Archive for 2021
OnDeck Proving to be Extremely Valuable Acquisition for Enova
April 30, 2021When Enova acquired OnDeck, it thought that the company’s legacy portfolio would have very little value. Now that the dust has settled, it’s become a gold mine. “We now expect to receive over $200 million of total cash from the acquired portfolio, net of securitization repayments,” said Enova CEO David Fisher in the company’s quarterly earnings call.
Enova reported that small business lending was now more than 50% of their portfolio and that they recorded originations of $322 million in small business funding in Q1.
“From an operational perspective, the integration of OnDeck is largely complete,” Fisher added. “Our three SMB products are working together as a single business, and we are on track to deliver more than the forecasted $50 million of annual cost synergies, primarily from eliminated duplicative resources as well as $15 million in run rate net revenue synergies.”
OnDeck’s lending business has also allowed the company to price a $300 million securitization debt facility, backed by OnDeck term loans and lines of credit.
“We’re pleased to report a record first quarter of profitability, driven by solid credit performance, improving originations, and disciplined expense management,” said Fisher. “We are encouraged by the recent signs of a recovery in demand and believe that our diverse product offerings, nimble machine-learning-powered credit risk management capabilities, and solid balance sheet position us well to profitably accelerate growth as the economy continues to recover.”
IOU Financial Posts 2020 Results
April 29, 2021IOU Financial filed their full-year 2020 financial results, boasting a total of $84.9 million in originations. Though at a $3.2 million net loss and decrease of 45% in originations from 2019, IOU representatives attest the firm weathered the worst of the pandemic and has left the other side prepared to take part in fueling “the recovery ahead.”
Shares of IOU are trading at about 8 cents, creating a market cap of just under $10 million. In 2020, Neuberger Berman acquired a significant stake in the company and agreed to purchase up to $150M in loans a year over two years. Founder and CEO Phil Marleau will transition into an advisory role on June 10th, replaced by Robert Gloer, COO.
“Robert and I have worked side-by-side since the Company was founded,” said Marleau. “Together, we underwrote our first small business loan in December 2009 and have since originated nearly US$1 billion in loans. IOU’s resilience and success are a direct result of the team’s considerable efforts over the past decade – a team that Robert and I have built and led. I look forward to continuing our partnership in an advisory capacity and as Director.”
At Least One Firm is Leaving New York before Disclosure Law Lands
April 29, 2021New York MCA firms are in the dark. In January, the governor delayed implementation of the APR disclosure bill until 2022. But the bill leaves it to the Department of Financial Services (DFS) to finalize how it will all work and not everyone is confident the outcome will be positive for business in New York State.
For example, Greenwich Capital, a small business funding company, has decided to move from Manhattan to Hoboken, NJ in preparation for the law. They anticipate that the cost of compliance will be high enough to warrant a trip on the PATH starting now rather than when it may be too late to contemplate later.
“There’s a lot of ambiguity, and our five-year lease was up,” Rich Gipstein, General Counsel at Greenwich Capital, said. “We’ll be moving to Hoboken for the time being and see what’s going on with this law. But in the meantime, it’s a lot cheaper for us.”
Based on vague wording language like double-dipping, Gipstein said there is no clear way to tell who or what the law aims to regulate. At least for his firm, it’s better to sit this one out.
“I think there’s quite a lot left open, and it’s intended to be broad,” Gipstein said. “There won’t necessarily be much time to know what the law means until it’s effective. I think there will probably be some lead time, but likely not quite enough for most businesses in the industry to adapt.”
For example: when does a deal become a “specific offer” and come under the purview of the law? In an industry where deals are won through cold calling, social media blitzes, and emails, when would it become necessary to disclose an APR? In a DM on LinkedIn? Rich said it is unclear what a “provider” is, whether it be funders, brokers, or ISOs. In the bill, a provider is required to make commercial financing disclosure clear and let a recipient know at the time of the “specific offer” the all-inclusive rates of a product. Without clarity, it’s hard to predict what the cost of compliance will be.
“I think, from my reading of it and from my understanding of New York’s position, it would seem that they are trying to regulate both funders and brokers under the same regulation,” Gipstein said. “I think it’s possible that the legislature intentionally left some things vague for DFS to fill in. The law basically says, ‘there’ll be regulations that will make this make sense.'”
Gipstein said it’s common for politicians to leave it to the regulators to finish the job, after all, the DFS has its nose to the grindstone in the day-to-day. But when a law affects an entire industry like this, Gipstein said it is uncommon for changes to be left until the last moment.
“It’s more than just disclosure requirements; this is not similar to what California did,” Gipstein said. “The law also dictates how to calculate the projected sales volume. You’re required to either use the historical method, in which you must always use the same number of months leading up to the deal, or you can opt-out and use your own projection. But if you use your own projection, that opens you up to disclose the results of all your deals to the government… It’s almost like an annual audit.”
The historic method doesn’t really work, Rich said when the industry comprises atypical merchants who wouldn’t be looking for funding if traditional methods could predict their sales volume. When it comes to self-declaring and letting the government poke around: Gipstein said the way a funder evaluates deals is proprietary. It’s what sets them apart; it’s the value proposition.
Greenwich Capital isn’t alone in their assessment. The Small Business Finance Association (SBFA), a trade group comprised of similar financial companies, has also been vocal about the law’s perceived shortcomings.
“You have a group of companies that are pushing these types of disclosures, for no reason other than their own self-interest,” said Steve Denis, executive director of the SBFA, back in October. “We’re fine with disclosure, we are all for transparency, but it needs to be done in a way that we believe is meaningful to small business owners.”
Denis had further said that those firms taking credit for writing the laws are the same companies that will end up suffering under the strict tolerance of an APR rule.
“The companies pushing this, the trade associations pushing it, they like to take credit for writing the bill in California and writing the bill in New York: I don’t even think they’ve read it,” Denis said at the time. “It’s going to subject their own members to potentially millions if not hundreds of millions of dollars in potential liability [fines.]”
When the DFS finalizes the terms, it will likely make dealing with disclosure too costly to remain in New York State, Gipstein said.
Gipstein said we’ll have to wait and see if NY-based brokers will have to go through extra compliance even if their funders or merchants are out of state. The worst-fear scenario is a possibility that after New Years’ 2022, out-of-state funders will stop working with NY brokers entirely, just because they live in NY. Merchants in the state, subject to the law, may find commercial finance a barren marketplace.
“We’ve got a lot of different things to manage as we grow, and one of the things we don’t want to do is create is a large compliance department,” Gipstein said. “It’s just cheaper for us, after doing a cost-benefit analysis, to move to a different state. We’re probably not going to be a New York funder by 2022.”
BFS Capital is Now Nuula
April 29, 2021“The reimagined future of BFS starts now, and today I’m proud to announce that BFS Capital has become Nuula,” wrote BFS Capital CEO Mark Ruddock on LinkedIn. In a lengthy post, he explained that the company has shifted its “philosophy from solely selling loans acquired primarily from brokers, to providing a more holistic, customer-centric mobile app that entrepreneurs would find useful each and every day.”
“Nuula is a mobile application that gives small business owners instant access to critical business metrics anytime, anywhere.
It allows real-time monitoring of cash flow, personal and business credit activity, and social ratings and reviews. Small business owners know immediately if there’s an issue with their cash, credit, or reputation that requires action.
But this is just the beginning.”
“With regards to our legacy business, our team will continue to support our existing customers and partners as we transition all our services to Nuula,” he added. “Our existing customers will be the first to be offered a chance to experience Nuula. And over the next few weeks, our existing working capital customers will be able to unlock additional capital from the first of our Nuula ecosystem partners, with exciting incentives and in a way that is as seamless as possible. We expect to make that announcement soon.”
Shopify Capital Q1 SMB Funding Soars
April 28, 2021Shopify Capital posted monster figures on Wednesday, originating $308.6 million total in MCA and loans. Across the US, Canada, and the UK, Shopify saw a 90% increase from Q1 last year.
In total, Shopify Capital originated $794 million in 2020, and with a blistering first quarter, it may be on track to originate over a billion dollars this year.
“Shopify’s momentum continued into 2021 as digital commerce tailwinds remained strong and merchants took advantage of the range of capabilities offered by our platform,” Shopify CFO Amy Shapero said in an earnings statement. “We are focused on building a commerce operating system that will help shape the future of retail. Our merchant-first business model positions us to capture the massive opportunity presented by the growth of digital commerce, benefiting both our merchants and Shopify.”
Overall, total revenue for Q1 was $988.6 million, a 110% increase year over year. Nearly a third of the posted revenue was small business lending and MCA funding.
American Express Has Begun Rolling Out the Kabbage Platform
April 28, 2021Kabbage was hardly featured in American Express’s Q1 earnings report but the recently acquired company was raised in the official call.
Kabbage is an example of how American Express plans to deepen their relationships with current customers and attract new ones by offering a range of solutions beyond the card, said company CEO Steve Squeri. “And in Q1, we began the rollout of the Kabbage platform, which includes a business checking account and working capital solutions to our small-business customers.”
Squeri also said that Kabbage will play a specific role in their post-pandemic plans.
“And you know, as we’ve talked about travel coming back, it comes back in layers. It comes back with consumer, then it’s SMB, and then it’s lodging, corporate. So it is a very different business, which is why we went and acquired Kabbage to have a digital front for these SMEs where they can not only get their card spending done but also get working capital loans, have a transaction bank account, have a merchant financing loan, have short-term loans, and things like that.”
The Death of A Thousand Financial Companies
April 28, 2021Unfortunately, Deleting Your Business May Not Be An Option One Can Risk.
In March 2021, deBanked revealed that 7.5% of DailyFunder’s user base that had existed in March 2020, was lost during the pandemic. DailyFunder, of course, is the most widely used forum for small business finance brokers and the statistic offered one of the most compelling insights into the damage inflicted on the industry.
A loss was defined as a user whose email address ceased to exist. It was either deleted or the domain name was not renewed. It was a startling revelation. And yet, in a sign of optimism, DailyFunder added more new users in that 12 month time frame than were lost.
And yet, is anything ever truly deleted in the digital age? And how did it come to pass that the owners of these companies believed deletion to be a preferable outcome to transference? Surely as a thousand brokerages closed, there would have been an eager buyer to scoop them up, even if the sales price was for pennies?
And so I arrived at a theory, that companies that simply wound up and disappeared rather than sold themselves off, probably left behind a digital footprint that still drew in prospective customers, a path that ultimately led nowhere. A competitor might rejoice at that outcome but it’s not exactly a net gain because that customer may have decided to go somewhere else or nowhere else instead. Someone else’s loss wasn’t their win. Even the customer was a net loser. That could be resolved, of course, if the competition simply acquired the expired domain names of their fallen competitors, something that could be reasonably achieved for the price of ten bucks through any domain name registrar.
Outside of the small business finance industry, such tactics are commonplace. One can simply go on Godaddy’s domain auctions to see the never-ending revolving door of expiring domains which are often ranked and priced on the basis of how much traffic they stand to generate, mainly because of the past owners’ efforts.
According to WhoIsHostingThis, 70% of all web domains fail to be renewed 1 year after they’re purchased. “[41% of these expired domains] go on to be snapped up and registered by other users to potentially benefit and profit from,” they say. And there is nothing controversial about this. This is simply a standard of the world wide web. Your fallen online business is recycled as someone else’s marketing tool.
Applying that math to the small business finance industry at hand, that would mean that of 1,000 brokerage failures, 41% of the expired domain names are going to be acquired by someone else or they already have been. And if the expired domain only costs $10 (and they’re not all this cheap), then theoretically one could acquire the web traffic of 410 failed brokers for roughly $4,000.
WHOA.
The realization led me to conduct a controlled experiment, one in which I would try to prove this theory for a deBanked story.
I bought roughly twenty expired domains, intentionally leaning toward older ones, domains that had been expired for 2-10 years rather than recent casualties of the pandemic. Once completed, I jotted down my hypothesis, that these domain names probably produced some level of prospective customer traffic.
When my experiment concluded, I became alarmed, even sick, over what the results taught me. Deletion, I learned, is an outcome that no business, let alone a financial services company, can afford to surrender themselves to.
Here’s why:
Among the first steps taken was to create a “catch-all” email account on each domain so that if a former owner of a domain came along and tried to contact me, I would get it no matter which address they tried and that I would be able to tell them that I had acquired it accordingly and even tell them my theory!
No marketing or anything was done for any of the domains. I simply acquired them and let them sit stagnant. I did not resurrect whatever their old websites were. And yet, I received thousands and thousands of emails, none from what I could tell were from former owners.
It’s important to state that I did not use these accounts to actually do anything, but that these vulnerabilities came to light by virtue of monitoring the inbound emails these domains accrued.
Some domain names still had control of social media accounts like business facebook pages and twitter accounts. Someone could not only acquire your old domain, but use it to resurrect and use dormant social media accounts, including being able to view all past private correspondence on them. Yikes.
Some domain names were still attached to active bank accounts, credit card accounts, or financial services. Correspondence regarding these accounts was still being transmitted to them. When you delete a domain, you need to make sure its access is revoked from every account you have, especially bank accounts. Some received NSF notices or were being subject to debt collection efforts.
Every domain name was subscribed to newsletters or communities or some service in which one could use to learn personal information or business information about the previous owner.
Unknown but likely is that some of these domains may have been the “lost password” email address of record for other accounts online, a particularly troubling thought.
As the litany of stroke-inducing vulnerabilities piled up, then came live correspondence. Lenders wanted to know where to send a still-owed commission, a borrower was reaching out for customer service, old business partners were trying to rekindle past relationships.
Presumably such domains could give someone access to portals or databases where previous customer data was held. This implies that not only is the old domain owner at risk but that business vendors that had not disabled access to their systems for the defunct users could also be at risk from nefarious actors now in control of email addresses belonging to former customers.
A nefarious actor could surely dream up still more ways to carry out compromising acts. I disabled incoming email altogether for the domains pretty soon into my aforementioned discoveries so that emails to those domains would simply bounce back and indicate to the sender that there’s nobody there anymore.
And my original hypothesis had been blown to smithereens. These domains generated no material web traffic of note, except for probing “bots” instead of human users. What I thought might be a hidden source of web traffic, a clever insight on internet marketing 101, instead turned out to be a glimpse into a business’s worst nightmare.
No matter how much one’s business has failed, control over the domain name should be preserved at all cost, that is unless, all of the above vulnerabilities are addressed first and completely.
Originally, the costs of this journalistic experiment were to be recouped by simply reselling the domains onto the public market for fair market value. Instead, they were simply cancelled, cast back in the sea anonymously, where anyone else could buy them and do whatever they want with them. I, however, made no effort to alert anyone’s attention to them.
The publication of this story was delayed as I, the journalist, had to weigh the merits of disclosing my findings. But as the data says, 41% of expired domains are going to get snapped up anyway. And true to form, I was actually outbid by other unknown buyers by some of the original domain names I had hoped to acquire for my experiment. A financial service company’s domain and all the vulnerabilities with it, were sold to bidders willing to pay $30, $40, or $50+ versus my $10-$20 or so budget. That seems a terrifyingly small cost. And I highly doubt they were journalists.
Perhaps those domains are generating web traffic, but if they’re not, one has to ponder why someone would want to acquire the lapsed domains of so many dead financial service companies. And post-pandemic, there are too many to count.
If the death of a thousand companies has taught me anything, it’s that even business failure needs a well thought-out security plan. Otherwise one risks death by a thousand cuts.
Loan Fraudsters Resorting to AI Generated Faces
April 27, 2021According to a sneak peek posted by Lendio CEO Brock Blake, fraudsters are stopping at nothing to game the government’s emergency loan system.
“Wanna glimpse into what lenders are experiencing with attempted fraudulent applications?” Blake wrote in a tweet. “Here are four ‘applicants’ seeking a loan.”
Four pictures showing computer-generated “business owners” all have the same sweater, but different heads. People are using AI tech to create randomized, just barely discernible pics of borrowers holding IDs beside them to beat new compliance measures.
It’s like a techno arms race between an automated scanning system that looks for fakes versus an automated fake ID and person generator that tries to make passable fakes.
After a year of PPP and EIDL success stories and fraud concerns, funders are still beating back scam artists. During a recent U.S. Senate hearing, SBA Inspector General Mike Ware said his office had secured $2.1 billion in fraudulently claimed PPP and EIDL loans.
In related news, the SBA announced the $28.6 billion Restaurant Revitalization Fund applications would open on Monday, May 3. Fraudsters start your fake restaurant owner generators.
Wanna glimpse into what lenders are experiencing with attempted fraudulent applications?
Here are 4 different “applicants” seeking a #ppploan. pic.twitter.com/kdbLmNGlvt
— Brock Blake (@BrockBlake) April 26, 2021