Business Lending

Why BFS Capital’s Glazer Is Passing the Torch

August 22, 2017
Article by:
Marc Glazer
Above: Marc Glazer, former CEO/current chairman, BFS Capital

Marc Glazer co-founded BFS Capital in the early 2000s and has remained at the helm all this time – until now. Glazer has passed the torch over to Michael Marrache, effective last week. He isn’t going too far, as the former chief executive will remain chairman of the board working alongside Marrache on the next chapter for the MCA and small business lending company. Meanwhile the executive pair points to a future not only where there is sustainability but where there is growth.

“We’ve obviously grown the company year after year over the last 15 years, and as with every other type of business and industry there were ebbs and flows. Over the last couple of years with a significant amount of challenges going on, we as a company decided we want to continue to grow but we want to grow in a way that benefits the company from a profitability standpoint as well as serves our customers,” said Glazer.

In April 2017, BFS Capital surpassed $1.5 billion in financings since inception. The company expects to fund more than $300 million in new financings in this calendar year.

“We’ll increase our reliance on algorithmic solutions, transparency in the ISO and customer experience and we will increase the number of financing solutions. Culture is significant for us and we will continue to build on the legacy Marc created,” said Marrache.

“I WOULD SAY WE ARE GOING TO CONTINUE FUNDING SMALL BUSINESSES AND FUND MORE OF THEM THIS YEAR THAN WE DID LAST YEAR”


Marrache takes the reigns at a time when the industry is at a crossroads that will leave some alt lenders in the dust while other rise to the occasion.

“The stories that were challenging in 2016 look good in 2017,” said Marrache, pointing to OnDeck’s forthcoming profitability, Kabbage’s lofty valuation, CAN Capital’s return to funding, PayPal’s acquisition of Swift Financial and Prosper looking good.

“We think alternative and non-bank lending are in a good place. And yes, some of the folks that are no longer operating in this space were overextended or may have exhibited irrational behavior for pricing or customer acquisition costs. We think what we’re witnessing is the normal lifecycle of the industry. There were lots of participants earlier. Now to participate the industry must show a bit more control and sophistication. If you execute well, the tomorrows will be better than 2016,” said Marrache.

And according to Glazer, because of the changes in the business environment over the last couple of years, it’s going to require a different skillset to take BFS Capital to the next level.

“There are clear differences between starting a company, growing a company and becoming a billion-dollar small business financing platform. We’ve needed to evolve at each stage and now again with Michael’s leadership,” he said.

Michael Marrache
Above: Michael Marrache, CEO, BFS Capital

For Glazer, Marrache was almost always the succession plan.

“To be fair, hiring Michael four years ago, maybe succession planning was in the back of my mind somewhat. But as our relationship developed and as he was COO for three-plus years and then president, it became apparent that Michael’s skill set, passion, desire and how he looked at culture were all similar to myself. Let’s grow, but let’s watch our numbers. Make sure we treat people fairly. And for the businesses we are financing — provide thoughtful capital to help them versus creating problems for them,” said Glazer.

More Funding

BFS Capital’s business model is comprised both of MCAs and small business loans. Alternative funding company CAN Capital does both MCAs and loans and had to pause lending until recently. For BFS, however, it’s all systems go. And that means unequivocally continuing to fund small businesses.

“Absolutely, yes. And there’s no quizzicality in mind. I would say we are going to continue funding small businesses and fund more of them this year than we did last year. And we will fund even more the year after. So absolutely,” Marrache said.

BFS Capital sells through both ISOs and directly to merchants, the former of which is where most originations derive. “There are a number of solutions we are putting together to benefit that network,” said Marrache, adding he doesn’t believe algorithmic solutions will replace underwriters.

“WE SPENT A LOT OF EFFORT IN OUR [IPO] FILING. BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, THE MARKET FOR THE SPACE HAD SOFTENED”


“We have a strong legacy of customer underwriting. We believe lower level transactions can be significantly more automated. Above a certain level and certain amounts of origination, we think algorithms and data solutions at that point are a facilitator, not a replacement of our underwriting,” Marrache said.

The Legacy

There was a time when BFS Capital’s growth plans included debuting in the public markets. Those plans have since been sidelined amid a chilly investor reception for alternative lender stocks.

“We spent a lot of effort in our filing,” said Glazer. “But at the end of the day, the market for the space had softened. Going forward I think it’s really going to be a question of what the markets look like and what makes sense for our company. We will evaluate that as the situation warrants.”

IPO or not, it appears Glazer’s legacy is still being written.

“I co-founded the company 15-plus years ago. Before finance and accounting, at heart, I’m an entrepreneur. That’s what I do, what I enjoy. I love starting companies, having the vision and creating things,” he said.

As chairman of the board and a major stakeholder, Glazer will continue to be active in BFS Capital.

Tech Banks: Will Fintech Dethrone Traditional Banking?

August 20, 2017
Article by:

This story appeared in deBanked’s Jul/Aug 2017 magazine issue. To receive copies in print, SUBSCRIBE FREE

On Halloween, 2014, a largely unknown, Boston-based financial institution, First Trade Union Bank, embraced high-technology, went paperless, and officially adopted a new name: Radius Bank.

Will Fintech Dethrone Traditional Banking?In reinventing itself, Radius did more than dump its dowdy moniker. It shuttered five of its six branches, re-staffed its operations with a tech-savvy team, instituted “anytime/anywhere” banking services, and offered customers free access to cash via a nationwide ATM network. And it teamed up with a fistful of financial technology companies to offer an impressive array of online lending and investment products.

Today, the bank’s management boasts that, using their personal mobile phones, some 2,700 people per week are opening up checking accounts, funneling $3 million in consumer deposits into the bank’s virtual vault. That’s a stark contrast from a decade ago when the financial institution was being rocked by the financial crisis and “we couldn’t get anybody to walk into our branches,” says Radius’s chief executive, Mike Butler.

“We tried to leave that old bank behind,” he says. “We’re a virtual retail bank now, an efficiently run organization that offers high levels of customer service and Amazon-like solutions.”

Radius Bank is not alone. At a moment when there is much discussion — and hand-wringing — over the future of seemingly outmoded, highly regulated community banks, a coterie of small but nimble banks is exploiting technology and punching above its weight. Almost overnight, this cohort is combining the skill and hard-won experience of veteran bankers with the lightning-fast, extraordinary power afforded by the Internet and technological advances. As a result, these small and modest-sized institutions are redefining how banking is done.

In addition to Radius Bank, independent banks winning recognition for their bold, innovative – and profitable — exploitation of technology, include: Live Oak Bank in Wilmington, N.C., which adroitly parlays technology to become the No. 2 lender to business and agricultural borrowers backed by the U.S. Small Business Administration; Darien Rowayton Bank in Darien, Conn., which is making a name for itself with coast-to-coast, online refinancing of student loans; and Cross River Bank in Fort Lee, N.J., which does back-end work for a passel of fintech marketplace lenders.

“THESE ARE COMPANIES THAT UNDERSTAND THE VALUE OF A BANK CHARTER”


Interestingly, there’s not much overlap. Each of the banks goes its own way. But what all the banks have in common is that each has struck out on its own, each hitting upon a technological formula for success, each experiencing superior growth.

“These are companies that understand the value of a bank charter,” says Charles Wendel, president of Financial Institutions Consulting in Miami. “They have to work under the watchful eyes of state and federal regulators. But their cost of funds is low and they can offer more attractive rates. Because they’re less likely (than nonbank fintechs) to disappear, run out of money, or get sold,” the bank expert adds, “they also have the image of stability with customers.”

These modest-sized banks are emerging as not only pacesetters for the banking industry. Along with making common cause with the fintechs — which had promised to disrupt the banking industry – they’re even beating the fintechs at their own game.

Cary Whaley
Above: Cary Whaley, First VP, ICBA

“Classically, community banks have looked to technology partners to provide technological innovation,” says Cary Whaley, first vice-president for payment and technology policy at the Independent Community Bankers of America, a Washington, D.C.-based trade group representing a broad swath of the country’s 5,800 Main Street banks. “They still do. You’re seeing more partnerships. But now you also see community banks building innovative products and services outside of that relationship. You see forward-thinking banks developing their own technology to support big ideas like marketplace lending, distributed ledger technology, and emerging payments technology.”

With its extraordinary skill at exploiting technology, Live Oak Bank – which trades on the Nasdaq and is the only public company encountered in the cohort — has become a Wall Street darling. “While several banks have adopted an online-only model, and nearly all banks are shifting more and more delivery through online channels, Live Oak was built from the ground up as a technology-based bank,” Aaron Deer, a San Francisco-based research analyst at Sandler O’Neill Partners, wrote in a recent investment note.

Driving the success of Live Oak, which operates out of a single branch in the North Carolina seacoast town and has only been in business for a decade, is the explosive growth in its SBA lending, the bank’s “core strategy,” Deer notes. Last year, Live Oak lent out $709.5 million in SBA loans in increments of up to $5 million, the federal agency reports, making it the country’s No. 2 SBA lender. It trailed only megabank Wells Fargo Bank, the third largest bank in the U.S. with $1.5 trillion in assets, which made $838.93 million in SBA-backed loans last year.

As its SBA lending has taken off, Live Oak, which qualifies as a “preferred lender” with the federal agency, boasts assets that have nearly tripled to $1.4 billion in 2016, up from $567 million two years earlier. Those are flabbergastingly fantastic growth numbers. But just as incongruously — by nipping at the heels of Wells Fargo — Live Oak has been challenging a bank more than a thousand times its asset size for dominance in SBA lending.

And, interestingly, the bank is able to book those outsized amounts of SBA loans while lending to only 15 industries out of 1,100 approved by the government agency, slightly more than 1% of the universe. That’s up from 13 industries in 2015, and Live Oak is adding two to four additional industries yearly for its SBA loan portfolio, Deer reports. Included among the industries to which the bank made an average SBA loan of $1.29 million last year: Agriculture and poultry, family entertainment, funeral services, medical and dental, self-storage, veterinary, and wine and craft-beverage.

“WHEN YOU SPECIALIZE IN SOMETHING, YOU BECOME EFFICIENT”


The bank has a team of financing specialists dedicated to each of the designated industries. Among Live Oak’s current SBA borrowers are Martin Self Storage in Summerville, S.C.; Utah Turkey Farms in Circleville, Utah; Pinballz Arcade, Austin, Tex.; and Council Brewery Company in San Diego. Steve Smits, chief credit officer at the bank, told NerdWallet: “When you specialize in something, you become efficient. Because we do it every day and we have professionals and specialists, we tend to be more responsive and quicker.”

The heady combination of technological sophistication and banking expertise has allowed the lender to slash its loan-origination time to 45 days, about half the three-month industry average for SBA loans. To speed up loan sourcing and generation, the bank developed its own in-house technology, which led to the formation of the Wilmington-based technology company nCino, which was spun off to shareholders in 2014.

Live Oak did not return calls to discuss its lending strategies, but in SEC filings bank management declared: “The technology-based platform that is pivotal to our success is dependent on the use of the nCino bank operating system” which relies on Force.com’s cloud-computing infrastructure platform, a product of Salesforce.com.

Natalia Moose, a public relations manager at nCino told deBanked in an e-mail interview: “We work with Live Oak Bank, in addition to more than 150 other financial institutions in multiple countries with assets ranging from $200 million to $2 trillion, including nine of the top 30 U.S. banks. nCino was started by bankers at Live Oak Bank who found the logistics of shuffling paperwork among loan stakeholders to be unwieldy, inefficient and time-consuming.

Above Video: The nCino community

“nCino’s bank operating system,” Moose adds, “leverages the power and security of the Salesforce platform to deliver an end-to-end banking solution. The bank operating system empowers bank employees and leaders with true insight into the bank, combining CRM (customer relationship management), deposit account opening, loan origination, workflow, enterprise content management, digital engagement portal, and instant, real-time reporting on a single secure, cloud-based platform.”

Live Oak, meanwhile, is not resting on its technological laurels. According to Deer’s report, the bank’s parent company, Live Oak Bancshares, has formed a subsidiary to inject venture capital into fintech companies. It’s already taken a small equity stake in Payrails and Finxact, “the latter of which is developing a completely new core processor to compete against the old legacy systems used by most banks,” the Sandler O’Neill analyst writes. “Quite simply,” he asserts elsewhere in his report, “the company is far beyond any other bank we cover in its technical capabilities and the growth outlook remains outstanding.”

Darien Rowayton Bank - Via Google StreetviewFive hundred and thirty-three miles due north along the Atlantic coast in southeastern Connecticut, Darien Rowayton Bank is also experiencing tremendous success as a lender using a home-grown technology platform. State-chartered by the Connecticut Department of Banking and regulated as well by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., the $600 million-asset bank is winning attention in banking circles for its online student-loan refinancing.

A few years ago, DRB, as it is known, was looking to go beyond mortgage and commercial lending — “the bread and butter for most community banks,” bank president Robert Kettenmann explained to deBanked in a telephone interview – and was somewhat at a loss. The bank considered but then rejected the credit card business. Finally, DRB struck paydirt refinancing student loans. “Our chairman really seized on the opportunity,” Kettenmann says, adding: “It’s a $35 billion market.”

Thanks to the National Bank Act, it’s able to operate in all 50 states. As a regulated commercial bank with a strong deposit base, DRB can also offer low rates well below any state’s usury prohibitions.

What is most striking about DRB’s program is its nationwide targeting of upwardly mobile, affluent young professionals. According to a PowerPoint presentation obtained by deBanked, all of the bank’s super-prime borrowers, who are mainly in the 28-34 age bracket, have a college degree and a whopping 93% have graduate degrees. Average income is $194,000.

Rising PhoenixForty-eight percent of those refinancing student loans with DRB are doctors or dentists and another 22 percent are pharmacists, nurses or medical employees; only about 20% are paying off their law degrees or MBAs. The heavy concentration of refinancing in the medical field reduces economic risk in an economic downturn. Forty-three percent of the borrowers are home-owners, the rest are renters – and prime candidates for an online, DRB-financed mortgage.

(Once known as “yuppies” today this cohort is “known by the acronym ‘HENRY,’” remarks Cornelius Hurley, a Boston University banking professor and executive director of the Online Lending Institute, explaining the initials stand for “High Earners Not Rich Yet.”)

The Connecticut bank partnered with a third-party on-line vendor, Campus Door, when it commenced making student loans in 2013. In the fall of 2016, however, DRB built out its own, proprietary loan-origination system, Kettenmann reports, emphasizing that CampusDoor had been an excellent partner but that the bank wanted to exercise end-to-end control over the process. DRB employs a seven-pronged, “omni-channel” marketing approach that includes interactive marketing, affinity partnerships, digital/online advertising, direct mail, mass-media advertising, and public relations/brand awareness campaigns.

DRB’s online enrollment provides “pre-approved rates” in less than two minutes with final approval on rates in 24-48 hours. Refinancers can complete the online application at their own speed. Through May, 2017, DRB had made $2.48 billion in refinancing to 20,000 student-loan borrowers, with only ten defaults, five of which were attributed to deaths or “terminal illness.”

On Yelp! the bank has received a batch of reviews ranging from very favorable, five-star (“I had a truly wonderful experience”) to one-star (“awful” and “truly a nightmare”). Many fault the application process as laborious, describing it as “time-consuming.” But for those who have succeeded, like the reviewer who counseled “patience,” the result can be “the lowest rate with DRB…my loan payments went down $100 a month.”

Cross River BankJust about an hour’s drive south and taking its name from its proximity to New York city just over the George Washington Bridge is New Jersey-based, state-chartered Cross River Bank, which has a reputation as a partner-in-arms to fintech companies. “We’re both users and producers of technology,” declares Gilles Gade, the bank’s chief executive.

The bank provides “back-end” and infrastructure support to 17 marketplace lenders that offer a suite of lending products including personal loans, mortgages and home-equity loans. Following loan origination by a fintech company – Marlette Funding, Affirm, Upstart, loanDepot, SoFi, and Quicken Loan, among other partners — Cross River does the actual underwriting. Last year, Gade reports, the bank underwrote 1.9 million loans valued at $4-4.5 billion, about 10% of which Cross River kept on its books. The bulk of the loans are sold “back to the marketplace lenders” or to a third party. “We’ve created a high-velocity automated system,” he says.

Gade is manifestly unapologetic about the bank’s role in assisting fintechs in their competition with the banking establishment. “We’re a banking infrastructure services provider for those who want to disrupt the banking system,” he says. “Consumers expect a lot better than they’ve been getting from traditional banking services.”

Radius BankBack in Boston, Radius Bank’s chief executive reports that forging partnerships with fintechs to provide the full panoply of online banking services was no easy proposition. In its mating ritual, Radius not only had to determine that a fintech company’s offerings were sound and that it had the right characteristics – most especially “a long-term, sustainable business model” – but that its corporate culture meshed comfortably with Radius’s.

After meeting with as many as 500 fintechs and after a fair amount of trial and error, Radius formed partnerships with LevelUp, which enables customers to make mobile payments; with online lender Prosper, for refinancing consumer debt and “credit rehabilitation”; with SmarterBucks, for refinancing student loans; and with online investment firm Aspiration Partners – which allows investors to name their own fees and markets itself to a predominately middle-class audience as the firm “with a conscience.”

Radius employs advertising on social media websites and employs “psychographics” to appeal to “anyone who is zealous about using technology, not necessarily millennials,” Butler says. The data show that 65% of adults in the U.S. would prefer to use a traditional bank and have face-to-face interactions with a teller, he notes, leaving the remaining 35% as Radius’s target audience.

Christopher Tremont, executive vice-president for virtual banking, told deBanked that a typical Radius customer is 42 years old, lives in Boston, New York, Chicago “or one of the bigger cities in the West,” is a “technophile,” earns $75,000 a year, and has $100,000 in personal assets.

“COMMUNITY BANKS LOVE THAT PART OF THE BUSINESS—LENDING MONEY”


Radius’s performance since it went paperless has been stellar. The bank has seen a rapid rise in deposits, spurting to $782 million through the first quarter of 2017, up from $565 million at year-end 2014. With little fee income but ample deposits and low-cost funds, Radius realizes the bulk of its revenues – and profits — on the interest-rate spread generated from its loan portfolio.

The bank booked $43.5 million in SBA loans last year, ranking it in the top 50 banks on the SBA’s league tables, while carrying another $105 million in its commercial leasing business at the end of the first quarter this year. Loan generation is driving asset growth, which are currently at $973 billion, up more a third from $726 million in 2014, and Butler expects the bank’s assets to top $1 billion sometime this year.

“Community banks love that part of the business—lending money,” Butler says.

Go West, MCA Broker

August 16, 2017
Article by:
Sean Murray on Union Pacific Train
Above: Sean Murray of deBanked aboard a Union Pacific Train in Fort Worth, Texas

If you check out the deBanked forum, one of the latest discussions originated from a self-described newbie business owner who wants to know, ‘What separates a successful ISO from the rest?’ The user, who calls himself jellyfish capital, asks the deBanked universe:

“I’m trying to figure out what the variables are that would dictate a successful brokerage/ISO vs. a shop that has a ton of turnaround and doesn’t make any money and ultimately ends up shutting its doors.”

The answer just might lie in the types of financial products the broker can sell.

MCA Broker Shift

Noah Grayson is managing director and founder of South End Capital, a commercial and investment residential real estate lender launched in 2009 that also started doing SBA loans and MCA consolidation loans in recent years to help out merchants with stacked MCA positions. Grayson pointed to a shift in the types of brokers signing up with the Encino, Calif-based lender.

“We’ve noticed a large number of brokers signing up with us are coming over from the MCA space. They’ve relayed to our staff that competition is too stiff to make enough money only originating MCAs, and they are looking for other avenues to bring in revenue,” Grayson said.

Indeed, South End Capital has seen an influx of brokers from the MCA industry gravitating their way. In fact, there has been more than a 10 percent spike year-to-date versus the same period last year in the number of brokers that discovered South End Capital through some form of Internet origin, such as deBanked, versus a targeted ad in a real estate related publication or through more traditional real estate origination means.

“What we’re hearing from our MCA industry referral partners is that their[customers] now want any option other than an MCA. These brokers are coming to us now because they are trying to evolve their businesses to stay afloat. Offering real estate or SBA loans has proved to be the next logical step for these brokers and it has provided a big bump to our business,” said Grayson.

As in any industry, making a career change can introduce unexpected challenges. A hurdle for the brokers, particularly as it relates to making the jump to commercial real estate lending, has been unrealistic expectations.

“Many MCA brokers have an expectation that real estate or SBA loans will work similarly to an [MCA], but it’s a more involved process. There’s more documentation and more moving parts to understand. There has been a big learning curve for a lot of these brokers — some have been willing to learn and are excited about the opportunity. However, many MCA brokers have proven extremely resistant to change and unable to adapt” noted Grayson.

There are hurdles facing the MCA industry, too.

business loan brokersMerchant Motivation

So what’s driving the shift? Small businesses, some of which are saddled with short-term obligations, have begun to realize that thanks to the rise of alternative lenders they have more options. Meanwhile unscrupulous collection agencies are throwing a monkey wrench into the situation, making it trickier for merchants to gain access to cash advances.

David Soleimani, CEO of LendFi Corp, said a major setback for the MCA industry has been the interference of collection companies convincing good paying merchants to default and cut their payments in half. By negotiating payments with a third party, merchants essentially become blacklisted from receiving any further MCAs.

LendFi senior account rep Jonathan Meyer specializes in cash advances, term loans, equipment leasing and lines of credit. He’s noticing a trend of more MCA brokers expanding their line of business in the last year.

“Companies are overextended [with cash advances.] It’s a problem,” said Meyer. “If everything is perfect, we can do a term loan or a line of credit if it falls under certain criteria.”

One small business came to LendFi’s Meyer recently and as a result saved himself a lot of cash. “I consolidated someone’s loan recently. I got him a term loan and saved him $14,000 a month. He had two loans at $110,000. I got him a term loan for $165,000 and he saved $14,000 a month. He was paying $22,000 per month,” said Meyer, adding that he also consolidated the payments from a daily to a monthly schedule. “That’s a huge savings,” he said.

For all of the twists and turns that may be up ahead for brokers and merchants alike, one thing seems clear. The MCA industry isn’t going anywhere.

“There will always be a [customer] whose only option is an MCA, and it has its benefits for many. For example, the only way to get business funding in one or two days is with an MCA. However, I think the reasons why someone would need an MCA are becoming fewer and fewer as other more viable financing options emerge,” said Grayson.

PayPal Scoops Up Swift Financial

August 10, 2017
Article by:
Darrell Esch
Above: Darrell Esch, VP and Commercial officer, Global Credit, PayPal

Online lending M&A is under way. PayPal is bolstering its merchant lending capabilities with the addition of Swift Financial. While the deal was kept under wraps, some industry participants heard some buzz about a possible combination.

PayPal has been investing in its lending arm of late, evidenced by the addition of former Amazon executive Mark Britto as senior vice president and general manager of global credit in July.

Noah Grayson, South End Capital managing director and founder, weighed in on the deal.

“A merger of two industry leaders like this is not surprising. As the economy continues to improve and small business owners have access to more financing options, alternative business lenders are going to continue to consolidate to stave off competition, retain deal flow and secure profitability,” said Grayson.

Dave Girouard, founder and CEO at Upstart, a consumer lending platform that uses machine learning, reacted to the deal:

“I expect to see more consolidation in online lending across both consumer and small business in the next year. Platforms with either giant balance sheets or proprietary technology will likely stick around, but others will struggle to compete,” Girouard told deBanked.

Alternative lender LendUp was a recent recipient of a PayPal investment. Sasha Orloff, LendUp’s CEO, had this to say about the deal:

“I’m not surprised to see an acquisition in the fintech credit space and expect this will kick off a wave of acquisitions. PayPal is a force to be reckoned with and we have seen them lead the industry again and again. Whether it is the partner model like with Synchrony, the acquisition model like Swift, Braintree/Venmo, Xoom, or the investment model like LendUp, they are proving again and again why they are leading innovation in financial services decade after decade,” said Orloff.

Meanwhile don’t expect to see a PayPal/LendUp pairing anytime soon.

“For our part, we’re going after a very different market and we’re focused on driving consumer financial inclusion — and we’re very focused on remaining an independent company and helping companies like PayPal and banks offer better products for millennials and the emerging middle class,” Orloff added.

PayPal was already working with Swift on a white-label basis for one of its products, PayPal Business Loan, which is a term loan with structured repayments.

“Swift Financial offers complementary business financing solutions and advanced underwriting capabilities that accelerate our ability to acquire new merchant partners with business financing solutions and to deepen our relationships with existing merchants and channel distribution partners,” said Darrell Esch, VP and Commercial officer, Global Credit, PayPal, pointing to Swift’s advanced underwriting and product capabilities and seasoned management team.

Swift was launched just over a decade ago and has extended loans to 20,000-plus merchants.

Breslow: The Advantage Goes to Scale Players

August 8, 2017
Article by:

Noah Breslow, CEO, OnDeck

Above: Noah Breslow, CEO, OnDeck

OnDeck’s recent quarter answered a host of questions that surrounded the online lender, touching on everything from market share gains, to year-end profitability, to double-digit loan origination growth on the horizon. Another major growth driver that took the spotlight was the partnership between OnDeck and JPMorgan Chase, which has been cemented with expanded terms.

Noah Breslow, OnDeck’s CEO, told deBanked the partnership, which is bigger than any other relationship the online lender has formed, is firing on all cylinders.

“Ever since the product was introduced in April 2016 we’ve seen nice growth, incredible customer satisfaction and sound credit performance,” said Breslow.

In fact, the Chase partnership has been not only a flagship deal for OnDeck but very possibly the online lending community as a whole.

“We think it’s a harbinger of what’s to come in the space. Chase took a very forward thinking move a year and a half, two years ago when it decided to work with us to build a product,” said Breslow, adding that OnDeck remains in discussions with a number of large financial institutions about providing similar services and capabilities for online business lending.

The partnership, which started off as a pilot program between OnDeck and Chase, is a testament to JPMorgan’s commitment not only to OnDeck but also small business lending, which has taken it on the chin since the financial crisis. Under the new terms the relationship will continue for another four years.

“A whole segment of small businesses doesn’t want to borrow $5 million or $500,000. They want $50,000. The traditional bank lending process is not set up to make loans very efficiently,” said Breslow, pointing to the costs and time involved that cause banks to shy away from doing this.

OnDeck uses a score, dubbed the OnDeck score, that Breslow likens to a FICO score for small businesses. “The OnDeck score is built for our population. It looks at cash flow, personal and business credit, the industry and geography of the business, other debt, taking a holistic view of performance of the business than only FICO and cash flow,” he said.

JPMorgan Chase sets how much risk they want to take or not take with the loans they issue on the OnDeck platform, leveraging both their own data as well as data OnDeck has collected over the past decade of lending. Chase’s small business lending program remains invite-only.

“Small business owners will receive an email or phone call or some other form of solicitation, and then they can come to the website and get approved. We think over the next couple of years Chase will expand the scope of the program, but we’re not talking about how and when they are going to do that,” Breslow said.

OnDeck has taken a series of steps to strengthen the company’s balance sheet in recent months, not the least of which has been to tighten lending standards, which admittedly led to lower loan originations in Q2. Nonetheless the company expects to rebound with double-digit growth in loan originations in 2018, albeit off a low base.

OnDeck has largely completed a cost reduction plan that was started in 1H2017 and essentially removed $45 million in annual expenses from its P&L. “That was a lot of work to take on in a short period of time. We went heads down and got through it. In conjunction with that we rationalized our credit policy and our credit standards to be more conservative to reduce loss rates. The combination of those two moves set the business up to be profitable at the end of the year,” said Breslow.

These steps are resonating with institutional investors, including Mario Cibelli, managing partner at Marathon Partners Equity Management, which has an investment in OnDeck. He characterized the Chase extension as “good stuff.” “I think they had a solid quarter. They’re following through on some of their promises and I’m continuing to monitor our investment,” Cibelli said.

While OnDeck appears to be out of the woods, Breslow shared his perception of the industry.

“The advantages of online lending go to market leaders and scale players. Some folks with lower levels of scale can’t get credit performance right and don’t have enough capital to build out their business,” said Breslow.

With the expanded JPMorgan Chase relationship, gaining scale is on the horizon while some of the hard times appear to be in the rear-view mirror.

“The nice thing is we’re focused on growth again. The message we wanted to communicate yesterday is that we have all the capital we need to lend after the progress we made in the past year. We refinanced $850 million in credit facilities or added new credit facilities. So we have a great balance sheet that’s healthier than it’s ever been from a capital perspective. Now it’s about growing responsibly and profitably as we head into 2018,” said Breslow.

Funding Circle’s Hodges Talks $250 Billion Opportunity

August 3, 2017
Article by:

Sam HodgesFunding Circle, a marketplace that matches small businesses with lenders, broke a new barrier in the first half of 2017 with an 80 percent spike in global lending by about GBP 800 million. The U.S. marketplace lending arm, which was merged with UK-based Funding Circle in 2013, has experienced rising momentum over the same period.

Sam Hodges, Funding Circle co-founder and U.S. managing director, told deBanked that small business lending remains an underserved and untapped market, attaching a USD 250 billion value on the annual lending opportunity.

“I co-founded Funding Circle in the U.S. after experiencing firsthand how hard it is for established, successful businesses to access financing from the traditional banking system. The traditional banking system is broken and restricted by legacy issues, and most banks don’t view smaller-ticket commercial lending as their bread and butter.”

Since 2010, when Funding Circle was launched, investors including 60,000-plus individuals, financial institutions and the UK government have poured more than USD 4 billion into 32,000 businesses globally.

Currently the Funding Circle U.S. platform is only open to accredited and institutional investors. “Over time, we would love to offer this investment product to anyone in the U.S.,” said Hodges.

He further explained that Funding Circle marketplace enables investors to diversify their fixed-income portfolios with secured business term loans. All of the loans on the Funding Circle platform are pre-screened with a risk-rating and coupon rate attached, ranging from 4.99 percent to 27.79 percent, by seasoned credit professionals using proprietary data analytics.

“While there will always be some risk attached to any type of investing, Funding Circle concentrates on providing loans to established businesses that have operating history, cash flow and a strategic plan for growth,” said Hodges.

Main Street USA

Funding Circle borrowers have typically been in business for around a decade and generate annual revenue of $2 million with a staff of about 10 people. One key differentiator from the likes of industry giant Amazon Lending is that borrowers on the Funding Circle platform could be brick and mortar shops.

“Amazon is an impressive organization, but what we’re doing is different in a variety of ways. Where they are focused on helping merchants that sell on their marketplace, our borrowers include restaurateurs, gas stations, medical clinics, construction firms, IT consultants and more,” said Hodges.

He went on to describe Funding Circle borrowers: “Walk down Main Street in any American town, and you’ll see examples of our borrowers. These are established businesses who have been underserved by the traditional financial sector — they have assets and cash flow to secure loans, and a legitimate plan for growth. We actually have many borrowers who choose our loans over a traditional bank loan, because they are faster and easier.”

Full Circle

Funding Circle started off the year with a bang, having raised USD 100 million in equity capital to help accelerate growth not only in the U.S. but also the UK and continental Europe. Meanwhile the startup continues to invest heavily in technology and talent.

“We are focused on building a world-class technology platform that can handle millions of transactions daily and deliver a best-in-class customer experience for borrowers and investors,” Hodges told deBanked.

Along those lines, Funding Circle recently bolstered its executive team both stateside and globally, including the recent addition of Sean Glithero as CFO, who is to be based in London when he begins in his new role this fall.

“Sean shares our enthusiasm for building a better financial world by revolutionizing the financial system and securing a better deal for everyone. Sean’s record at Auto Trader, helping drive strong profit growth and shaping a digital marketplace into a dominant position, makes him ideally suited for this role,” Hodges said.

Meanwhile the U.S. executive team is also expanding, evidenced by the recent additions of Joanna Karger as U.S. Head of Capital Markets and Richard Stephenson, who joined as U.S. Chief Compliance Officer.

He is taking the reins of a balance sheet whose UK business achieved profitability in the first half of 2017. “Here in the U.S. we are doing quite well and continue to invest in growth” concluded Hodges.

Marcus Lemonis Rebuked Kabbage on Twitter

August 3, 2017
Article by:

Inkkas The Profit

Above, a screenshot of Marcus Lemonis doing a deal with Brooklyn-based shoe brand Inkkas on Season 3

While the fintech community heralded Kabbage’s $250 million Series F round this morning, small business fixer and CNBC TV star Marcus Lemonis was not impressed.

On twitter, Lemonis wrote to Squawk Box host Carl Quintanilla, who was airing a segment about Kabbage, to say that Kabbage charged ridiculous rates. The short rant, which totaled 4 tweets, zinged Kabbage by calling them a lender of last resort and “not a friend of small business.”

Though Lemonis did not respond to my tweet that asked him if there were any online lenders he thought positively of, he likely is no stranger to the phenomenon. Last year, I pointed out that several small businesses that have appeared on his show, The Profit, have used nonbank alternatives.

In Season 3, Da Lobsta, a Chicago Sandwich shop, reported owing $140,000 to an internet lender and $40,000 to Square.

Square Capital, which has since traded merchant cash advances for actual loans, reported making 49,000 loans to small businesses last quarter alone for a total of $318 million. Kabbage, meanwhile, has lent $3.5 billion to more than 115,000 small businesses in their lifetime.

Square Capital Funded $318M in Q2

August 3, 2017
Article by:

Square’s small business lending arm, Square Capital, issued 49,000 business loans for a total of $318 million in Q2, according to their earnings report. That’s a quarter-over-quarter increase of 26.7% and slightly more than half the loan volume that their rival OnDeck originated in Q1. That statistic is significant because Square is a payment processor first and a lender second while OnDeck is only a lender.

Square had a net loss of $16 million in the second quarter on $552 million in revenue. The stock price has nearly doubled year-to-date, according to the deBanked Tracker.

32% of Square Capital users say they are using the funds to purchase equipment or open a new store. 31% say they are using it to purchase inventory while 23% say it’s to fund day-to-day general & administrative expenses and marketing expenses.

In December 2016, deBanked received a $35,000 loan from Square, the experience of which was detailed in the Jan/Feb Magazine issue.