Sean Murray


Articles by Sean Murray

rss feed

deBanked App for iPhone Now Available

April 9, 2015
Article by:

The deBanked app for iPhone is now available in the iTunes app store. The app allows you to communicate with other industry professionals with ease.

deBanked iPhone app


debanked app

debanked iphone app

debanked forum

I hope to see you there.

Rand Paul Accepts Bitcoin

April 7, 2015
Article by:

rand paul bitcoinBitcoin’s got a real fan! Senator Rand Paul is now accepting bitcoin as one way to attract donations for his presidential campaign. And regardless of whether or not you agree with his views, I did at the very least make a donation on the basis that I am a believer in bitcoin.

Donating to Paul’s campaign by bitcoin is one of three payment options. The other two are credit card and paypal. He is able to accept bitcoin via BitPay, a company I just mentioned a few days ago.

How would I describe the experience of donating to Rand Paul for president using bitcoin?

Insanely simple!

By law, Paul will have to convert any bitcoins received into dollars before using them. Too bad…

bitcoin

Lending Club Failure Has Shocking Twist

April 7, 2015
Article by:

explicit contentOne general rule about meeting with a banker to apply for a loan is to not present yourself like a slob. That means dress professionally, comb your hair, trim your nails, sit up straight, be polite and sound as sophisticated as you possibly can. Then maybe, just maybe you might be seriously considered for an approval.

Well, things work a little bit differently out on the Internet. One applicant decided to try the opposite approach with Lending Club and their words became public record when the offering got registered with the SEC. Take a look:

(It’s okay if this photo is hard to see, we zoom in 2 images down)

Lending Club fail

Just another D-grade note offering a 19.05% return. Oh wait…

lending club fail


Look closer at the applicant’s answers…

lending club loan answers

Congratulations, you just fast tracked yourself to the rejection bin! Oh wait, what’s that? You can check the loan number on the filing with the public data on Lending Club?…

lending club fail funded

Umm…

Lending Club failure funded

Behold the power of online lending!

F you, F that, Don’t waste my time with this sh*t and send me the damn $29,000.

Sounds good to me! It was 100% funded and the borrower is currently in good standing. They are already halfway through their 5-year loan.

I honestly don’t know what to make of this. What’s crazier? The fact that 256 investors contributed money to it or the fact that the borrower is in good standing halfway into the 5-year loan?

You can find the original registered security here. Just search for the f bomb.

Yes, Rising Rates Will Impact Alternative Lenders

April 6, 2015
Article by:

rising ratesOn April 1st, Ari Levy of CNBC posed the question, “what do rising rates mean for online lenders?

Right now, everyone’s lending so much that it’s hard to keep up with. There’s a waiting list for institutional investors to deploy capital into these platforms and even retail investors have been drawn away from stocks to earn 5% – 12% a year on risky three to five year notes.

To be frank, borrowers aren’t necessarily choosing alternative lenders over banks because of the rates. The ease of getting a loan online is part of the attraction. But even if the lending platforms raise their rates and the borrowers stick around, will the investors?

Peter Renton, founder of Lend Academy told Levy, “Nothing below 2 percent [federal funds rate] is much of a concern.”

According to the WSJ, Fed officials have estimated the federal funds rate to be 3.125% in 2017. That’s above Renton’s 2% threshold. This rise will inevitably translate into higher national savings account rates, which currently yield below 1% on average. There are definitely price points that will flush out retail investors from investing in platform notes.

Remember that around 2006, banks like HSBC were paying 5.5% APY. If such a scenario were to happen again, even if five years from now, how likely is it that a retail investor would place capital in an exotic, risky, and relatively illiquid 3-5 year note? I think the average retail investor would be willing to sacrifice a few percentage points and go for the absolute safety of an FDIC-insured account. I know I would.

It’s already possible to earn over 2% in a 5-year FDIC-insured CD. It’s not enticing yet but it’s getting warmer.

Given the choice between a 5% 5-year FDIC-insured CD and an 8-10% 5-year note backed by the full faith and credit of some dude on the Internet that needed a loan to pay for his medical expenses, I’m probably going with the CD. But with a savings account right now earning less than 1% and CDs barely earning more than that, right now my moneys riding on some dude.

– Myself

The allure of a Lending Club, Prosper, or note of any other marketplace lender is especially attractive right now because a savings account is where money goes to die. There’s stocks of course but there will always be stocks. They’re actually a good way to complement a portfolio in marketplace loan notes for diversity. A safe investment at present basically earns nothing so the average joe has an incentive to play around with alternative lending.

Just two months ago, Jorge Newberry, the Founder & Chief Executive Officer of American Homeowner Preservation LLC, declared peer-to-peer lending dead in his Huffington Post blog. His basis was that it’s all institutional investors doing the lending to peers now, instead of their actual peers. Give the remaining peers on the platforms a safer more liquid investment with an acceptable yield and the notion of peer-to-peer lending could be deader than dead.

First, disco bit the dust. Then, punk rock keeled over. Now, peer-to-peer lending has been annihilated. Who murdered P2P? Wall Street. BlackRock. Wealthy bankers. The guys I was shoulder-to-shoulder with last week in Las Vegas. At ABS Vegas 2015, billed as the largest capital markets conference in the world, the P2P/Online Lending 101 session attracted a Standing Room Only crowd.

However, this crowd was not made up of peers. These were killers.

-Jorge Newberry

As for short term business lenders and merchant cash advance companies, the turn time of an investment might only be six to twelve months. You’re not locked in for five years and the yields are typically better than consumer lending notes. There’s plenty of incentives for a retail investor who is syndicating to stick around even if rates rise.

And that brings me to the institutions lending to alternative lenders. I don’t know how much institutional investors expect to earn on consumer notes, but I have heard in the merchant cash advance industry that borrowing costs for the funders themselves can range from 8% to 18% APR. They might borrow money from a hedge fund for example.

That partially explains why costs to merchants are high, but it’s uncertain as to whether or not the institutions will just be able to raise their rates and pass along the increase or if there will be new yield opportunities elsewhere with less risk more fitting to their fancy.

My belief is that rising rates will indeed impact alternative lenders and retail investors will probably find safer places for their money pretty early on. As to what the institutional investors will tolerate and who can weather passed on cost increases without being hurt is yet to be seen.

Merchant Cash Advance Was at Transact ’15

April 4, 2015
Article by:

The payments crowd was no doubt in the house at Transact ’15, but if you were wondering if there was anything else going on, check it out:



GRP Funding





Transact 15

Read: Is the MCA Industry Reverting Back to 2005?

BitPay Right at Home at Transact ’15

April 3, 2015
Article by:

bitpay gallippiBitPay has a knack for flair. They sponsored a college bowl game known as The Bitcoin Bowl in St. Petersburg as well as a driver in the NASCAR Camping World Truck Series race. BitPay is bitcoin, but all grown up.

As a member of the ETA and with a business model similar to just about every other card processing acquirer, BitPay didn’t really look too out of place. At a press briefing on April 1st at Transact ’15, company co-founder Tony Gallippi sat in between Osama Bedier of Poynt and Joan Herbig of ControlScan to discuss the road ahead for payments.

Gallipi explained that they are working to integrate with POS platforms so that merchants can accept bitcoin using their existing systems. He also sought to dispel the myth that bitcoin is an untraceable currency by citing the bombshell news report published by the New York Times just the day earlier that revealed government agents had been caught stealing bitcoins.

“The agents, Carl Mark Force IV, who worked for the Drug Enforcement Administration, and Shaun W. Bridges, who worked for the Secret Service, had resigned amid growing scrutiny, and on Monday they were charged with money laundering and wire fraud,” The story states. The agents stole bitcoins recovered in the Silk Road case and laundered it. But since bitcoin is the perfect opposite of untraceable, both agents were caught.


Referring later to the phenomenon of using your mobile device to make a payment, Gallippi said, “a lot of the difficulty in changing is just muscle memory. We’re all so used to just reaching for our wallet to make a payment.”

While BitPay wore a good corporate face for the conference, news that their sponsorship of future college bowl games had been terminated hit the press right in the middle of it. According to Fortune, “neither side is talking about the abruptly ended sponsorship, but it likely has to do with the value of the game, and the value of bitcoin.”

That doesn’t sound good for BitPay, but it may have come down to whether or not it was a good use of their marketing budget. For one, their company name wasn’t even attached to the bowl title. It was the Bitcoin Bowl not the BitPay Bowl. But at least their one run was a moment to remember.

Hopefully BitPay will still be going strong at Transact ’16 next year.

How Syndication Has Made Millions for Partners

April 3, 2015
Article by:

merchant cash advance syndication“How Syndication Has Made Millions for Partners” is a subtitle I borrowed from Strategic Funding Source’s print periodical, The Business Strategist. In the article penned by Ben Johnston, the company’s Chief Strategy Officer, the story how of syndication made its way into the merchant cash advance industry is explained in detail.

Of notable mention is that Strategic has had over 200 syndicate partners co-invest over $260 million of their own money into funded deals. That’s more than a quarter billion dollars from syndicates.

Their platform, which was the first one to operate on scalable level, provides same day payments to syndicates and access to detailed reports on a daily basis.

“Peer-to-peer lending and crowdfunding have become hot topics in the financial industry,” the article concludes. “But Strategic Funding Source has been crowdfunding with its own peers for years.”

A Return to the Fundamentals? (At Transact 15)

April 3, 2015
Article by:

transact 15The Transact ’15 conference opened to a record crowd and there was no shortage of merchant cash advance players in attendance. Those facts were to be expected. And if you walked in and poked your head around, you might not have noticed anything to be different. Payment processors touted the latest mobile technology and at every turn security systems were being offered to prevent catastrophic breaches of cardholder data.

Everything looked normal… except the merchant cash advance companies.

Back to the fundamentals

Early on Wednesday, April 1st, CAN Capital kicked off a product announcement by raffling off free Apple watches. CAN’s new product is called TrakLoan, a revolutionary new loan program that allows merchants to repay via a split percentage of their credit card sales instead of fixed ACH.

April Fools?

The described advantage of TrackLoan is that there is no fixed term and that merchants only pay back at the pace that they generate card sales. Wait, Where have I heard of this before?

After slapping myself across the face a few times to make sure I hadn’t teleported to the year 2005, the rip in the space time continuum grew more apparent at the after parties.

Card processors Integrity Payment Systems, North American Bancard and Priority Payment systems are still among the hottest names in town for splits. The veteran MCA ISOs and funders are still boarding hoards of merchant accounts with them every month and are therefore building multi-million dollar residual portfolios in the process. It makes one wonder why so many people have turned their back on split-deals for the ACH methodology.

Years ago, merchant cash advance was a sideshow value-add that could be used to acquire what really mattered and what was reliably profitable, merchant accounts. Not everyone has forgotten that however.

the business strategistOver at Strategic Funding Source, Vice President Hellen McQuain is heading up a new merchant services division. In The Business Strategist, an SFS periodical, McQuain speaks the native tongue of the payments industry: EMV, PCI, NFC, etc.. Few, if any, of today’s new entrants in merchant cash advance could identify what those acronyms stand for, let alone explain the current climate of adoption.

So, is it time to get back to the basics?

Over the last six months, I have heard more gripes from funders about how to align a broker’s interest with theirs, other than by offering the opportunity to syndicate of course. The question comes down to, how can you get a broker to care about the outcome of a deal?

The answer should be obvious. Pay half the commission upfront and the other half as part of an ongoing performance residual. That gives the broker a stake in the outcome without having to syndicate. This is not a novel idea. This was how the entire industry operated from 2005 to 2011.

Might brokers resist such a compensation plan today in an upfront-only world? Maybe. But the greatest resistance I sense from funders, especially new ones, is that automated residual payments are too complicated for their current accounting systems.

That of course begs another question. How can this possibly be? Despite the rapid growth in technology, there is an entire segment of the industry that is ill-equipped to handle transactions that were commonplace and scalable five years ago.

While today’s systems are impressive, there are times when it seems like yesterday’s advanced technology was lost in a great flood, along with all the scientific texts documenting how to build the powerful machines.

To add to this, some of today’s edgy ideas are not new. A monthly payment loan for example is not an innovative idea. Weekly payments might acquire the merchant that wouldn’t do daily payments. And monthly payments might get the merchant that wouldn’t do weekly payments. These stretched out programs might make you popular with merchant cash advance brokers that are used to selling daily payment products, but they’re in no way new. It’s a return to the basics.

In 2015 we may apparently be going full circle.

we have to go back