Legal Briefs
Kalamata Capital / Biz2Credit Lawsuit Settled
January 31, 2018An old dispute between Kalamata Capital and Biz2Credit came to an end today, according to court records. A stipulation of discontinuance with prejudice was filed that confirmed the parties had settled all matters between them.
Kalamata Capital had originally brought the action against Biz2Credit in December 2014.
Law Firm Sued for Tortious Interference With Loans and MCAs
January 31, 2018Rhode Island Superior Court has a tortious interference case on its hands. Small Business Term Loans, Inc., and BFS West, Inc. v Christopher M. Mulhearn, and Law Office of Christopher M. Mulhearn, Inc. is yet another front in the debt settlement war enveloping the alternative finance industry.
Here, the plaintiffs (known to many as BFS Capital), allege that Mulhearn and his law office attempt to persuade BFS Capital’s customers to breach their obligations to BFS Capital while routinely making misleading representations to their customers, including by promising to save them money by settling their obligations to BFS Capital for a discounted amount when they have no legitimate basis for being able to make such promises.
At least seven customers are alleged to have breached their agreements as a result of the defendants’ actions.
The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint. The suit is registered in Providence/Bristol County Superior Court of Rhode Island under case # PC-2018-0094.
Other such companies that have found themselves on the receiving end of a tortious interference lawsuit include MCA Helpline, Protection Legal Group, and Creditors Relief.
Default Judgment Against MCA Company Vacated
January 30, 2018A default judgment against a South Florida merchant cash advance company has been vacated, according to court records. 1st Global Capital fell victim to a mishap last November when they failed to a respond to a lawsuit defendant’s counterclaim of usury.
1st Global, who learned about it through a blog post, responded by filing a motion to set the judgment aside. On January 26th, however, the Court approved a settlement reached by both parties. A stipulation was that the judgment be vacated.
The case is now closed.
Attorney Suing Dozens of MCA Companies Disqualified as Counsel
January 29, 2018
Rayminh Ngo, an attorney with Higbee & Associates that has appeared in no less than 80 lawsuits against merchant cash advance companies in New York State, hit a fatal roadblock in one case, court records reveal. That’s because Ngo and Higbee aren’t qualified to practice law in the State of New York. This disturbing matter was brought to light and evaluated by the Honorable Jerome C Murphy, a judge in Nassau County, late last month.
Platinum Rapid Funding Group, the plaintiff against a party that Ngo was representing, argued that the defendant’s attorney was in violation of Judiciary law §470, specifically that Ngo and the law firm did not have an office in New York State and consequently could not represent a client in New York.
Ngo denied the assertion and argued that he did in fact have offices there. But the evidence was not on his side. The two addresses he provided turned up empty, according to process servers who visited both locations. And the lease agreements submitted as exhibits were not valid for the time period in question.
“In the end, this Court finds that there is no evidence on this record that Ngo and Higbee had physical addresses in New York,” the order on the matter read. Ngo and Higbee were therefore disqualified as counsel of record. They have filed a notice of appeal in response.
That he has appeared in dozens of other lawsuits in the State was not addressed in the order, but it may be worth noting to his opponents both past and present that pursuant to this Court, they cannot practice in New York.
You can view the decision here.
The decision arose in Platinum Rapid Funding Group, Ltd. v. H D W of Raleigh, Inc. d/b/a Pure Med Spa, a/k/a Pure Cosmetic and Surgical Center and Holly Donielle Wybel a/k/a Holly D. Wybel, Index # 605890/2017 in New York Supreme Court.
MCA Helpline, A Debt Settlement Company, is Sued For Tortious Interference
January 25, 2018
Debt settlement is under fire again. This time it’s a trio of defendants, namely MCA Helpline, LLC, Decision One Debt Relief, LLC and Todd Fisch individually, according to a complaint filed by plaintiff Everest Business Funding on Wednesday in Broward County, Florida.
Everest is seeking damages for Defendants’ tortious interference with at least a dozen of its merchant contracts.
“Defendants have engaged and continue to engage in the business practice of making misleading representations to Everest’s customers; namely, promising to save the merchants money on their existing contracts with Everest when they have no intention or ability to uphold such a promise,” the complaint states. “In so doing, Defendants tortiously interfere with Everest’s merchant agreements by inducing the merchants to breach their contractual obligations to Everest in favor of entering a new payment relationship with the debt relief company.”
Fisch is alleged to be the mastermind behind both MCA Helpline and Decision One Debt Relief.
Complicit ISOs were also put on notice. “To the extent any specific ISOs or their affiliates who have ISO Agreements with Everest have leaked information about Everest’s merchants to Defendants, or to any other third party, such conduct constitutes both a breach of the ISO Agreement and tortious interference with Everest’s merchant contracts,” it reads. “Through the course of discovery in this lawsuit, Everest plans to add as additional Defendants, as yet unidentified ISOs, which have been working with Defendants to target Everest’s merchant accounts in violation of their contractual agreements.”
Everest has been vigorously pursuing debt settlement companies. In September, they, along with Yellowstone Capital, filed a lawsuit against eight defendants (later amended to include 1 more) in New York.
Another lawsuit examining similar issues was also filed last year in New York. In Pearl Gamma Funding and Pearl Beta Funding v Creditors Relief, Pearl tacked on a defamation claim in addition to tortious interference. That case is still pending.
Defendants in Forged COJ Case Failed to Respond to The Complaint
January 16, 2018The lawsuit brought by FundKite against defendants alleged to have forged a Confession of Judgment (COJ) is not going so well for the defendants. Last week, FundKite filed a proposed order for a default judgment since none of the defendants ever appeared to defend themselves.
Meanwhile, circumstances surrounding the suspicious notary stamp on the COJ in the case have become a lot more clear. Originally, the merchant asked how a New York notary stamp ended up on the documents he claims are forged when the merchant himself resides in Florida.
According to an affidavit by Jennifer Gately, the notary, she was asked by someone employed by the ISO to sign off on a document for a merchant without the merchant present. She refused. Soon after, her notary stamp was stolen. She not only reported this theft to the National Notary Association, but she also filed a police report.
The relationship between the person working for the ISO and her, is that they both lived at the same address, explaining how the theft would’ve been relatively easy to carry out.
“I have never worked with any of the listed defendants on any matters, including concerning financial transactions,” she declared.
The case is filed under Index Number: 656692/2017 in the New York Supreme Court. You can download the original complaint here.
Stacking Lawsuit Trial Date Set
January 16, 2018The lawsuit between RapidAdvance and Pearl Capital has a trial date, June 25, 2018. RapidAdvance, who filed the complaint in 2015 in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County in Maryland, has sought to recover damages for tortious interference.
Considering that RapidAdvance’s loan to the merchant at hand was only for $31,000, this litigation, which is now more than 2 years-old and scheduled for trial, is likely more about the parties attempting to set a precedent.
The case is Small Business Financial Solutions, LLC v. Pearl Beta Funding, LLC Case No. 411478-V.
Judge Okays Leave to Add Additional Defendants in Kalamata Capital / Biz2Credit Lawsuit
December 12, 2017A three-year-old lawsuit pending in the New York Supreme Court has experienced a flurry of motion practice, according to the docket. The latest order issued by the Honorable Kelly O’Neill Levy granted Kalamata Capital leave to amend the complaint to include both Direct Lending Investments, LLC and Direct Lending Income Fund LP as defendants.
A key claim in this case is the allegation of tortious interference. A previous legal brief on the matter can be read here.
The case can be found in the New York Supreme Court under index number 653749/2014.
.JPG){kind=link}