Business Lending

Some Alternative Funders See Pot As Next Big Market Opportunity

October 17, 2016
Article by:

Marijuana Industry

This story appeared in deBanked’s Sept/Oct 2016 magazine issue. To receive copies in print, SUBSCRIBE FREE

For some funders, marijuana is not just about sewing their wild oats. Rather, they see the business potential of being early to what’s expected to be a highly profitable and long-lasting party.

Indeed, for the right type of funder, doling out money to marijuana-related businesses is a promising market—certainly in the short term because these companies are so capital-starved. Because marijuana is still classified by the feds as an illegal drug, many related businesses can’t even get a bank account much less access to bank loans or more traditional funding. Many alternative funders are also unwilling to lend to marijuana-related businesses, which has left a significant void that’s beginning to be filled by opportunistic private equity investors, venture capitalists and others.

Meanwhile, rapidly shifting public opinion and state-centered initiatives bode well for what many estimate is a multi-billion dollar market. Indeed, industry watchers say marijuana funding will eventually be an even stronger niche than lending to alcohol producers, tobacco companies or pharmaceuticals because of all the ancillary business opportunities related to medical marijuana use.

marijuana farmer“I think it’s probably the biggest opportunity we’ve seen since the Internet,” says Steve Gormley, managing partner and chief executive at Seventh Point LLC, a Norwalk, Connecticut-based private equity firm that invests in the cannabis industry. “Consumption continues to grow and demand is there,” he notes.

Despite shifting public opinion, legalized marijuana use is still quite controversial. So, all things considered, it takes a particularly thick-skinned funding company—one that has no moral objectives to marijuana and is also willing to accept a significant amount of legal, business and reputational risk—to throw its hat in the ring.

One of the biggest challenges keeping banks and many mainstream funders at bay is that cannabis remains illegal under law. Despite numerous attempts by proponents to scrap marijuana’s outlaw status, the DEA recently dealt out a significant blow by opting to maintain the status quo. This means that for the foreseeable future marijuana remains a Schedule I drug, on par with LSD and heroin, and as a result many lenders will choose to remain on the sidelines for now.

It remains promising, however, that over the past several years, the federal government has taken a more laissez-faire approach, giving individual states the authority to decide how they will deal with legalizing marijuana use. Forty-two states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. territories of Puerto Rico and Guam have adopted laws recognizing marijuana’s medical value, according to the Marijuana Policy Project, an advocacy group. Four states—Alaska, Washington, Oregon, and Colorado—as well as the District of Columbia have gone even further. They allow the recreational use of marijuana for adults, with certain restrictions. Meanwhile, marijuana initiatives are on the November ballot in numerous states.

“I THINK IT’S PROBABLY THE BIGGEST OPPORTUNITY WE’VE SEEN SINCE THE INTERNET”


As these changes have percolated, forward-thinking alternative funders have been dipping their toes in the market—getting an early start on a market that’s hungrily looking for growth capital. “The last couple years there have been fewer investors than capital needed, but we believe that tide is changing,” says Morgan Paxhia, managing director and chief investor of Poseidon Asset Management LLC in San Francisco, an investment management company founded in 2013 to invest exclusively in the cannabis industry.

Paxhia says he’s starting to see more venture capitalists, lease-finance companies and private equity investors willing to provide liquidity to marijuana-based companies that are seeking to grow. The short-term cash advance marketplace, however, is not there yet. The challenge is finding funders willing to do the business with them.

“The people that are building these businesses have to always be worried about their cash. It’s not a given that they’ll get new additional investment,” Paxhia says. “Most people are quick to brush it aside. They won’t give it a minute to take a serious look at it and understand that it is already a multi-billion dollar market growing at 30 percent annualized for the next several years,”

A QUIETLY GROWING INDUSTRY

There are a number of private investors and venture capitalists who have spent the last several years researching and ramping up to invest in what they see as a goldmine of business opportunities. Many of these companies aren’t shy about publicly expressing their support for change.

“We see this as an opportunity of a lifetime to witness a societal change and we want to be a part of it,” says Paxhia who together with his sister runs a $10 million investment fund.

At the same time, there are also some alternative funders who dabble in this space and won’t discuss it publicly—partly because of the perceived stigma and partly out of concern that their financial backers won’t approve. To cover themselves, some are only willing to deal with companies that have hard assets. Often times the rates they offer are much higher than businesses in other industries with comparable financials would pay.

Andrew Vanam, founder of Rx Capital Funding LLC, an ISO in Norwalk, Connecticut, who focuses on the healthcare and medical industry, has helped a handful of few marijuana-related businesses get funding in the past few years and would love to help facilitate more deals. But he says it’s extremely difficult to find lenders that are willing to fund cannabis-related businesses as well as offer reasonable rates. Many of the files he generates in the cannabis space have incredible financials, positive cash flow, and month-on-month growth. However, lenders still treat these businesses as high-risk and offer rates so high it’s not even worth bringing back to a client. Instead, “they are taking hard money loans from private investors that put these cash advance offers to shame,” he says.

Marijuana Dispensary Sign in Springfield, ORASSESSING THE RISKS

Certainly there are risks to funding marijuana businesses. In Colorado—one of the first states to legalize the recreational use of marijuana—values are getting lofty, and people are overpaying for properties that house marijuana-related businesses, notes Glen Weinberg, a partner in Fairview Commercial Lending, a hard-money lender with offices in Atlanta and Evergreen, Colorado.

Weinberg has financed between 75 and 100 commercial real estate loans where marijuana businesses were involved, but says recently he’s shied away. “I’m not comfortable with the valuations at a lot of these marijuana properties,” he says.

Even investors who are bullish on the space urge caution. “If you’re in a [nationwide] market that is growing at about 64 percent per year, that rising tide floats all boats, but there’s a lot of risk, so you have to be careful,” says Chet Billingsley, chief executive of Mentor Capital Inc., a public operating company in Ramona, California, which acquires and provides liquidity for medical and social use cannabis companies.

Billingsley says he has learned some hard lessons through his dealings with about nine marijuana-related companies. For example, he recently won a court judgment against a company that Mentor had supplied with millions of dollars in cash and stock. The company later balked at the terms of the deal and tried to renege, but Mentor ultimately prevailed in court. Still, Billingsley says Mentor went through many unnecessary hassles and racked up $300k in legal costs over the course of its two-and-a-half-year legal battle.

Many business owners in the marijuana space started out during a period when it w as completely illegal. Often these companies march to the beat of their own drum; to protect themselves, lenders need to do more than offer a standard funding contract and hope for the best, Billingsley says.

“The contract has to be solid and it has to be explained in detail to the marijuana operator who is often not sophisticated with regard to contracts.” If you leave things open to interpretation, you’re likely to end up in court, where anything can happen, he cautions.

Companies that fund cannabis businesses say they have very extensive vetting processes—so much so that they turn away a good portion of requests. Jeffrey Howard, managing partner of Salveo Capital in Chicago, says about two-thirds of the companies that come across his desk don’t make it past the company’s initial criteria. “We see a ton of companies and business plans from companies seeking capital to raise money,” he says. “We are going to be very selective about who we invest in and how much.”

Gormley, of Seventh Point, leverages all the same resources he would if he were buying any retail or production manufacturing outfit. He does extremely invasive vetting of the individuals involved and uses private detectives to help.

It many cases it comes down to the business’s management team, according to Paxhia of Poseidon Asset Management. “All the businesses are very early-stage and most companies have a very short track record, so you have to place a greater emphasis on the people,” he says.

OPPORTUNITIES ABOUND

Despite the risks, funders that work in the marijuana space say they are filling an important need by providing capital to marijuana-related businesses. For Gormley of Seventh Point, it’s a calculated risk in an area he’s been following for quite some time. “How often do you get to be part of history, and how often do you get to participate in a burgeoning market?” he says.

Industry participants stress the many funding opportunities aside from companies that cultivate and distribute the plant. Indeed, there are many ancillary businesses that provide products and services geared towards patients and cannabis users without having anything to do with the actual plant.

Howard of Salveo Capital, says his company is gearing up to provide private equity and venture capital to several marijuana-related businesses through its Salveo Fund I and will only make select investments into companies that “touch the plant.” The goal is to eventually have $25 million of committed capital to invest in multiple early-stage companies that offer ancillary products and services to the marijuana industry. “We think there’s more exciting opportunities than ‘touch the plant’ investments,” he says.

Crowdfunding platforms are another avenue for companies in the marijuana space. This type of funding hasn’t yet been utilized to its full potential, industry watchers say.

“I STRONGLY BELIEVE THAT IN THE INTERIM THERE’S A SIGNIFICANT ADVANTAGE FOR PLAYERS LIKE US TO BE FUNDING AND TO BE IN ON THE GROUND FLOOR OF THIS INDUSTRY BEFORE IT CHANGES”


Eaze Solutions, a San Francisco-based provider of technology that optimizes medical marijuana delivery, is one example of a company that turned to crowdfunding. It raised part of a $1.5 million infusion to fund its expansion via the crowdfunding site AngelList in 2014. Loto Labs, in Redwood City, California, is another example. It raised more than $220k via Indiegogo to fund production of its Evoke vaporizer. There’s also CannaFundr, an online investment marketplace for companies in the cannabis industry to gain access to capital.

Cannabis Store in Springfield, ORSeth Yakatan, co-founder of Katan Associates in Hermosa Beach, California, suggests that crowdfunding will become more of an option for certain types of cannabis based companies, specifically those that aren’t as closely tied to the actual production of the plant. “Until federal regulations change, it’s going to be hard to raise money for an entity where you are actively engaged in the cultivation, distribution or sales of a product that’s federally illegal,” says Yakatan, whose company invests in and advises cannabis-related companies that have a biotech or pharmaceutical orientation.

Because laws on legalized marijuana are still in limbo, industry watchers say the market is still many years away from being mainstream. “Public perception will be similar to alcohol in 10 years from now,” predicts Weinberg of Fairview Commercial Lending, adding that he expects banks to enter the funding arena in five to 10 years.

In the meantime, alternative funders who can stomach risk continue to pave the path for others. Howard of Salveo Capital expects private equity investors, venture capitalists and other alternative players to continue playing a big role in getting the nascent industry off the ground.

“I strongly believe that in the interim there’s a significant advantage for players like us to be funding and to be in on the ground floor of this industry before it changes,” Howard says.

Indeed, many alternative funders believe the potential upside significantly outweighs possible negative consequences. “The perceived risk at this point is far greater than the actual risk,” says Paxhia of Poseidon Asset Management.

Secretary Clinton Spoke About Small Business Lending in Goldman Sachs Speech, Wikileaks Reveals

October 16, 2016
Article by:

Hillary ClintonOn October 29th, 2013, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that one of the biggest complaints she gets as she travels around the country is “how do we get more access to credit in today’s current system for small businesses?” This comment was made at a private Goldman Sachs event hosted at the Ritz-Carlton Dove Mountain in Marana, Arizona, according to a transcript published by Wikileaks.

As a contender to become the President-elect in just a few weeks, she appears to understand that small businesses lack access to capital and the shortcomings of the current system. Transcript excerpt below:

ATTENDEE: Secretary Clinton, I’m Patty Greene from Boston College’s Goldman Sachs 10,000 Small Businesses. And first off, thank you for all the work you’ve done with women entrepreneurs both domestically and globally over your career. That’s really meant a lot.

My question is more domestic based. We have the rather unusually organized Small Business Administration, we have the Department of Commerce, and we have programs for entrepreneurs with small business pretty much scattered across every single other agency. How do you see this coming together to really have more of a federal policy or approach to entrepreneurship and small businesses?

SECRETARY CLINTON: I would welcome your suggestions about that because I think the 10,000 Small Business Program should give you an opportunity to gather a lot of data about what works and what doesn’t work. Look, neither our Congress nor our executive branch are organized for the 21st Century. We are organized to be lean and fast and productive. And I’m not — I’m not naive about this. It’s hard to change institutions no matter who they are. Even big businesses in our country are facing competition, and they’re not being as flexible and quick to respond as they need to be.

So I know it wouldn’t be an easy task, but I think we should take a look at how we could, you know, better streamline the sources of support for small businesses because it still remains essential. You know, one of the things that I would love to get some advice coming out of the 10,000 Small Businesses about is how do we get more access to credit in today’s current system for small businesses, growing businesses, because that’s one of the biggest complaints I hear everywhere as I travel around the country. People who just feel that they’ve got nowhere to go, and they don’t know how to work the federal system. Even if they do, they don’t feel like they’ve got a lot of opportunities there. So we do — this is something we need to look at.

You know, I don’t think — I don’t think our credit access system is up to the task right now that is needed. I mean, there are a lot of people who would start or grow businesses even in this economic climate who feel either shut out or limited in what they’re able to do. So we need to be smarter about both private and public financing for small businesses.


More recently, Clinton’s campaign has publicly stated that she wants to “harness the potential of online lending platforms and work to safeguard against unfair and deceptive lending practices.”

UK Banks Will No Longer Be Allowed to Decline Small Businesses For Loans as Alt Lending Wins

October 10, 2016
Article by:

UK Banks better have a strong reason to turn down loan applicants, and if not, turn them over to another lender.

In an attempt to break the might of the big banks and back the thriving alternative finance industry, the UK Treasury will make it obligatory for banks to refer rejected small businesses to other lenders. Nine of the country’s largest banks including Royal Bank of Scotland, Lloyds, Barclays and HSBC will be legally obligated to do so when the plan goes into effect in the next three months, The Times reported.

The applicants will be referred to three loan marketplaces — Funding Options, Funding Xchange and Bizfitech that will make referral fees for loans funded on their platforms.

Online lending across the pond operates differently. The UK online alternative finance sector grew 84 percent in 2015, with support from the government and was one of the first countries to establish a regulatory framework where The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) defines and categorizes crowdfunding, P2P lending and online lending. The UK is home to many early starters in the industry like Zopa and RateSetter.

Merchant Alleged To Have Forged Partner’s Signature On Merchant Loan Charged Criminally

October 9, 2016
Article by:
Mullen's - photo credit: Jessica Fiess-Hill
Photo credit: Jessica Fiess-Hill

It’s not a good idea to forge your partner’s signature, Troy Milbrath has learned, after being arrested on Thursday and charged with 16 felonies and three misdemeanors.

According to the Wisconsin State Journal, Milbrath, an owner of Mullen’s Dairy Bar & Eatery in Watertown, WI, took out loans and opened credit cards in his partner’s name and his partner’s wife’s name, in addition to taking out a merchant loan that his partner didn’t sign for.

His business partner, Todd Narkis, “found a business agreement with his name and Milbrath’s that allowed a financial company to take 35 percent of all credit card swipes at the business in order to pay off a loan,” the Wisconsin State Journal reports.

The business closed last month after the landlord refused to renew the lease. Just days before Milbrath’s arrest, he was reportedly looking to relocate. The business had been open since 1932.

The case number is 2016CF000392 in Jefferson County.

Loan Brokers Have it Easy in Alternative Lending

October 6, 2016
Article by:

NACLB Conference PanelOn a panel at the NACLB Conference in Las Vegas, Tom Zernick, the President of SBA Lending at First Home Bank explained that signing up a broker isn’t so simple. They have to conduct due diligence on them in advance, he said, because ultimately all their broker partners have to be reported to the SBA. Brokers can receive a 1% commission for completing a deal and also charge a separate fee to the merchant on their own but the merchant has to be aware of all of it and all the amounts reported to the SBA, he said.

And even that might not be enough on its own, according to the panel that Zernick was part of. Brokers should be keeping a log of the services performed to earn those fees and the hours spent on each task, like an attorney would.

Contrast that with alternative lending where brokers and fees are not reported to any agency.

One good thing about SBA lending these days though, according to Zernick, is that when he started in the business about 30 years ago, he joked it could take about a year to fund a loan but that today in reality it takes less than 30 days on average to fund.

Brief: PE Giant Warburg Pincus to Acquire Texas Funder Ascentium Capital

October 6, 2016
Article by:

New York-based private equity firm Warburg Pincus agreed to acquire Texas-based equipment financing company Ascentium Capital. The details of the deal remain undisclosed.

Ascentium Capital, with $1.1 billion in assets provides vendor financing, partnering with distributors, resellers to fund their small business customers. And in March this year, it started lending to ISOs and retail merchants directly. The company will be continued to run by CEO Tom Depping who will roll over his stake in the business.

“We see a compelling market opportunity to continue to build Ascentium to become a multi-product capital provider to small businesses through both organic growth and complementary acquisitions,” said Arjun Thimmaya, Managing Director, Warburg Pincus in a statement.

The five year old firm has financed over $2 billion since inception, and funded $225.4 million during Q2 this year. Ascentium’s financial advisor was Goldman Sachs and Vinson & Elkins LLP served as legal counsel.

Personal Network Lender Able Lending Raises $100 Million As Debt

September 28, 2016
Article by:

Able Lending Team

Austin, Texas-based small business online lender Able Lending has secured $100 million in debt financing from San Francisco-based investment firm, Community Investment Management (CIM). 

Able prefers lending to entrepreneurs who raise part of the funds from their personal network of family and friends that Able calls ‘Backers.’  These ‘backers’ typically fund as much as 10 percent of most Able loans whose term loans go up to $1 million with rates starting at 8 percent for companies with revenues over $100,000. 

In June this year, the startup committed to deploy $5 million to fund companies in the Dallas-Forth Worth area right about the time when its rival San Francisco-based Vouch Financial closed shop. Vouch made personal loans based on a ‘vouching network’ of sponsors. 

“During a time when investors’ confidence in alternative lending has plunged, this investment is a vote of confidence in our loan model and our team,” said Able Lending CEO Wills Davis in a statement. The company estimates that it will fund approximately 500 small businesses from the CIM deal.

 

Entire Industries Still Unbankable Despite Big Data Boom

September 28, 2016

Restricted

The use of data and technology for assessing risk shows promise for new borrowers, safer bets and fewer delinquencies. Big data has been credited for overhauling traditional lending models and ushering in a new crop of lenders that do not shy away from risky businesses and low credit scores. But has it been successful in narrowing the list of industries previously ineligible to even be considered? And perhaps there’s a bigger story, that some lenders still maintain a list of industries they cannot or will not lend to despite the boom in data. deBanked checked the temperature on restricted lending practices today with three lenders and here’s what we found.

Jersey City-based World Business Lenders whose average loan size is $150,000 does not lend to startups. According to chief revenue officer, Alex Gemici, startups usually don’t have revenues to justify payments. “Startups fail the ‘ability to pay’ test,” he said.

The restricted industries for WBL are the usual-suspects that fall in the federal legality grey areas like Marijuana related businesses and adult entertainment websites and weapon manufacturers that the company takes a moral stance against. Gemici said that the company has never lent to these industries and will evaluate the policy only if the need arises.

Apart from these WBL also classifies certain establishments as ‘high risk,’ either prone to defaults or without a steady cash flow like car dealers, childcare services, gas stations, real estate speculators, stock brokers, insurance brokers etc. which the company lends to with increased scrutiny and tighter checks.

risky businessOften, the risk appetite of a company depends on how long it has been in business and its funding track record. For instance, San Diego-based National Funding is 17 years old but is gun shy when it comes to lending to auto dealerships, thanks to sustained losses. “We don’t lend to auto dealerships because they already have enough MCA plans out there,” said CEO Dave Gilbert. “It’s too risky to be in that environment without being tied to actual assets, we have had too many losses.”

Government agencies, membership organizations (usually, non profit), insurance brokers, online dating services, weapon manufacturers, credit repair services, gambling and ticket sales websites are also industries the company does not lend to.

However, construction companies, oil companies, transportation and industries with high subsidies like solar businesses are what National Funding considers high risk and will finance cautiously, by tightening the credit window, advancing smaller amounts, demanding higher FICO scores and increasing scrutiny on cash flows.

Irrespective of whether a company automates underwriting, few contest the need for rich and varied data for calculating risk and approving a loan. Kennesaw, Georgia-based IOU Financial, which recently started lending in Canada, has a proprietary ‘Risk Logic’ score for underwriting which includes credit data, financial and non-financial accounts, public records, transactional data and a business owner’s personal credit information.

Despite this, it restricts lending to businesses with seasonal cash flow like tax prep services, industries that invoice out for larger orders including manufacturing, and marijuana dispensaries. IOU also does not lend to industries where it has faced high delinquencies in the past, like oil refinery service related industries and supply chain service providers that are subject to fluctuations in commodity prices.

And if OnDeck, the touted leader in deploying big data for underwriting prohibits 60 industries in five different categories including blood and organ banks, payroll companies and its own kind — non-bank financial companies, has big data really changed underwriting?