, a New York-based fintech startup executive asserts that “the business has matured and, yes, there have been defaults, but the business model for fintech has stabilized.” The author of “Real-Time Risk: What Investors Should Know About FinTech, High-Frequency Trading, and Flash Crashes,” Krawciw expects more funding to stream into the industry as new players such as banks, insurance companies, hedge funds and private equity get involved. They’ll “go in a number of different directions,” he reckons, “especially direct lending by hedge funds and private equity firms.”

No figures have yet been released by KPMG for the first quarter of 2017, just ended in March, but fintech industry participants are mightily impressed at news of the $500 million financing for Social Finance Inc. (SoFi). Best known for its refinancing of student loans, the San Francisco firm reported on February 24 that it raised a half-billion dollars in a financing round led by private equity firm Silver Lake Partners. Other investors include SoftBank Group and GPI Capital, bringing SoFi’s total investment to $1.9 billion, the company said in a press release.

SoFiSoFi, which plans to use the funds to expand online lending into international markets and devise new financial products, is ambitiously transforming itself into an online financial emporium. Along with a suite of online wares that mimic traditional banking and financial products – savings accounts, life insurance policies and mutual funds – SoFi has also invented new online offerings.

For example, SoFi formed a partnership with secondary mortgage lender Fannie Mae and, together, the companies are enabling borrowers to refinance both mortgage and student debt. The SoFi financing, says Krawciw, “is not a seminal deal, it’s a sign of what’s coming.”

SoFi may also be providing a road map for fintech companies like Parasail. After building a customer base with health-care loans at 5.88% annual percent rate — compared with credit cards charging interest rates about four times as much – Parasail could be poised to sell additional products to its built-in audience.

Just as SoFi got big on refinancing student loans, Parasail could use healthcare lending as a springboard for future financial endeavors. Its revenues have been growing by 50% month-over-month.

By the first quarter of next year, Tibbs says, the firm will be breaking even.” And at that point, he adds, it expects to roll out a menu of new products too.

For Marketplace Lending Securitizations, A Bumpy Road But Strong Investor Sentiment

April 3, 2017
Article by:

A new report by published by PeerIQ contains 10 recent examples of trigger breaches in marketplace lending ABS transactions.

“Since the inception of MPL ABS market, we have observed 10% of deals breaching triggers historically,” the report says. It goes on to say that these events are typically manifestations of “unexpected credit performance, poor credit modeling, or unguarded structuring practice.”

Marketplace Lending Asset Backed Securities

“If an early amortization trigger is violated, excess spreads are diverted from equity investors to senior noteholders with the goal of de-risking the senior noteholders as quickly as possible.”

CAN Capital is the lone small business lender on the above list and we reported on their trigger breach back in December. Little public information has come out about the company since they stopped lending late last year.

PeerIQ tracker Q1 2017The most recent trigger breach on the list was SoFi, a company known for courting super prime borrowers.

“Trigger breaching events do not necessarily imply credit deterioration of the collateral pool,” the PeerIQ report states. In another section of the report that addresses increased losses for non-bank lenders, it says that two of the three primary drivers of that are borrowers stacking loans and lenders shifting to riskier borrowers.

Nonetheless, Q1 was a record quarter for marketplace lending securitizations with seven deals priced for $3 billion. That’s a 100% increase over Q12016. “The industry continues to experience strong investor sentiment as evidenced by growing deal size and improved deal execution,” they say.

“We expect higher volatility from rising rates, regulatory uncertainty, and an exit from a period of unusually benign credit conditions. Platforms that can sustain low-cost stable capital access, build investor confidence via 3rd party tools, and embrace strong risk management frameworks will grow and acquire market share.”

In This Online Lender’s Earnings Report, Profits, MCAs and Term Loans

March 22, 2017
Article by:

Enova (NYSE:ENVA) shows that an online lending business can be profitable

Limited details were offered when Enova, a publicly traded company, acquired The Business Backer (TBB) in June 2015. For one, the Cincinnati Business Courier had the exclusive, which one might not describe as the typical go-to source for online finance news. But TBB was not typical. Based in Blue Ash, Ohio as opposed to New York City or San Francisco, the company had originally focused on offering merchant cash advances before eventually expanding their suite of solutions to include other products.

According to Enova’s earnings report, TBB had been purchased for $26.4 million with an estimated contingent $5.7 million of that being based on future earn-out opportunities. There was a caveat though. If future operating results exceeded expectations, that contingent amount could increase over time, but not beyond where the total consideration paid for the company exceeded $71 million. As of 2016’s year-end, that contingent amount had increased by $3.3 million.

Enova’s report makes several mentions of their merchant cash advance business or as they call them, receivable purchase agreements (RPAs). For the most part, they obscure the financial metrics of this aspect by lumping it in with installment loans. These installment loans are described as “multi-payment unsecured consumer installment loan products in 17 states in the United States and in the United Kingdom and Brazil” with repayment periods of two to sixty months, so yeah, they’re pretty different.

Their RPA customers, however, “average approximately $1.5 million in annual sales and 10 years of operating history while those who obtain an open line of credit account average approximately $450 thousand in annual sales and 7 years of operating history,” the report says. These lines of credit are primarily offered through a business lending subsidiary called Headway Capital.

While companies like Lending Club and OnDeck grab all the headlines, Enova describes itself as a “leading technology and analytics company focused on providing online financial services.” And in 2016, they extended nearly $2.1 billion in credit to borrowers and had a net income of $34.6 million.

On the company’s Q4 earnings call in February, Company CEO David Fisher said, “There currently seems to be a bit of a shakeout occurring in the non-bank small business lending and financing industry. A number of our competitors have either ceased funding or completely shut down over the past several months. From the intelligence we were able to gather, this is largely due to credit issues and their portfolios. As we mentioned last quarter, we have taken a more methodical approach than some to growth for our small business products. And we’re now seeing the benefits of that approach. Recent advantages of our small business book are performing well and the unit economics continue to improve especially as acquisition costs have dropped following the shakeout I just mentioned.”

Enova’s small business financing portfolio only constituted 12% of their loan portfolio at the end of last year. And at $13.70 a share, the company’s current market cap is larger than OnDeck’s.

SoFi Plays It Safe With Super Bowl Ad – And Kind of Wants to Be Your Bank

February 6, 2017
Article by:

“Here’s to conquering more together in 2017,” SoFi’s Super Bowl ad asserts. The company wants to help you own a home, start a family and see the world. They essentially want to be your bank for life, and now that their acquisition of Zenbanx allows them to offer checking accounts, they pretty much can be. It was no surprise then that their infamous tagline “Don’t Bank” was nowhere to be found in their Super Bowl ad. Watch below:

The ad they ran last year received criticism for labeling people as either great or not great. Maybe it wasn’t the best approach, but it was a very SoFi thing to do at the time.

This year, the only thing missing from their feel-good we-want-to-be-with-you-through-all-your-life-milestones ad is a voice coming on at the end to say “There are some things money can’t buy, for everything else, there’s MasterCard.”

Perhaps SoFi will consider changing their slogan from Don’t Bank to Bank With Us. It’s only a matter of time.

Google Banned Five Million Payday Loan Ads Last Year

February 3, 2017
Article by:

loansAfter Google suspiciously decided to permanently ban payday lending ads from their search results last year, they had to disable more than 5 million payday loan ads, Google’s Sean Spencer wrote in a blog post. They also “took action on 8,000 sites promoting payday loans,” he said.

For years, Google had no problem with payday lending or the advertising revenue it generated for them. In fact, in November 2013, an affiliate company, Google Ventures, even invested in a payday lending company named LendUp. But the harmony was short-lived. Eventually, Google’s search team would ban LendUp and every other payday lender from running ads on their platform after what appears to be government pressure.

  • In May 2016, Google announced they would be banning payday loan ads.
  • In July, that ban started to go into effect.
  • In September, the CFPB announced it had taken action against LendUp, citing deceptive practices and internet ad campaigns that violated federal laws.
  • Google now reports having banned more than 5 million payday loan ads from that time. Other categories were worse, however. Google also had to ban 17 million ads that promoted illegal gambling and 68 million that offered bad healthcare products such as illegal pharmaceuticals.

    Some ads still sneak through or try to sneak through. “Bad actors know that ads for certain products—like weight-loss supplements or payday loans—aren’t allowed by Google’s policies, so they try to trick our systems into letting them through,” Google’s Spencer wrote. “Last year, we took down almost 7 million bad ads for intentionally attempting to trick our detection systems.”

    LendUp, the company Google Ventures invested in, is still in business.

Meet the Online Lender That’s Made $100 Billion in Loans

January 31, 2017
Article by:

Here’s a milestone for you, loanDepot has funded more than $100 billion in loans since they were founded in 2010. Mortgage loans may have enabled them to hit such a higher number in a short amount of time, but they also have a robust personal loan business. The two have more in common than you might think.

One trend that loanDepot CEO Anthony Hsieh shared when he spoke at the Marketplace Lending & Investing Conference back in September, is that since the Great Recession, borrowers that would have traditionally sought a home equity line, have instead been applying for personal loans. They know this because the credit and financial profiles between their home loan borrowers and personal loan borrowers is virtually identical, Hsieh said.

loanDepot celebrated making $100 billion in loans by publishing this video. Have a look: