Loans
Skintech? Fintech Lenders in China Accept Nude Photos As Collateral
June 14, 2016
Some online lenders in China are taking an invasive application process to a whole new level, according to People’s Daily, a Chinese state-owned newspaper. To increase the likelihood of repayment, applicants may be required to upload a nude photo of themselves while holding an ID card, along with contact information for their friends and family members. And if they don’t pay, they’ll threaten to distribute it to all of them accordingly.
People’s Daily wrote that the borrowers tend to be educated university students and they are willing participants to these harsh terms if it means they can get the loan they seek. After all, they actually have to take the photos and upload them to the lender in the first place. Insiders reportedly said that naked IOUs have been a practice for a long time.
A reporter for Sixth Tone, a hip media company overseen by the Chinese government, was able to find a student lender online during their journalistic investigation that indeed requested a nude photo and family contact information. The ability to actually repay the loan was not assessed by the lender.
Fu Jian, a lawyer at Yulong Law Firm based in Zhengzhou that was interviewed by Sixth Tone said that the use of a naked photo as collateral is not forbidden by law, even if it does raise ethical questions. Were the photo to be leaked, only then would the law have been broken. “The online lending industry is like a food chain with some huge financial groups on the top, followed by the platforms, then the middlemen,” Fu said to Sixth Tone. “Students, sadly, are just the prey.”
The highly predatory practice is obviously carried out by unscrupulous players and is not representative of the fintech industry in China.
Midland Funding Gets Mentioned in John Oliver’s HBO Show
June 6, 2016The infamous Midland Funding you might know from the Madden v Midland case, was mentioned on John Oliver’s Last Week Tonight and not in the best context. Midland is a subsidiary of Encore Capital Group, the largest publicly traded debt buyer in the United States and the episode was about the not-always-peachy world of debt buying and debt collection.
Oliver referenced Midland just to provide background on an industry as a whole, not to imply that they were involved in anything negative.
More background was added by Jake Halpern, the author of Bad Paper: Chasing Debt from Wall Street to the Underworld, who explained that the sale of debt from one party to another is not always done using the most sophisticated means, with it often being simply a list of fields on an Excel spreadsheet.
Oliver, who took his research to the extreme, actually set up his own debt collection company in Mississippi and purchased $15 million worth of debt that was aged beyond the statutory collections period for the bargain price of $60,000. Rather than try to collect on the debt, which he mentioned would not have been illegal, he decided to forgive the debt entirely and set the record for TV’s largest monetary giveaway in the process.
Oliver was careful to remind viewers throughout that while there are a few bad seeds and horror stories, the industry itself is regulated and is not illegal. You can watch the episode below:
Throwback to 2008? Credit Card, Auto Debt Soars to $1 Trillion
May 20, 2016Subprime borrowing is back, this time with auto loans.
Vehicle loans and leases held by subprime consumers increased by 11 percent in Q1 this year and the for the first time since the recession, balances on auto loans hit the $1 trillion mark, up from $905 billion last year.
Non-bank finance companies and credit unions saw the largest spike in loan growth market share with 26 percent and 16 percent respectively.
“With more and more consumers relying on financing, it is important for lenders to keep a close eye on delinquency trends to ensure the market remains healthy,” said Melinda Zabritski, senior director of automotive finance for Experian, which conducted the study.
However there is some respite in the overall percentage of total delinquent loans remains relatively low when compared to pre-recession levels.
And it’s not just auto loans that are soaring, credit card debt is also pushing the $1 trillion mark inching scarily close to recession peak of $1.2 trillion in 2008. According to Federal Reserve numbers, outstanding balances touched $952 billion in the first quarter, up 6 percent last year, and the highest level since August 2009.
Here’s How Much an American Household Owes in Credit Card Debt
April 8, 2016
US credit card debt equals debt of Canada, France, Japan, Mexico, Russia and China put together.
62 percent of Americans are under credit card debt they cannot pay off.
A study by Fifth Third Bank revealed that 70 percent Americans are under debt and financial hardship.
Alarmingly enough, an average American household owes $7,879 in credit card debt alone, the highest since the recession. If that sounds worrisome, there’s more. Yet another survey revealed that recent college graduates choose to remain ignorant about the student loan they owe. Nearly half of them (45 percent) didn’t know what percentage of their salary goes to paying loans and 15 percent of them are unaware of how much they owe.
Key numbers:
- In 2015 alone, credit card debt rose by $71 billion.
- Americans spent $52 billion in the fourth quarter of 2015, mostly due to holiday shopping and this equaled credit card debt during the entire years of 2009, 2010 and 2011 combined.
- The delinquency rates on credit card debt is 2.17 percent, the lowest since 1991.
Some experts might argue that rising credit card debt is a healthy sign of consumer spending. However, that needs to be consistent with wages. America added 242,000 jobs in February but wages took a hit. According to Labor Department statistics, average hourly earnings dropped by 0.1 percent, declining for the first time since December 2014.
Does this portend a warning signal for investors buying loans?
Are Subprime Auto Loans Showing Cracks or Not?
March 19, 2016
Subprime auto delinquencies are even higher now than they were during the height of the most recent recession, according to Fitch Ratings. The 60-day-plus delinquency rate of the subprime loan group that Fitch evaluates reached 5.16% last month, compared to 5.09% in January, 2009.
Fitch attributed this to weaker underwriting standards as well as sharp origination growth and increased competition.
The prime sector is mostly stable, they say. Further weakness is anticipated across all credit categories, though the outlook is stable.
But while Fitch spoke of weaker underwriting and nearly unprecedented delinquencies, consumer credit reporting agency Equifax spun a different picture just four days later when they announced the results of their own auto lending study.
“Lenders are making more informed lending decisions and the underwriting process has been strengthened as a result of new data and technology that is available to the marketplace,” said Amy Crews Cutts, chief economist at Equifax.
Indeed, the rates of both early delinquency and serious delinquency as a percentage of dollar balances are nowhere near recession levels, at least according to Equifax’s data set.
Both Fitch and Equifax agree there has been an increase in auto loan originations.
In a WSJ interview, hedge fund manager Ben Weinger said that demand for auto debt has led lenders to systematically loosen underwriting standards.
Equifax’s Cutts recently said however that “credit performance is still excellent, showing that lenders are prudently extending credit to well-underwritten borrowers.”
Who’s right?
Here’s How Much the American Credit Card Addiction is Worth
February 9, 2016
Of all the addictions Americans could have, credit card debt is one which is measurable monetarily. And as of December 2015, it was $936 billion.
A recent study by the Federal Reserve of Boston revealed that a majority of Americans roll over their debt paying high amounts of interest. Americans racked up $103 billion in debt since April 2011, still less than the $1.02 trillion owed in 2008, Bloomberg reported.
The credit card frenzy that hits people in their 20s is hard to get rid of and as they get older, the reliance on debt only increases. ‘While 20-year-olds use more than half their available credit on average, 50-year-olds use almost 40 percent,’ the article noted.
The study revealed that credit card usage on an individual level doesn’t change much during the course of their life but banks constantly adjust the credit available. ‘The average credit-card limit rose about 40 percent from 2000 to 2008, then plunged about 40 percent during 2009.’ The study also found that when offered a 10 percent increase in credit limits, people who take on revolving debt subsequently increase their debt by 9.99 percent.
CFPB (and others) Not Amused By Quicken’s Push-Button Mortgage Ad
February 9, 2016Is Quicken in the right place at the wrong time?
Imagine a world where you could get a mortgage at the push of a button. And then imagine like literally pushing that button while you’re sitting in a dark auditorium watching a magic show. As the magician saws a woman in half, you agree to a $400,000 loan payable over 30 years. That pivotal moment, according to Quicken’s vision for American prosperity, will lead to a “tidal wave of ownership” that will flood the country with new home owners.
Consider the implications of that commercial on its own merits (or watch it below of course) and then imagine watching it after you’ve just seen The Big Short in theaters. Given that the movie is a true story about the build-up of the housing and credit bubble in the 2000s that led to a near catastrophic global collapse, a mortgage “tidal wave” might not be the best way to describe your new mobile app.
After Quicken’s push-button mortgage commercial aired during the Super Bowl, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau responded on twitter:
When it comes to #mortgages, take your time, ask questions and #knowbeforeyouowe. https://t.co/UUaGyWDbzk
— consumerfinance.gov (@CFPB) February 8, 2016
While the mortgage process shown on TV looked overly ambitious, a Quicken customer service rep who I chatted with while posing as a borrower, said that it really can be all done online, even if the mortgage was for like $600,000. When I inquired about what documents I’d need to provide through that process, I was told all I needed to do was state the address of the home.
A no-doc process?
According to the Wall Street Journal, “borrowers can authorize Quicken to access their bank and other financial information directly, eliminating the need for sending pay stubs, bank statements and tax returns back and forth.” So there’s still documents, they’re just electronic and retrieved via APIs.
Having scanned the process, there is clearly more than just one button to push (I counted 9 steps), but it may actually be possible to get a mortgage while watching a magic show. Apparently a lot of people on twitter don’t think that’s a good thing:
Thanks Rocket Mortgage for thinking the '08 housing crisis needed a sequel
— Wyatt Rasmussen (@Wyatt_Rasmussen) February 8, 2016
Let's start another financial collapse. #RocketMortgage https://t.co/7CkBTGJRPD
— Turney Duff (@turneyduff) February 8, 2016
My kid was playing with my phone and bought 7 houses. I can return those right? #RocketMortgage #SB50
— Tim Murphy (@TimMurphy104) February 8, 2016
Rocket Mortgage: explaining the 2008 financial crisis in one commercial
— Rahul Vedantam (@RahulVedantam) February 8, 2016
This commercial is making an excellent case for a massive real estate bubble. It worked awesome in 2007. #RocketMortgage
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) February 8, 2016
Meanwhile, Rana Foroohar, Assistant Managing Editor and Columnist for Time and Global Economic Analyst for CNN, argued that the backlash is unfounded. “No, the Rocket Mortgage Ad Is Not the Sign of Another Financial Apocalypse,” was the headline of her Time story published on Monday. Her evidence? Nobody can afford a mortgage anyway so there’s nothing to worry about, she basically says.
Private equity firm Blackstone has become the largest buyer of single family homes in the country over the last few years. […] Most ordinary Americans need mortgages to buy real estate; at current housing prices and incomes, it would take a typical family more than twenty years to save even a 10% down payment for a home plus closing costs. But they can’t get the loans, because in our post-crisis world, banks are still keeping credit tighter than usual. Besides, many individuals simply don’t have the secure employment, nest egg, and increasingly high credit scores needed to obtain a mortgage these days.
– Rana Foroohar
http://time.com/4212259/rocket-mortgage-super-bowl-ad/
See? There can’t be a bubble brewing because nobody can possibly qualify.
So when Quicken makes wildly provocative sales pitches like this:
Push Button. Get Mortgage. https://t.co/UzOXYFF25C#RocketMortgage 🚀🚀🚀
— Quicken Loans (@QuickenLoans) February 8, 2016
What they’re really apparently trying to say is that the process for those that qualify is supposedly more transparent and therefore better for borrowers:
.@CFPB We agree. No better way than #RocketMortgage for full transparency into mortgage options & info needed to make the right decision.
— Quicken Loans (@QuickenLoans) February 8, 2016
Of course, it probably doesn’t help when their legal help page is titled “legal mumbo jumbo.”

Quicken CEO Bill Emerson tried to clarify the message of the commercial to the WSJ. “What we’re saying is that a strong housing market filled with responsible homeowners is important to the economy,” he said.
Don’t worry about the mumbo jumbo folks, just push button, get mortgage.
—
What do you think? Is Quicken walking down a slippery slope?
Bernie Sanders Poses Bad Lending Question
December 27, 2015Two loans: one with collateral, the other without any. All else being the same, which one do you think would have the higher interest rate?
Given his tweet, Socialist (Democrat) candidate Bernie Sanders might not understand the question.
You have families out there paying 6, 8, 10 percent on student debt but you can refinance your homes at 3 percent. What sense is that?
— Bernie Sanders (@SenSanders) December 26, 2015
The twitterverse was quick to pounce on him for it:
@SenSanders I like you but you have to understand collateralized debt
— Greg Wissinger (@gwiss) December 26, 2015
@SenSanders
A bank can repossess a house. They can't repossess your brain if you quit paying student loans. Though, you make me wonder.
— Smittie (@smittie61984) December 26, 2015
@SenSanders Collateralized vs non collateralized loan. But you knew that already.
— enargins (Neil) (@enargins) December 26, 2015
@SenSanders it makes perfect sense. A 'home' is collateral which the bank can take possession of in case of default. m/t @KurtSchlichter
— All-American Male (@chrisbraly) December 26, 2015
@SenSanders astonishing how you can run president and not understand this basic understanding of collateral.
— Wittorical (@Wittorical) December 26, 2015
@SenSanders I'm generally on your side, but mortgages are secured debt whereas student loans are unsecured and don't always increase income.
— Don Edwards (@DMEdwards) December 26, 2015
@SenSanders wow, big display of stupidity here. The house has resale value. Can we sell people now if they don't pay?
— Ms. Parker (@CaseyParksIt) December 26, 2015
To be fair, student loans might be unsecured debt but they can’t be discharged in bankruptcy. There’s also ways for debt collectors to garnish a paycheck to pay them back. That’s entirely dependent on the borrower generating income though and likely means a substantially longer repayment period. In a famous op-ed by Lee Siegel in the NY Times titled, Why I Defaulted on My Student Loans however, it is apparently possible to just avoid the debt altogether (and apparently feel okay about it).
With stories like that it’s easy to understand why a loan secured by a home would cost less than a loan secured by someone’s willingness and ability to pay. And in the case of Bernie Sanders, a candidate who believes college should be free for everyone, it’s tough to say if his question was really just rhetoric meant to stir up his base or a serious one in which he really doesn’t understand how the underwriting of loans work.
Either way, many people are worried:
.@SenSanders doesn't understand why having collateral would account for a lower interest rate. And people want to make him president?
— Caleb Cassel (@CalebCassel) December 27, 2015






























