Regulation
House Small Business Committee to Hold Hearing on Online Lending
October 22, 2017On Thursday, October 26th, a House subcommittee on Economic Growth, Tax and Capital Access will be holding a hearing about online lending’s role in improving small business capital access.
The two witnesses scheduled to testify are Kate Fisher, a partner at Hudson Cook, and William Phelan, the president and co-founder of PayNet.
deBanked will attempt to stream the hearing LIVE on our home page. It begins at 10 AM EST in the Rayburn House Office Building.
CFPB’s Small Business Lending RFI is Now Closed
September 18, 2017The window to share your two cents on the CFPB’s quest to collect data on small business lending has closed. The extended deadline to respond to the RFI was September 14th.
The agency received 2,668 comments, 650 of which you can read online. Most responses that deBanked reviewed asked the CFPB to exempt certain businesses such as community banks from the law. Others denounced the CFPB’s objective as misguided or poorly thought-out from the get-go.
Nevertheless, Section 1071 of the 2009 Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act directed the CFPB to collect data on small business lending presumably to determine if women and minorities are treated differently.
Some observers expected this initiative to be derailed when Richard Cordray, the Director of the CFPB, resigned to campaign for Governor of Ohio. However, the governor’s race is now in full swing and he has yet to resign, and could now possibly remain in his position until it expires next year.
The implementation of any resulting rule from the RFI would likely not take place until some time in the 2020s, sources contend.
Senate Banking Committee to Hold Hearing on Fintech
September 12, 2017The US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, & Urban Affairs held a hearing entitled “Examining the Fintech Landscape” on Tuesday morning at 10 AM.
You can watch it below
The witnesses include:
Mr. Lawrance Evans
Director, Financial Markets
U.S. Government Accountability Office
Mr. Eric Turner
Research Analysis
S&P Global Market Intelligence
Mr. Frank Pasquale
Professor of Law
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Was Section 1071 of Dodd-Frank a Massive Mistake?
August 23, 2017Did Congress make a huge mistake by thinking small business loans were easily commoditized?
Pursuant to Section 1071 of Dodd-Frank, the CFPB is planning to collect data from companies engaged in small business finance in order to potentially screen for discrimination against women and minorities. Before deciding how exactly they’re going to do that, they’ve asked the public for comment, and the public… isn’t showing the law much love. Below are some excerpts of the nearly 300 responses already submitted.
We can tell all the stories we want, and hold all the hearings imaginable, and there is still no way to disguise the fact that implementing a HMDA-like reporting requirement will add cost, complexity, and rigidity to our amazingly customized lending
– Alan Gay
A loan priced properly for the risk may be acceptable for one institution and not acceptable to another. For example a client requests funds to open their second doughnut shop in town. One bank declines the loan because they do not specialize in food service business per lending policy and the banks appetite for risk. Another bank would consider the loan, however after reviewing the current competition decides that the market is saturated and the loan is too risky based on the three competitors within five miles. The third bank is willing to loan the money based on the cash flow of the owner and her husband, but will not take into account the expected cash flow from the business, and will require the collateral to include the primary residence of the client. The fourth bank is an SBA lender and proposes the client use the SBA program to mitigate the risk for the bank. The fifth bank declines the loan due to cash flows. They will not consider the revenues from the new location, because it is considered a start-up business. As I understand it the CFPB will collect the data from all five banks to determine “Fair Lending” similar to the consumer lending program. I find this problematic on many levels: I believe in the scenario presented all the lenders were fair. The data is redundant and will not show the result of credit search on the commercial loan request or accurate results.
– Doug Mitchell
Creating additional documentation and regulation only makes those in Congress and the CFPB feel better without truly adding benefit to our community and it’s businesses.
– Joseph Williams
COLLECTING AND AGGREGATING THIS INFORMATION WOULD BE A BURDEN THAT WOULD REQUIRE ADDITIONAL STAFF AND NOT CHANGE OUR HISTORY AND BUSINESS MANDATE OF SERVING OUR SMALL TOWN BUSINESSES.
– Dee Baertsch
As a community banker in rural Ohio I strongly urge the repeal of Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act. The addition of another report will be counterproductive to lending to small businesses.
– Chuck Dixon
Commercial lending is a completely different animal from consumer lending, and has so many different aspects to consider. While a consumer loan is typically viewed from and ability and intent to pay by reviewing a consumer credit score and debt to income calculation, a commercial loan is viewed from not only current earnings but also projected earnings, the economic conditions surrounding the specific business/industry, competitiveness in the market, and the speed of obsolescence of the business’ products and services. It is so much more than pulling a credit report and getting the last two pay stubs.
– Brian Smith
The Race and Sex questions should be eliminated from all loans.
– David Ludwig
Our bank in particular will be unduly burdened by small business lending data collection.
– Casey D. Lewis, CRCM, First Bank & Trust
This new requirement will place a large burden on our small bank and staff as more time will be spent on data collection and reporting rather than giving the value added service to our actual customers. It also may increase the cost of credit to our borrowers in order to offset the increased compliance cost to comply.
– Anita Drentlaw
These regulation proposed by the CFPB will only act to hamper and restrict our ability to continue meet the credit need of our communities and will not provide any meaningful benefit to anyone.
– Jim Goetz
Adding new requirements to collect and report data related to these loans much like HMDA diverts time of our limited staff away from serving our customer needs and expends resources that do not help our community.
– James Milroy
The last thing I need is to spend even more of my time collecting data similar to the HMDA data we collect on other loans. It is a timely, costly and inefficient use of our resources which could be better utilized for spending more time with potential and current customers and lowering their interest rates. Very few businesses are the same which would lead to misrepresentation and baseless fair lending complaints.
– Daniel Mueller
By making our jobs harder, you are making it harder for small businesses to thrive.
– Joy Blum
I have seen first hand the negative effects of the HMDA collection and reporting to our bank. The increased work for our small bank has driven up our costs and is making it harder for us to compete. In addition to the negative impact on our bank mortgage customers pay a cost and as more and more community banks decide they can no longer provide these services the community will be left with fewer options.
– Jeff Southcott
Stop all the paper work to get a commercial loan. Enough is Enough!
– Jeff Spitzack
We are a small $65 Million dollar bank with limited personnel now being asked to police another segment of our customer base. We do not have the resources to carry out more regulatory burden.
– Girard J. Hoel, Chairman, The Miners National Bank of Eveleth
Commercial lending cannot be “commoditized” in the way that consumer lending can, nor can it be subject to simplified, rigid analysis which may generate baseless fair lending complaints.
– Steve Worrell
We are so heavily burdened with keeping up with all the changing regulations and requirements, it would be very burdensome for not only our bank, but many other community banks. There has to be a way to ensure the end results that you are looking to achieve without making it so hard on Community Banks. We feel that we have to really analyze if it is cost prohibitive to actually make the loan – and how does that help the small businesses?
– Margi Fleming
We would never decline a profit making loan because of the race or sex of the applicant. You would be appalled to know how little attention borrowers pay to the dozens of pages of disclosures required by regulation. Over disclosure is no disclosure.
– Douglas Krogh
Community banks simply do not have numbers on our side, either in manpower or funding, to seamlessly and efficiently absorb the vast and sweeping regulatory changes.
– Cheryl Hiller, 1st National Bank of Scotia
The new data collection will add additional staff at our institution. This salary will be passed on in the form of origination fees or increased rates to our small business customers. This is not fair to them, but with the increased regulatory demands by the CFPB on small business lending if this is adopted will increase their borrowing cost.
– Russell Laffitte
The burden of data collection and reporting would in effect end up costing our customers more to get a loan.
– Shannon Fuller
This tracking will be onerous on a small bank that stays competitive by maintaining a small staff like ours
– Jim Legare
Section 1071 will have a chilling effect on lenders’ ability to price for risk. This, in addition to the expense of data collection and reporting, may impact community banks’ ability to provide affordable commercial lending products and curb access to small business credit, an engine of local economic growth and job creation.
– Freeman Park
Please make every effort to prevent the added burden to small business lending and community bank processes by repealing Section 1071 of the Dodd Frank Act.
– Julie Goll
The Employee Suing SoFi Only Worked There for Three Months
August 15, 2017On Monday, several news outlets reported that a former employee of SoFi was suing for wrongful termination after he not only reported sexual harassment in the workplace, but also exposed an internal loan cancellation scheme designed to pad the bonuses of certain employees.
According to the complaint, which you can read for yourself here, plaintiff Brandon Charles learned of the loan scheme within 2 weeks of being hired and was fired only 3 months later in June of this year.
According to The New York Times, Charles’ attorney said he expects to bring another lawsuit, a class action, against SoFi next week for broad mistreatment of employees.
These events come just as SoFi had started teasing about a possible IPO in the near future.
You can read Brandon Charles’ complaint here and reach your own conclusions.
The CFPB is Asking The Wrong Questions, Bank President Says
July 13, 2017David Ludwig, the Bismarck branch president of Security First Bank of North Dakota, responded to the CFPB’s small business lending RFI earlier this week. In his written comment, he points out the futility of examining race, gender and ethnicity to judge how a lender is approving business loans. These data points are what the CFPB is hoping to gather pursuant to Section 1071 of Dodd-Frank to examine potential discrimination.
“The bureau appears to only want to know the applicants’ income, sex, race, amount of request and if the loan was approved or not,” he wrote. “Some people have less education, less ability, less equity and not so good credit history. These are not sex or race issues.”
Ludwig says there is no place for discrimination in lending and that if the CFPB was really interested in attributes about business owners that may be impacting their approvals, they should be asking about the owners’ work history, education, equity in the business, loan purpose and other related questions.
CFPB’s New Arbitration Rule Does Not Apply to Business Loans
July 10, 2017The CFPB’s new rule to regulate arbitration clauses in consumer finance contracts does not apply to business loans, according to the agency’s fine print. Page 403 of 775 (that’s how long the rule is) includes a footnote that says:
As is explained in proposed comment 3(a)(1)(i)-1, Regulation B defines “credit” by reference to persons who meet the definition of “creditor” in Regulation B. Persons who do not regularly participate in credit decisions in the ordinary course of business, for example, are not creditors as defined by Regulation B. 12 CFR 1002.2(l). In addition, by proposing to cover only credit that is “consumer credit” under Regulation B, the Bureau was making clear that the proposal would not have applied to business loans.
Watch the video on what the CFPB’s rule is about below:
CFPB Pushes Back Small Business Lending Comment Deadline
July 7, 2017The CFPB has pushed back its small business lending comment deadline from July 14th to September 14th. The Request for Information is the first step of its initiative to monitor business loans to women and minorities, as directed by Section 1071 of Dodd-Frank.
Only 15 comments have been submitted so far, a number likely too small to even be helpful to the CFPB. Nonetheless, the comments have been overwhelmingly negative with respondents mostly asking to be exempt from the law or to repeal it.
The Director of Business Lending at a credit union for example, said that the law “puts our staff in the unenviable and unfair position of making an assessment of a borrower’s ethnicity when this information is not provided as if often the choice.” Between that and the cost burden of compliance, he also said his credit union is seriously considering the discontinuance of all small business lending going forward.
The total and complete discontinuance of small business lending is probably not what legislators wanted when they wrote the law.
Prior to that, the Puerto Rico Bankers Association questioned the value of spending big bucks to collect data on minorities when 99% of Puerto Rico’s residents are legally classified as minorities. “The potential complexity and cost of compliance with the minority-owned businesses data collection and reporting requirements of Section 704(B), will impose on our banks an unintended and unreasonable burden,” they said in their public comment.