CFC on the Front Lines of the MCA Regulation Battle

November 6, 2017
Article by:

Capitol Building

As the US Senate attempts to reach a bipartisan agreement on relaxing some of the rules in the Dodd Frank legislation of 2010 that would treat banks more favorably, the MCA industry is having to fend off legislation and regulation of its own at the state and federal levels that could position funders in a similarly crippling position.

MCA regulation has been thrust into the spotlight for a number of reasons, not the least of which has been the Consumer Financial Production Bureau (CFPB). The CFPB is moving forward with the Dodd-Frank Section 1071 rulemaking process for data collection regarding small business lending, a sector of the market for which they do not have jurisdiction, sources say.

Front and center in the policy discussions has been the Commercial Finance Coalition (CFC), a merchant cash advance trade association that is coming up on its two-year anniversary in December. While federal policymakers appear to be listening, state legislatures have been a more difficult nut to crack.

The CFC’s Influence

In its short two-year history, the CFC has been one of the most vocal if not the most influential trade organization lobbying on behalf of the MCA industry, having attended 70 congressional meetings and having led advocacy efforts for the industry in the halls of Albany, Sacramento, Illinois and Washington, D.C.

Dan Gans
Dan Gans, executive director, CFC

Dan Gans, executive director of the CFC, has been the voice of the MCA industry on Capitol Hill and has been invited to testify in key congressional hearings. “For whatever reason, the CFC has really become the voice and has taken an active part in the so far successful advocacy efforts to educate and mitigate potential harm to our members’ ability to deploy capital to small businesses that need access,” Gans told deBanked.

Most recently the CFC participated in a fly-in, one of two such events this year, to Washington, D.C. in which the association’s counsel Katherine Fisher of Hudson Cook, LLP testified.

In her testimony Fisher said: “The MCA and commercial lending spaces are sufficiently regulated by existing federal and state laws and regulations. Both MCA companies and commercial lenders must comply with laws and regulations affecting nearly every aspect of their transactions, from marketing and underwriting through servicing and collection.”

Katherine Fisher, partner, Hudson Cook, LLP
Katherine Fisher, partner, Hudson Cook, LLP

She went on to explain: “Even if they comply with every applicable law and regulation, small business financers must also be wary of the Federal Trade Commission’s powerful authority to prevent unfair or deceptive acts or practices.”

Fisher told deBanked she received a “positive” response to her testimony from funders but has not heard anything from lawmakers.

Gans said Fisher did a fantastic job in articulating the needs and status of the industry.

“She presented a very good case as to why the industry is currently adequately regulated. We don’t feel there is a need for federal regulation. In some cases, less regulation would allow our members to deploy more capital and help more small businesses,” Gans said.

The sweet spot for MCAs, Gans explained, are transactions under $100,000 and probably in the $24,000 – $40,000 range. He said the industry does a fantastic job of being able to deploy financial resources to small businesses in a timely manner that neither banks nor SBA lenders can match. He’s not suggesting MCA is for everybody but for some businesses it’s an essential product that can help. There have been many success stories.

“Competition is all over the place. But that’s great for the merchant. The more options that merchants have, the more we can enforce best practices and more competitive rates. And the more we can keep the government from impeding people from getting into this space, the better off small businesses are going to be,” said Gans.

Setting the Record Straight

The CFC was formed with the mindset that the organization, which is currently comprised of CEOs of small- and medium-sized funders, would take a proactive rather than a reactive approach to industry regulation. In its two-year history the CFC has tasked itself not only with educating policymakers on the role of MCA funders for small businesses but also with undoing the misinformation and misconception surrounding the anatomy of an MCA.

“Unfortunately, because MCA uses the term cash advance in its product name, uninformed people will often confuse MCA as some form of payday lending. And so that has been one of our biggest challenges, educating members of congress and committees that there is absolutely no correlation between MCA products and what their views of consumer payday loans is,” said Gans, adding that the CFC has had to communicate that MCA is a version of factoring has been around for more than 1,000 years.

Watch a recording of the subcommittee hearing where Fisher testified below


A common thread that the CFC has been able to weave with lawmakers has been the diverse geographical representation of both the trade group and the House and Senate.

“Most venture capital is deployed in a few spots – New York, California and Texas – and it’s a cliff to get to those three states. So, one nice thing that I take pride in is my members are looking all around the country regardless of the geographic location. That helps us with policymakers, most of whom are not from the New York City metropolitan area or Silicon Valley. It’s nice being able to look at them in the eye and tell them we care just as much about your district as you do,” he said.

The Road Ahead

The CFC has an ambitious long-term agenda, one that includes raising their profile in the industry and participating in events.

“I think one of the ambitions we have is to have an organization where funders and brokers can be at the same table and work though some of the issues impacting the industry and try to make sure people are doing things in the right and best way.”

The trade group is planning to partner up with deBanked for Broker Fair 2018 and they’re looking to bolster membership.

“The industry has had a lot of free riders that are benefiting from our advocacy efforts but not supporting it. So, from my perspective, if you’re in this industry, particularly in the MCA space, we’d like to expand membership. If we grow our membership, we can do more things, engage more states and expand our lobbying team,” said Gans. “The more members we have, the more we can do to advance the ball and protect the interests of the industry.”

The CFC will need all the help it can muster given the fight ahead to fend off regulation particularly in Washington, Albany and Sacramento. “I think we could see some harmful regulations and potentially legislation over time. Some of those bad ideas that emanate in states have a tendency to percolate into Washington. If at some point there is a less business-friendly administration in the future, we could see all those ideas get some traction at the federal level,” Gans warned.

View From The C-Suite: Alternative Funding Execs Talk Shop, The Landscape, And The Future

October 30, 2017
Article by:

Board roomAlternative funders have had a roller coaster 2017 with highs and lows that will likely be remembered as a high-stakes time for the industry, one in which the rubber met the road for many and the market landscape shifted for everyone from funders, to merchants to brokers.

Three C-Suite executives in the alternative funding space — Christine Chang, CEO of 6th Avenue Capital, Heather Francis, CEO of Elevate Funding and Torrie Inouye, National Funding president — spoke with deBanked, offering their take on some of the industry shakeups, direction of the alt lending space and upcoming developments at their respective companies.

All three execs are embracing what appears to be shaping up as a bigger and better 2018 with plans on the horizon for new products, relationships and deals but also where there could be further shakeout as the shift in the industry landscape takes hold.

Industry Landscape

6th Avenue Capital, provides short-term funding to merchants that Chang describes as “high touch, high tech and fast.” The company is building an SEC RIA compliant infrastructure as Chang believes that MCA regulation will take place over the next several years. Chang said she is sympathetic to the banks and the onerous rules that they must follow, and whatever form the industry regulation eventually takes on, the company will be ready for.

Christine Chang - 6th Avenue Capital
Christine Chang, CEO, 6th Avenue Capital

A recent story in The Wall Street Journal points to community banks comprised of those with less than $10 billion in assets historically funding local merchants in what’s dubbed character-based lending. As the name suggests, the underwriting standard for the loans was tied to the character of the business owner, which the lender knew based on personal relationships in their own communities.

The financial crisis gave rise to greater regulation, driving a spike in that model and the rest is history. Small banks were forced to direct their resources toward risk management and compliance instead of adding more personnel to service loans. The WSJ quotes a small business lender that bears repeating: “When they created too big to fail, they also created too small to succeed.”

When that door closed, however, another one opened, creating the opportunity for alt lenders to service a niche that was getting left out in the cold.

“The alternative funding industry is here to stay. That’s good news for MCA and fintech in general. There’s a need for fast funding and there will continue to be a trend toward that,” said Chang.

“THE ALTERNATIVE FUNDING INDUSTRY IS HERE TO STAY”


Banks, meanwhile, have started coming to the fintech table to compete for deals. “We’re in the process of speaking to a number of banks, some quite large and some regional, that have expressed an interest. We think this is a great opportunity for them. The idea is that we’d help them to serve a population of clients that they would not otherwise be able to serve,” said Chang.

6th Avenue has had discussions about white labeling and customizing the platform for institutions. “We would run everything for them,” said Chang.

In addition to possible new banking relationships, 6th Avenue Capital, backed by a private family and institutional investors, will expand the business model to include more investors on its platform. “We are in discussions with a number of significant international investors. It’s in the works. We’re building an institutional infrastructure, so it was always contemplated,” she said.

Elevate Funding, whose is 100% referral-based and whose product suite is comprised of a trio of MCA solutions, is coming up on its three-year anniversary in December.

“When I created Elevate, I did it with the purpose of providing a product to high-risk merchants. That’s who we deal with. We’re not dealing with credit scores. There is a level of risk to who we work with. Elevate was created to provide a product that is going to fit their needs and also provide a product that doesn’t treat them like they’re high risk. That’s who we are,” said Francis.

Heather Francis
Heather Francis, CEO, Elevate Funding

Gainesville, FL-based Elevate recently hired Michael Gaura to spearhead a new MCA product that the company is rolling out in 2018. Francis held the details of the new funding product close to the vest, but she did offer her views on the direction of the MCA and alternative lending space.

“I see difficulty in the coming years, especially in 2018, for qualified lead flow. You have a lot of big banks that are getting into this industry. And that’s a lot of marketing dollars that you’re competing against.”

She points to JPMorgan Chase, American Express, Square and PayPal, saying they are “huge marketing dollar companies” with tremendous access to customers on their respective platforms.

“There’s going to be a shakeout of what can you reach, who can you reach, can you get them the first time? How do you engage them to where they only want to work with you and they’re not submitting 20 applications for every website they come across?”, Francis said.

San Diego, Calif.-based National Funding is a balance sheet lender whose primary product is loans, not MCAs. The broker factor has changed significantly for the lender in a very positive way this year. “We’re really seeing sizeable growth in our broker channel in 2017 and have designed a strong and consistent process for our broker clients” Inouye said. The leads have been driven by a variety of factors, not the least of which comes down to CAN Capital and Bizfi’s loss being National Funding’s gain.

“WE DEFINITELY SAW AN UPTICK IN BUSINESS WHEN THEY LEFT THE SPACE”


Torrie Inouye, National Funding
Torrie Inouye, President, National Funding

“That’s a factor we can’t ignore. The broker community has rewarded us for being consistent and building those relationships and being a partner to them,” Inouye said. “We definitely saw an uptick in business when they left the space. I can say we’ve continually experienced sizeable growth in our broker channel year over year but 2017 was beyond what we had expected. It surpassed other years.”

Incidentally, National Funding was one of the earliest alt funders on the scene along with CAN Capital in the 1990s. CAN’s fate started unraveling about this time a year ago.

“It’s not positive when you see that happen in the industry. However, we are really focused on what we’re doing and the decisions we’re making internally. I think that’s why we’ve consistently had profitable growth over the years. We’ve stayed true to our underwriting principles and the market seems to have rewarded us. We were consistent and not erratic. Brokers know they can rely on us and feel confident that we would quickly fund their deal once we issued an approval,” said Inouye.

The Broker Effect

Elevate, a balance sheet funder, relies on outside brokers and referrals for deals. “I don’t find it a disadvantage for us not having an internal sales team. A lot of companies in this space have the ability for a chief marketing officer who focuses entirely on leads. Elevate isn’t there yet. Will we be there in five years? Maybe. Marketing can change by that time,” Francis said.

6th Avenue Capital welcomes relationships with brokers as well. “We have an in-house business development team that works with brokers. 6th Avenue Capital is also considering direct sales in niche strategies in its future,” said Chang.

6th Avenue Capital has a starter program in which there are no guarantees but considers businesses that have been in existence for less than a year and businesses with credit scores of 500 or more. Plus, they’re willing to do consolidations up to two advances.

In addition, 6th Avenue Capital is open to offering financing to brokers. “It’s really good in that there is an alignment of interests and allows brokers to participate in the deals they put forth. If they think the merchant is credit worthy and a terrific opportunity, they participate. Everyone has skin in the game and interests are aligned,” Chang said.

Technology

While technology is at the core of fintech, all three of the companies take a hybrid approach when it comes to credit underwriting comprised of a tech platform and the human touch, which perhaps keeps character-based lending alive in some form.

With respect to fintech, “6th Avenue Capital’s philosophy is that technology is a tool to supplement human underwriting. We use technology to detect fraud, manage workload processes and manage risk. We do not use technology to make our final decisions,” said Chang.

Specifically, 6th Avenue Capital benefits from research, artificial intelligence and predictive technology of its sister company Nexlend Capital. 6th Avenue Capital has customized Nexlend’s consumer lending algorithmic intellectual property, which uses machine learning and credit analysis with high speed execution to make better and faster decisions.

Elevate also takes a dual-approach to its underwriting process. “I believe in a hybrid method. You have to have someone looking at it, to have eyes on the paper at some point in the process. This doesn’t mean a computer system can’t help to weed out what might not meet the criteria, but I do believe there needs to be a person reviewing the files,” Francis said.

National Funding was started as an equipment leasing company. “We apply some principles we learned as a leasing company and take into account all of the attributes that go into that business in addition to FICO and cash flow,” Inouye said.

Automation is an area of technology that they continue to look to for innovation and process efficiencies. “We do serve our customers online, but we also provide a human contact as well. We deliver a loan experience that builds trust and confidence with customers. We try to deliver on what our customers want in the most efficient way,” said National Funding’s Inouye.

National Funding continues to look at construction deals and accepts them as a niche in their portfolio, which Inouye said differentiates the company. “It allows us to be more flexible and comfortable with certain industries that other lenders might stay away from.”

Corporate Culture

2017 has been a roller coaster year for fintech including alt funders. While there have been plenty of bright spots, there was also some fallout that left veteran players scrambling to salvage either their reputation, status as a funder or both.

SoFi has been at the center of controversies that resulted in the Mike Cagney leaving his chairman post with plans to step down as CEO. Most recently, the lender has removed its application for a bank charter, according to reports.

We asked Elevate’s Francis about it. “SoFi is a very big company. They’re to the level where the CEO has people to answer to. They have a checks and balances system they need to go through,” said Francis. “It worked, and they removed him.”

“MY DOOR IS ALWAYS OPEN. THAT’S OUR OFFICE POLICY”


Francis maintains an open-door policy with her employees, and she says all you can do is focus on your house and keep your house in order. “My door is always open. That’s our office policy. They use that quite frequently; it’s a catch 22,” she said with a laugh.

Fintech and Diversity

Something else that all three executives have in common is that they are all women in top roles in fintech, an industry that isn’t known for its diversity.

6th Avenue’s Chang’s career includes working at a large institutional bank for six years. Out of 200 professionals, only four of them in her group were women. “At the end of the day, performance is the best differentiator. If you perform well, it presents unique opportunities. At 6th Avenue Capital, diversity is embraced. Our underlying merchants aren’t just one gender or color. Diversity helps us understand the needs of small businesses better, so we can provide fast and customized funding quickly,” she said.

Goodbye Liens and Judgments

October 28, 2017
Article by:

This story appeared in deBanked’s Sept/Oct 2017 magazine issue. To receive copies in print, SUBSCRIBE FREE

Credit Bureaus have stopped reporting this data, so now what?

SHREDDEDJustice can require sacrifice. Take the example of a decision by the three major credit bureaus – Equifax, Experian and TransUnion – to stop including some liens and most judgments in their credit reports.

The change makes life a little less unfair for consumers who fell victim to reporting errors. Many invested precious time and large amounts of money trying unsuccessfully to correct their credit histories and restore their reputations.

But for the alternative small-business finance industry, omitting data on liens and judgments increases costs, creates extra work and can even give rise to an unsettled feeling in the pit of the stomach. “You’re not looking at a full credit report anymore, which is kind of scary,” one alt funder admits.

Yellowstone Capital CEO Isaac Stern provides an example to illustrate what’s at issue. “Imagine I’m the Ford Motor Co. and I want to do a lease with you,” he says. “But I don’t have the information that you happen to have judgments from Chrysler, Chevy and BMW, so I approve your lease. Imagine that! Without full information, how do you make accurate decisions?”

Operating without the data could prove dangerous, agrees David Goldin, who sold his U.S. Capify operations to Strategic Funding Source in January but still runs Capify UK and Capify Australia and remains open to U.S. opportunities. “The IRS could come in and seize credit card processing accounts and prevent the lender from getting paid,” he says. “Once you have a judgment a creditor could come in and freeze bank accounts.”

“WE FOUND OUT JULY 31 WHEN A REUTERS REP EMAILED US AND SAID THIS IS GOING INTO EFFECT TOMORROW”


Fears aside, the change in reporting probably won’t dry up alternative small-business credit – even in the short run, Goldin predicts. Alt funders will adjust quickly, he says, noting that they can compare the old and new credit scores of long-time customers to spot patterns and apply those patterns to their calculations. The industry can also tap alternative sources of information.

Even with those reassurances, the transition would have been easier if the industry had more advance notice, alt funders say. “We found out July 31 when a Reuters rep emailed us and said this is going into effect tomorrow,” recalls Stern. “That was really weird – I’ve got to tell you.” Experian didn’t provide a heads-up even though Yellowstone is one of its largest New Jersey customers, he notes. “We were a little bit annoyed, but what are going to do?” Meanwhile, Goldin says he didn’t begin researching the situation until deBanked asked him about it. “I don’t think anyone really knew about it” much in advance, he says.

But the industry is finding out and taking action. Yellowstone, for example, is performing a performing a workaround by integrating the judgments and liens section of the Clear investigative platform into the information underwriters see when they open a file, Stern says. The integration required a couple of weeks of hard work by the Yellowstone tech team, he notes.

Thomson ReutersClear, which is provided by Thomson Reuters, amasses public records that can date back 20 years and can fill more than a hundred pages, he says, adding that you have to know where to look for the relevant information. “You have to dig through it,” he says.

In the past, Yellowstone performed a Clear report on most files just before funding them, Stern explains. Now, the Clear report is scrutinized more extensively and earlier in the process – before the file is approved. As a result, Yellowstone underwriters will have all the information they need, but it will take them a little longer to get it, he says.

Yellowstone incurred the expense of obtaining additional user licenses from Clear, which cost it $800 to $900 monthly Stern says. Experian now charges the same price for less information, he notes.

Accommodating the changes didn’t require more underwriters but it became necessary to hire four additional data entry clerks to input information until the integration with Clear was completed, Stern says. Now that Clear and the Yellowstone systems are working together, the four extra clerical workers will shift their attention to inputting data from the increasing number of applications coming into the company, he says.

“IT’S MORE OF A NUISANCE ISSUE THAN A MANPOWER ISSUE”


Most Alt funders won’t need to employ more people in their underwriting departments because changes to their models will be automated, Goldin says. “I don’t think this is as much of a game changer as people think it is,” he says of the credit bureaus’ new approach to reporting.” It’s just one extra step. It’s more of a nuisance issue than a manpower issue.”

However, a challenge arises for underwriters because leaving out the liens and judgments will result in higher credit scores for some loan or advance applicants, Goldin says. That means some alt lenders may need to go to the trouble and expense of tweaking their risk models to compensate for the change in the scores reported by the credit bureaus, he maintains.

The impact may be greatest among alt funders who rely on quick online decision-making, Goldin says. Adding extra steps to the process increases the difficulty of maintaining the speed that provides a selling point and a source of pride for those companies.

yellowstone capital officeWhile Clear is helping to fill the gap at Yellowstone, it’s not the only company providing much-needed data. LexisNexis Risk Solutions isn’t a credit bureau and will thus continue to disseminate information it gathers from courtrooms on lien and judgments, Goldin notes. Alt lenders who weren’t already using the vendor’s service or were using it only when an application reached a predetermined threshold will face added expense because of the credit bureaus’ decision, he says.

Indeed, LexisNexis Risk Solutions views the credit bureaus’ hiatus on some liens and judgments reporting as a business opportunity to increase its sales by supplying the missing data, according to Ankush Tewari, senior director of marketing planning in the company’s business services section. The company was already selling data on liens and judgments and anticipates selling much more of it, he observes.

LexisNexisFor 15 years LexisNexis Risk Solutions has been selling RiskView Solutions, a product that contains liens, judgments and other information not generally found on credit reports, such as the assessed value of a consumer’s home or a list of a consumer’s professional licenses. It offers no data on loan repayment but its other information helps define a consumer’s creditworthiness and character, Tewari says. Lenders can combine that peripheral information with credit scores for a more complete customer profile that outperforms the credit score alone, he suggests.

And there’s more. LexisNexis Risk Solutions has reacted to the credit bureaus’ decision by creating RiskView Liens & Judgments Report, which lists only those two types of records. “The credit bureaus announced these changes a year ago, and we knew there would continue to have a need for that data,” Tewari says. The company prices the RiskView information based upon the transaction volume, he notes, so a lender pays less per transaction as volume increases.

With this emphasis on liens and judgments, one might well wonder who tracks down the information. Companies like LexisNexis Risk Solutions gather and disseminate public records on liens and judgments from courthouses throughout the United States, says Tewari. Over the years the company acquired some of its competitors and eventually was spun off from its sister company, LexisNexis, which built its name partly as an aid for lawyers researching cases, he notes.

For decades, LexisNexis Risk Solutions has been providing the credit bureaus with raw data not only on liens and judgments but also on bankruptcies, Tewari says. The bureaus have then parsed those files electronically and appended the data to credit reports, he continues.

Problems arose because the credit bureaus’ tech systems could not always link the court documents to the right person when the courts provided only a name and address, Tewari maintains. Courts often limit information in their records to those two identifiers because they’re reluctant to divulge additional identification that criminals could intercept and use to commit fraud, he says.

Tewari traces the bureaus’ inaccuracies in matching court records to the right people to what he calls the bureaus’ “DNA.” The bureaus are accustomed to receiving “clean” information from lenders on a regularly scheduled basis. Conversely, some of the LexisNexis Risk Solutions data, gathered from obscure places like county deed offices, may arrive in a form that’s far from clean, he notes.

Corner of Maple Street and Main StreetHowever, that lack of court information or inconsistencies in the presentation of that information doesn’t pose problems for LexisNexis Risk Solutions because the company cleans the data before analyzing it. Tests indicate its linking methodology works accurately with just a name and address more than 99.9 percent of the time, Tewari contends. Thus, the company can establish that John Smith at 1234 Maple Street is the same person as John A. Smith at 1234 Maple Street, he says. He considers that linking technology the core of the company’s operations.

The information LexisNexis Risk Solutions can supply becomes vital to lenders because studies indicate that people who have a lien or judgment on file are twice as likely as people without them to default on a consumer loan and five times as likely to default on a mortgage, Tewari says. “The data didn’t become less important because the credit bureaus decided not to include it anymore,” he maintains. “It’s still just as predictive as it was.”

Meanwhile, other types of information can also help lenders make decisions, notes Eric Lindeen, vice president of marketing for ID Analytics, a credit risk and fraud risk management company that offers a credit score called Credit Optics, which it bases on a combination of traditional and alternative credit data.

Alternative credit data is defined as anything the credit bureaus don’t include in their reports, Lindeen says. Examples include the bills consumers pay for cell phones, utilities and cable television, he notes, adding that rent is also sometimes considered alternative credit data. The category also encompasses records from marketplace lenders.

A consumer’s tendency to pay those bills on time, late or not at all can reflect on creditworthiness, Lindeen maintains. That history becomes relevant for alt funders because the small businesses they serve constitute a hybrid of consumer and commercial credit, he says.

Using that data, ID Analytics can spot people who are good credit risks when the credit bureaus still consign them to “thin file” status — the limbo where applicants don’t have enough credit history to evaluate their creditworthiness, Lindeen maintains. About 60 percent of near-prime applicants qualify for credit when lenders factor in alternative data, according to an ID Analytics study he says. At the same time, alternative data can also expose weaknesses among individuals with excellent traditional credit scores, he observes.

“EVEN THOUGH IT’S A SMALL POPULATION, IT’S A CRITICAL POPULATION”


Combining alternative data with traditional data has become more important with the bureaus’ decision to stop supplying data on liens and judgments, Lindeen says. Leaving out that data will raise some credit scores, and the effect will be strongest among near-prime individuals with good but not great traditional scores, he notes. With those consumers, a 10-point shift could make a big difference in qualifying for credit, he says.

“Even though it’s a small population, it’s a critical population,” Lindeen says of those newly minted prime applicants. They may number only one in a hundred of a particular funder’s portfolio, but they may advance to another risk pool and consequently invalidate a risk model, he suggests. Over time, risk managers will adapt to the change and oversee a “risk migration,” he predicts.

rising credit scoreOverall, between 6 percent and 9 percent of consumers will see their credit scores rise because of the bureaus’ new policy, Lindeen estimates. The change usually won’t exceed 20 points, he says. Still, about 700,000 will see an improvement of 40 points or more, he continues. “That’s a significant increase for a nontrivial population,” he says. “It’s likely their performance will stay the same as their score goes up.”

A study by VantageScore Solutions, the company that provides the VantageScore credit scoring model to the credit reporting bureaus, projected scores would increase an average of 10 points for slightly more than 8 percent of the scorable U.S. population.

Those changes are characterized as “minimal” by Francis Creighton, President & CEO of the Consumer Data Industry Association, a trade group that represents the three major credit bureaus as well as about a hundred other companies – mostly smaller credit bureaus around the country, resellers of credit bureau information and background screening companies.

The credit bureaus decided to curtail reporting of judgments and liens as part of the National Consumer Assistance Plan, or NCAP, Creighton says. NCAP is an agreement reached in March 2015 among the three major credit bureaus and the attorneys general of 31 states, who were pressing for fairness in credit reports. Many observers call NCAP a “settlement” but the agreement did not result from a lawsuit, he notes.

Under NCAP, the bureaus will continue to include bankruptcies in their reports because the records meet the standard of providing a name, address, Social Security number and date of birth and because visits to the courthouse to update records occur at least every 90 days. About half of liens don’t meet those standards and will be removed from credit reports, and nearly all judgments fail to adhere to the standard and will no longer appear on the reports.

“I DON’T KNOW HOW WIDESPREAD IT WAS, BUT IT WAS DISRUPTIVE ENOUGH FOR INDIVIDUAL PEOPLE THAT IT’S BETTER JUST NOT TO HAVE IT”


Although Creighton declines to say how many consumers were victims of credit reporting errors, he emphasizes the severity of the problem for each victim. “If you were one of the people who had a name similar to somebody else or a similar Social Security number, it would impact you a lot,” he maintains. “I don’t know how widespread it was, but it was disruptive enough for individual people that it’s better just not to have it.”

A Federal Trade Commission study released in 2013 reported that a sample of 1,000 credit reports indicated that 25 percent had at least one error that could reduce scores, according to published reports. Such findings prompted state attorneys general to seek remedies that resulted in NCAP.

The bureaus planned to implement another major portion of NCAP in September when they were to begin waiting 180 days before reporting medical debts, Creighton notes. At the same time, debts for medical expenses covered by insurance policies were to be omitted from credit reports, he says.

Changes brought by NCAP represent part of ongoing efforts to improve the system, according to Creighton. “We want accurate information in the reports,” he says. “That’s good for everybody.”

Watch the House Subcommittee Hearing on Fintech and Online Small Business Lending

October 26, 2017
Article by:

deBanked streamed the small business subcommitte hearing that took place at 10AM EST in Room 2360 of the Rayburn House Office Building on October 26th. If it’s not loading below, you can watch it at: House Small Committee website.

Kate Fisher, a partner at law firm Hudson Cook, testified on behalf of the Commercial Finance Coalition. As described in her prepared written testimony, “CFC member companies offer fair and innovative alternatives to bank term loans and have stepped in to provide capital to small businesses when larger, traditional banks stopped providing such financing. CFC member companies primarily offer Merchant Cash Advance (‘MCA’) factoring products. An MCA allows small businesses to access funds for, as an example, a seasonal inventory surge or to replace an unexpected major equipment failure. CFC members provide financing between $10,000 and $500,000 to qualified small businesses.”

Her written testimony can be accessed HERE.

The CFC’s Spring Fly-in was covered back in June when the group met with 26 members of Congress and senior staff. The group was reportedly back in Washington again this week to educate members of the House Small Business Committee about MCAs and alternative finance. We will provide more information as it becomes available.

The Top Small Business Funders By Revenue

October 23, 2017
Article by:

This story appeared in deBanked’s Sept/Oct 2017 magazine issue. To receive copies in print, SUBSCRIBE FREE

The below chart ranks several companies in the non-bank small business financing space by revenue over the last 5 years. The data is primarily drawn from reports submitted to the Inc. 5000 list, public earnings statements, or published media reports. It is not comprehensive. Companies for which no data is publicly available are excluded.

Small Business Funders Ranked By Revenue

Company 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Square1 $1,708,721,000 $1,267,118,000 $850,192,000 $552,433,000 $203,449,000
OnDeck2 $291,300,000 $254,700,000 $158,100,000 $65,200,000 $25,600,000
Kabbage3 $171,784,000 $97,461,712 $40,193,000
Swift Capital4 $88,600,000 $51,400,000 $27,540,900 $11,703,500
National Funding $75,693,096 $59,075,878 $39,048,959 $26,707,000 $18,643,813
Reliant Funding5 $51,946,472 $11,294,044 $9,723,924 $5,968,009 $2,096,324
Fora Financial6 $41,590,720 $33,974,000 $26,932,581 $18,418,300
Forward Financing $28,305,078
Gibraltar Business Capital $15,984,688
Tax Guard $9,886,365 $8,197,755 $5,142,739 $4,354,787
United Capital Source $8,465,260 $3,917,193
Blue Bridge Financial $6,569,714 $5,470,564
Lighter Capital $6,364,417 $4,364,907
Fast Capital 360 $6,264,924
US Business Funding $5,794,936
Cashbloom $5,404,123 $4,804,112 $3,941,819 $3,823,893 $2,555,140
Fund&Grow $4,082,130
Nav $2,663,344
Priority Funding Solutions $2,599,931
StreetShares $647,119 $239,593
CAN Capital7 $213,402,616 $269,852,762 $215,503,978 $151,606,959
Bizfi8 $79,886,000 $51,475,000 $38,715,312
Quick Bridge Funding $48,856,909 $44,603,626
Funding Circle Holdings9 $39,411,279 $20,100,000 $8,100,000
Capify10 $37,860,596 $41,119,291
Credibly11 $26,265,198 $14,603,213 $7,013,359
Envision Capital Group $21,034,113 $19,432,205 $12,071,976 $11,173,853
Capital Advance Solutions $4,856,377
Channel Partners Capital $2,207,927 $4,013,608 $3,673,990 $2,208,488
Bankers Healthcare Group $93,825,129 $61,332,289
Strada Capital $8,765,600
Direct Capital $432,780,164 $329,350,716
Snap Advances $21,946,000
American Finance Solutions12 $5,871,832 $6,359,078
The Business Backer13 $19,593,171 $11,205,755 $9,615,062

1Square (SQ) went public in 2015
2OnDeck (ONDK) went public in 2014
3Kabbage received a $1.25B+ private market valuation in August 2017
4Swift Capital was acquired by PayPal (PYPL) in August 2017
5Reliant Funding was acquired by a PE firm in 2014
6Fora Financial was acquired by a PE firm in 2015
7CAN Capital ceased funding operations in December 2016 but resumed in July 2017
8Bizfi wound down in 2017. Credibly secured the servicing rights of their portfolio
9Funding Circle’s primary market is the UK
10Capify’s US operations were wound down in early 2017 and their operations were integrated with Strategic Funding Source. Capify’s international companies are still operating
11Credibly received a significant equity investment from a PE firm in 2015
12American Finance Solutions was acquired by Rapid Capital Funding in 2014, who was then immediately acquired by North American Bancard
13The Business Backer was acquired by Enova (ENVA) in 2015

The Voice of Main Street – Small Businesses Share Their Experience With Non-bank Finance

October 18, 2017
Article by:

This story appeared in deBanked’s Sept/Oct 2017 magazine issue. To receive copies in print, SUBSCRIBE FREE

business owners

If she hadn’t scored the $250,000 loan through Breakout Capital in 2015, Jackie Luo says, the commercial-software firm she heads in Baltimore could not have made the “strategic hires” and purchased the new server to support additional customers and maintain the company’s 30% growth rate.

“Without that infusion of capital” from the McLean (Va.)-based lender, says Luo, chief executive at E-ISG Asset Intelligence, the software solutions provider would have been hard-pressed to deploy the “bandwidth and capacity” necessary to meet burgeoning demand.

And demand there is. Luo says billing for her company’s services helping more than 100 businesses and government agencies improve operational efficiency by keeping tabs on multiple assets — human, financial and equipment — topped $1.5 million last year, up from $1 million in 2015. This year, moreover, E-ISG is on track to collect nearly $2 million.

“WE ARE A SMALL BUSINESS AND WE’D BE JUST ONE IN A MILLION AT A BIG BANK LIKE WELLS FARGO. THEY WOULDN’T GIVE US MUCH ATTENTION”


Meantime, she says, the $250,000, 10-year note at 6% interest she obtained with the help of Breakout was both a good deal and convenient: she reports securing the financing in three weeks, compared with the six months that a commercial bank would likely have taken. In addition, she’s been able to forge a better relationship with Breakout than with a faceless financial institution.

“We are a small business,” she says, “and we’d be just one in a million at a big bank like Wells Fargo. They wouldn’t give us much attention.” With Breakout, Luo adds: “I have the freedom to make decisions about infrastructure investments without worrying about the short-term. And I don’t have to deal with people second-guessing me.”

Had she not gotten the financing, moreover, “I would not be able to pay myself,” she says. “I’d have to use my salary as working capital.”

Luo is not alone. Her company’s story of finding much-needed capital from a nonbank financial company is increasingly common. It has always been challenging for small businesses to obtain credit from a big bank — roughly a financial institution larger than $10 billion in assets. But the small and community banks that have been the lifeblood for small businesses have also been winding down their small-business lending as well, according to a March, 2016, working paper published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

“As recently as 1997, small banks, with less than $10 billion in assets, accounted for 77% of the small business lending market share issued by commercial banks,” co-authors Julapa Jagtiani and Catharine Lemieux write in “Small Business Lending: Challenges and Opportunities for Community Banks.” However, the market share dropped to 43% in 2015 for small business loans with origination amounts less than $1 million held by depository institutions.

“The decline is even more severe for small business loans of less than $100,000,” they add, “where the market share for small banks under $10 billion declined from 82% in 1997 to only 29% in 2015.”

Philadelphia FedThe Philadelphia Fed study notes that alternative nonbank lenders are filling a widening gap. “By using technology and unconventional underwriting techniques, many alternative lenders are competing for borrowers with offers of faster processing times, automatic applications, minimal demands for financial documents, and funding as soon as the same day.” And the Fed study finds that it’s likely that nonbank lenders, which are growing rapidly, are having a positive effect by “increasing the availability of credit, particularly to newer businesses that do not have the credit history required by traditional lenders.”

Meantime, the Small Business Administration reports that small businesses remain essential to the health of the U.S. economy. Businesses with fewer than 500 employees account for 55% of overall employment in the U.S., according to the agency, and are responsible for creating two out of every three net new jobs. Which means that alternative funding sources — which do not, it is worth noting, depend on depositors’ money, as banks do — are playing an increasingly important and largely unrecognized role in the country’s economic fortunes, notes Cornelius Hurley, a law professor at Boston University and executive director of the Online Lending Policy Institute. “They’re still a small percentage of the overall lending picture,” he says of nonbank financial companies, “but they’re an emerging force and a lot of small businesspeople certainly depend on them. If they disappeared tomorrow,” he adds, “a lot of businesses would be wiped out too.”

“IF [NONBANK FINANCIAL COMPANIES] DISAPPEARED TOMORROW, A LOT OF BUSINESSES WOULD BE WIPED OUT TOO”


To find out what is happening in the real world, deBanked interviewed small business owners around the country: among others, a Houston sports medicine provider, a Connecticut restaurateur, a Midwestern truck hauler, and a Maryland hardware-store owner. Some recounted being shunned by banks because of poor credit while others registered unhappiness with traditional financial institutions as inconvenient and impersonal. While some who turned to alternative lenders admitted they would have preferred not to be paying dearly for borrowing or for cash advances, most said the tradeoff was worth it.

The existence of alternative lenders has made it possible for these businesspeople to meet payrolls, pay contractors and suppliers even when business was slow or billings stalled. Customers with alternative funders – in addition to Breakout’s customers, deBanked spoke to clients of Pearl Capital Business Funding and Merchants Advance Network– also reported that they were able to purchase or replace equipment and maintain inventory, hire additional employees and accept new customers, pay for upkeep and upgrades of their business’s physical plant, and make other expenditures necessary to keep operations up-and-running.

Jason, for example, who heads a family business in Louisiana manufacturing and selling pesticides (and who asked to be identified only by his first name), reports that his suppliers began demanding that he pay in advance for chemical feedstock after he took a “financial hit following a nasty divorce.”

The roughly $1 million (annual sales) business — which was started by his parents back in 1960 — furnishes chemicals mainly to cotton farmers and homeowners in Louisiana and Texas, most of whom purchase the company’s products through feed and hardware stores. Jason says he spends a substantial amount of time on the road handling sales and distribution.

cotton fieldHis suppliers not only require him to pay for the chemicals upfront but, following his divorce, they now insist upon larger purchases as well. Following the departure of a previous lender, he says, Breakout stepped in with an $80,000, 12-month loan in March, 2016, which he was able to repay within six months. This was followed by a $60,000 borrowing in March, 2017, which he again paid down early – in 90 days, Jason says – and the account manager at Breakout “went to bat for me and gave me an additional discount for early payment.”

Had Breakout not provided external funding, Jason says, he would have been “wiped out.” He adds with feeling: “It would have meant the end of me.” And sinking the fortunes of the company would also have spelled job losses for five employees, including both his son, who works part-time, and his sister, the business’s co-manager. “Now I’m out of the hole,” he says.

In Houston, Anna, co-owner of a physical therapy and sports medicine concern, was interviewed in August just before Hurricane Harvey loomed on the horizon. “We’d been around for four years and growing rapidly,” she says, asking to be identified only by her first name, and “we couldn’t keep up with the growth.”

Anna recalls that a few years ago (she is vague about the exact dates) the company needed $50,000 to $60,000 to add equipment and staff to meet the growing demand. Because of some “ups and downs” in her business and credit history, however, a bank loan was out of the question. “My credit wasn’t the best,” Anna says, “and we had not been in business the five-to-seven years that most banks want.” She began casting about for financing and quickly saw that factoring would not be a suitable choice for a business like hers, which depends heavily on third-party payments from health insurance providers. “Companies using factoring are taking money based on credit card payments,” she says, “and we’re not a restaurant or a bar. So we can’t pay a percentage of every transaction.” Typically, she notes, getting paid by an insurance company involves a “90-day turnaround.”

due diligenceAnna went online, did some research, and talked to three or four nonbank lenders searching for the “right kind of company.” That led her to Breakout. “What I really liked about them is that they did a lot of due diligence on our field,” she says. “They did their homework, asking us: ‘What are your collections and payroll? How much outstanding debt do you have?’ They also asked to see our actual bank statements.”

Despite the high level of due diligence that Breakout performed, Anna says, it only took “maybe three or four days” for the loan to be approved and for the money to land in her bank account. Before long, she was off to the races. With the added capital, she hired three more employees – bringing the employee headcount to 18 — purchased more gym equipment, made payroll, and paid off miscellaneous expenses.

The added capacity and fortified staff, meanwhile, enabled the company to “almost triple its volume,” the entrepreneur says. And not only did the financing “put me in a good financial place,” Anna adds, but after repayment, Breakout made it possible for her to effect a merger with a competitor by approving a second loan for about $30,000. “The best thing about Breakout,” she says, “has been the communication. One time I did need to make a payment two or three days late. But I just called (the account manager). I was very surprised because these kinds of companies are seen as a last resort. But it was like they were investing in us.”

poolesville hardware

John Speelman, who owns Poolesville Hardware in Poolesville, Md., can boast a raft of five-star Yelp reviews online. “Extremely helpful and friendly service, surprisingly good selection (and) the complete opposite of a big box hardware chain,” raves one customer. “It is so rare to find a well-stocked store that has helpful personnel—makes this store a real gem!” says another fan.

For his part, Speelman attributes much of his hardware store’s popularity to the financing arrangement that he’s been able to work out over the past eight years with Merchants Advance Network, a Fort Lauderdale (Fla.)-based alternative funder. “It takes money to make money,” is one of his pet aphorisms.

Located roughly 35 miles west of the White House, the hardware store boasts a clientele who tend to arrive in BMW’s rather than the pickup trucks that predominated a decade or so ago in this exurban community of some 5,000 denizens. Whatever their class background, though, they’re looking for items that are not a good match for an online purchase. “People don’t buy a toilet plunger, a can of paint or picture-hanging stuff online,” Speelman says. “Because they want to do that today,” he says, “they won’t order with Amazon.”

“One industry that has not been impacted” by online merchandisers, he adds, “is the garden center. They’ll buy a garden hose, weed killer and seeding,” he explains of his regular customers. “And light bulbs” while they’re there, he adds. “We’re like the 7-Eleven — a convenience store.”

To guarantee that convenience, Speelman pays cash-in-advance for most of his inventory, and banks have not been helpful. He contrasts the relationship he has with Michael Scalise, the chief executive at Merchants Advance, with loan officers at commercial banks. “It’s hard to get a loan for anything in retail,” he says. Never mind that he maintains “a high credit rating and I never bounce a check,” he went on. “There are no more local banks. At M&T Bank, all the managers I knew are gone and there’s always a new teller. The banking industry is a revolving door.” So he opts for capital from Merchants Advance “when I need 30-40-50 grand in a day, I use Mike’s money” even though the cost can be as steep as 25%, he says. If he doesn’t have something in stock – specialty items like ammo boxes, a Sugarplum tent, as many as 32 packs of size D batteries, metric measuring tapes – he can put in a special order with suppliers. But he prides himself on the full panoply of wares on his shelves. “You can’t sell from an empty cart,” is another of his favorite sayings.

“THERE ARE NO MORE LOCAL BANKS”


Lori Hitchcock, who also draws capital from Merchants Advance, is manifestly displeased with the banking industry. She’s an owner with her husband of Hitchcock Trucking, the couple’s 60-year-old family business, which is located on a ten-acre tract in Webberville, Mich., situated between Detroit and Lansing, the state capital.

Of her experience with banks, Hitchcock says: “At the time we went with (Merchants Advance), banks weren’t lending. And they’re still not lending. We’re considered high-maintenance and high-risk. Banks don’t want a bunch of trucks” should they foreclose on a loan, she observes. “If you’re a farmer, they can take all your land. Great! In this crazy world you live in, it’s hard to get the banks interested.”

peterbiltThe Hitchcock family’s fleet of ten Peterbilt semis hitch up to more than 20 trailers and truck bodies – flatbeds, dump trucks, vans, and refrigerated trucks or “reefers” – and haul grain, sweet corn, onions, celery, fertilizer, and soft drinks across the Midwest. Most recently, she says, the family business took out $80,000 from Merchants Advance to expand its fleet and buy another reefer trailer and a backhoe. “Out here in the country, you always need a backhoe,” she says.

To satisfy her lender, the company makes daily ACH payments. “I’m not going to lie and say that things aren’t tight,” she says. “It is a burden. You just have to have constant cash-flow – which we do have. And it’s important to have good relationships…I can usually tell three weeks in advance if (making payments) is going to be challenging. So it all comes down to being loyal to people.”

Whatever the struggle to keep up with debt payments, it beats using her own money. “My husband and I are raising a family,” Hitchcock says, “and it’s nice having the cash so you’re not putting your personal earnings into the company.”

In Manchester, Conn., a stone’s throw east of Hartford, Corey Wry says that he wouldn’t be able to operate his two, highly rated restaurants just off Interstate 84 – Corey’s Catsup & Mustard and Pastrami on Wry – if he didn’t have funding from Pearl Capital, a New York (N.Y.)-based alternative funding company. A graduate of Johnson & Wales University in Providence, a restaurant-and hotel school, Wry describes himself as “a culinary guy” whose first love is serving food that’s both innovatively prepared and delicious. He candidly admits that his credit hit “rock bottom” after a confluence of untoward events.

catsup and mustard

Last year, a third restaurant in town, Chops & Catch, that he and some partners had “bootstrapped” had to shut down after six years of operation. Despite generally favorable reviews for such creative fare as the “lobsterburger,” the surf-and-turf themed restaurant was a money-loser. He was also struggling to pay off credit cards. And he’d been late more than once on car payments.

At the same time, Wry was in the process of moving Pastrami & Wry — a deli whose moniker is wordplay on his last name – to a new location. Both the general contractor and electrician were “over-budget” on that project, he says. Meanwhile, Catsup and Mustard, a hamburger spot, needed to be spruced up. Says he: “It was getting busier and the original seats were worn. I had a hole in a booth big enough to swallow someone.”

“THEN I GOT A COLD CALL FROM ONE OF THESE FINANCIERS”


He approached a few banks for a loan and “it did not seem like it was going to happen,” he says. “Then I got a cold call from one of these financiers. Some of them had super-high rates. When you have bad credit but need to make capital improvements you do what you have to do.”

He’s accessed more than $100,000 from several alternative funding sources, including Pearl – from which he reports getting merchant cash advances for $30,000. But hard as it is to meet the obligations, which typically require a daily ACH payment, the financing has made renovating the burger place possible. Moreover, he’d still be on the hook with plumbers and other contractors – all of whom are local tradesmen and would likely be paying him personal visits until they were repaid — for the relocation of Pastrami & Wry.

“Business is good,” says Wry, who at 40 is single, often works 15-hour days, and says that he doesn’t have time for a girlfriend, much less a wife and family. “I’ve still got $3,200 on the books with the electrician,” he adds, “which means that I won’t be able to purchase a deli slicer. I have to plan these things out…”

MCGEHEE

James McGehee, a partner at the boutique accounting and tax-preparation firm McGehee, Davis & Associates, which is located in the Denver suburb of White Ridge, reports that the firm took a merchant cash advance from Pearl Capital, among other financiers, to bridge the gap between tax season and the rest of the year when billings invariably diminish. “Our overhead is pretty high,” he explains. “We’ve added two employees. We’ve been expanding on what we were doing, adding tax and accounting clients.”

A very conservative, sober-sounding man, McGehee explained that his credit was nonetheless “trashed” after he suffered from health problems five years ago. “Major stuff,” he says, “it was open-heart surgery.” The medical ordeal meant that he could not work for a time and had trouble paying his bills. “Some family members helped me through the mortgage and utilities payments and I ended up in arrears and in credit card debt,” he says.

All of which made an alternative source of financing his firm’s only option. “I’m not sure how we heard about Pearl,” he says. “I think they just happened to call. We took out [$11,000]. It was not a huge amount. We also borrowed $9,000 from another entity. We paid it all back during tax season. The terms were pretty steep,” McGehee adds.

“But when you need the money for cash-flow,” he explains, “you just absorb it. You grin and bear it. When you need the money, you need the money.”

The Sept/Oct 2017 Issue of deBanked Magazine Has Shipped

October 12, 2017
Article by:

The latest issue of deBanked Magazine has shipped. In this issue we explore a new rule implemented by credit bureaus surrounding the reporting of liens and judgments, the shifting landscape for lead generators, and once again, what merchants themselves are saying about their experiences with online loans and merchant cash advances. There’s a lot more of course!!!

If you’re already subscribed, you should receive a copy soon. If you haven’t subscribed, you can make sure to get all future issues FREE by SIGNING UP HERE

deBanked Magazine September/October 2017

Bizfi Alum Jared Weitz Reflects on Demise of Former Employer and Rise of UCS

October 9, 2017
Article by:

Jared Weitz United Capital SourceJared Weitz has come a long way since his earlier days as one of the original Bizfi employees. Today he’s at the helm of online funding marketplace United Capital Source (UCS), which has been on a tear since deBanked last spoke with Weitz a couple of years ago. The UCS founder and chief executive took some time to revisit with us about having to painfully watch the demise of his former employer, which is where he cut his teeth in this business, and the rise of his own company UCS as a funding marketplace.

In some ways, the more things change the more they stay the same. Since the last time Weitz spoke with us, the company’s location remains in the heart of Times Square in New York, and UCS has grown its staff by only four people including two sales reps. What has changed, however, is the amount of funding that the company has done and the size of the average transaction, all of which have blossomed.

“When we first spoke a few years ago we were doing $8 million to $10 million a month in funding volume. Now we are doing between $14 million and $16 million per month,” said Weitz.

He added that where the company differentiates itself is that while a few years ago the products they were selling were predominately in the sub-prime space now they sell other products, which allows merchants to “swim upstream” when they qualify for that.

The result has been bolstered partnerships and product offerings and an average loan size that has jumped from $30,000 to $40,000 per deal to a range of $500,000 to $2 million.

“We opened up the funnel to the kind of relationships we’re able to broker and the kinds of financings we’re able to offer. We’re playing in the field of SBAs, account receivables financing, lines of credit and asset backed loans. By offering these products our volume has jumped significantly and allowed us to talk to different referral partners.”

UCS does all of its own marketing and generates leads for their in-house sales reps. Those sales reps take a file from open to close and they analyze the small business owner’s needs on a consultative call.

“We understand their business and their pain points. The first question we ask isn’t how much do you need but what’s paining you in your business today that we can help you with?”

One such business owner recounted his experience with UCS to deBanked, saying that traditional banks were “an absolute pain” to secure funding. He spoke of the “very stressful” and time-consuming process of applying for a loan, saying he doesn’t have time to “jump through a million hoops to get a loan.”

Jared Weitz deBanked Magazine Cover United Capital Source

“When I was initially looking to curb my temporary cash flow problem, I searched online for the best alternatives to traditional bank loans. I read all the reviews on companies and decided to call UCS,” the business owner told deBanked, adding that he’s been a UCS repeat customer for a number of years and is especially fond of the ease at which the process is completed.

“I could literally call Jared today and have six figures in my account tomorrow. The best part is the pay back process. They only take funds when I run credit card transactions. So, in my slow months, I don’t have to stress and worry about repaying the loan. UCS is a perfect fit for me,” the business owner said.

Eye Opener

As the seventh or eighth employee of Bizfi, Weitz really has been part of the evolution of online funding. He says the rise and fall of Bizfi has been an “eye opener” for him.

“It caused a bunch of funding companies to be a little gun shy when it comes to funding. I told my guys this too shall pass. People are shaken and wondering if it’s a larger global issue. Thankfully it’s not a global issue. There are plenty of funding companies that are well backed that are still funding. My group is well able to pick it back up. We have signed up with more funding companies to increase our offerings and make sure we have no concentration issues,” said Weitz.

And although he left the company to eventually launch UCS, which has proven to be a prudent move, he has nothing but respect for his former employer.

“My history there is very deep and I’ve got a genuine love for the founders of the company. It’s where I cut my teeth. I was really sad the day I heard they’re not funding anymore.”

In fact, Bizfi was one of the funders that UCS counted among its partners.

“We had a good book there. We started to see problems and began to shift where our new business was going. Thankfully it didn’t affect me. But it showed me that you should sign up with more funding companies. If you think the mix should be X go 50% more and be super cautious. This approach has worked out for us,” he said.

Weitz has advice for other funders that might be looking to grow at lightning speed.

“Someone that’s growing so fast while they’re also innovating and looking to close larger transactions that bring them to a bigger place – that’s hard to do all at once. Driving at 200 MPH either works out well and takes you to the finish line or it doesn’t work out really well. It’s really unfortunate that it didn’t work out for them.”

jared weitzDeal Competition

For its part, UCS competes with the likes of LendingTree and other online marketplaces, but that seems only to add an ounce of perspective to Weitz and the UCS team, driving them to adjust and remain nimble so that they can get the next deal.

“Healthy competition is good for us. We welcome anything like that. Some of my best learning experiences have been when we were beat out on a deal. I call the merchant personally and say hey, who gave you the deal? Honestly, I want to sign up with them and offer those rates to my clients. We form a friendship with both the funder and the small businesses,” he said.

UCS also counts some high-profile funders among its partners.

“We’ve worked with some funders forever and it’s been great. But we really had to also find folks that offer certain products but at a cheaper rate,” said Weitz, pointing to the scenario of a merchant having a few of those loans under their belt and improved credit as a result. “They are being solicited by depository banks and can qualify for that rate. We don’t want to lose the relationship. My thought process is sign up with similar folks with that product and when the time comes we can swim the merchant upstream.”

For instance, not all funders offer SBA loans but UCS has been doing so for the past two years. “It’s really kind of taken off for us over the last year. The same thing with accounts receivable and future order financing.”

UCS acts as both a broker and investor in their own deals, so they have a vested interest in the underwriting standards. “Investing with some of our funding partners on the syndication side allows us to have buying power and to take an actual interest in the merchant we’re dealing with,” said Weitz, adding that UCS takes a hybrid approach offering both a fully automated underwriting process for those merchants who want it but also having the capability to talk to the business owners, which is what the large majority of business owners prefer.