Business Finance Companies on Inc 5000 List in 2025
August 12, 2025Here’s where small business finance companies rank on the Inc 5000 list for 2025 (and if we’ve missed you, email info@debanked.com):
Ranking | Company | 3-Year % Growth |
15 | Parafin | 9594 |
206 | businessloans.com | 1862 |
669 | Pinnacle Funding | 626 |
831 | SBG Funding | 508 |
1215 | Essential Funding Group | 359 |
1240 | Clara Capital | 352 |
1417 | Backd | 306 |
1705 | Kapitus | 256 |
1719 | Channel | 255 |
1756 | Fundible | 248 |
2027 | 4 Pillar Funding | 214 |
2117 | Biz2Credit | 203 |
2293 | Byzfunder | 187 |
2671 | Critical Financing | 156 |
3081 | Lendzi | 131 |
3226 | eCapital | 124 |
3508 | ApplePie Capital | 111 |
3545 | SellersFi | 109 |
3901 | Splash Advance | 95 |
3973 | Fora Financial | 92 |
3993 | Capital Infusion | 91 |
4076 | Expansion Capital Group | 88 |
4162 | Shore Funding Solutions | 85 |
4206 | Direct Funding Now | 83 |
4712 | ROK Financial | 63 |
LightSpeed Capital Has Over $100M in MCAs on Balance Sheet
August 5, 2025LightSpeed Capital, the MCA division of LightSpeed Commerce, has over $100M in merchant cash advances on its balance sheet, according to the company’s latest quarterly earnings report. The POS company reported that LightSpeed Capital’s revenue grew 34% year-over-year.
The company’s balance-sheet-driven approach has made them relatively conservative and cautious with originations growth. For example, in the preceding quarter, Lightspeed CFO Asha Bakshani said “There is a lot of opportunity. We can move faster if we wanted to. When we look at our peers, for example, they are giving out 1% of their [Gross Transaction Volume] in merchant cash advance. Lightspeed is well below that. 1% of our GTV would be almost $1 billion in merchant cash advance. So when we think about the opportunity, it’s there. It’s just that in this macro, we want to move carefully on a product like Capital. Like I mentioned earlier, our default rates are in the very low single digits, and we want to keep it there.”
Debt Resolution Exec and Factoring SVP Discuss the MCA “Problem”
June 25, 2025Adam Duso of Second Wind Consultants and Curtis Powell of nFusion Capital joined a call with Michael Toglia of ABL Advisor to discuss the problem of dealing with merchant cash advances.
If you were curious to hear a perspective from their points of view, you can watch the interview here.
In related news, nFusion Capital’s COO/CFO Amity Mercado was announced as a new board member of the International Factoring Association (IFA) this week.
FundKite, Aquamark Partner on Watermarking Submission Docs
June 17, 2025As more brokers rush to watermark submission documents to minimize the likelihood of their deals being backdoored, FundKite is codifying the trend into policy by partnering with Aquamark. Aquamark, as readers may recall, was recently spotlighted on deBanked for its defensive watermarking technology which enables brokers to stamp documents in a tamper-resistant manner, marking them as having originated from the broker. If these stamped documents end up in the hands of an unauthorized third party, the watermark reveals their original source. With watermarked submissions on the rise, FundKite will only accept them if they match the originating broker. The company will also encourage brokers to use Aquamark to protect their submissions if they aren’t already doing so.
“At FundKite, we take submissions very seriously and want to ensure that the documents we receive have been originated by the ISO submitting them and were not backdoored, which has been a major issue in the industry,” said Alex Shvarts, CEO of FundKite. “We encourage all our ISO partners to watermark their submissions for this reason. Aquamark provides a seamless and inexpensive process we tested and strongly recommend.”
“This partnership reflects a rapidly growing shift in the industry — brokers are fed up with deal theft, and they’re increasingly aware of how critical compliance will be over the next 12 to 24 months,” said Christina Duncan, Founder of Aquamark. “We’re grateful to partner with Alex at FundKite, who’s stepping up to address these challenges by reducing risk, building trust, and helping preserve the integrity of the space as it evolves.”
Lightspeed: Potential to do up to $1B in Merchant Cash Advances
June 15, 2025Lightspeed may have only done $45 million in MCAs in FY 2025 but the point-of-sale company is continuing to grow that particular lucrative segment of its business conservatively, and possibly far below its full potential.
“There is a lot of opportunity. We can move faster if we wanted to,” said Lightspeed CFO Asha Bakshani during the company’s most recent earnings call. “When we look at our peers, for example, they are giving out 1% of their [Gross Transaction Volume] in merchant cash advance. Lightspeed is well below that. 1% of our GTV would be almost $1 billion in merchant cash advance. So when we think about the opportunity, it’s there. It’s just that in this macro, we want to move carefully on a product like Capital. Like I mentioned earlier, our default rates are in the very low single digits, and we want to keep it there.”
Lightspeed estimates its MCA program will grow by 30% in FY 2026. Part of the reason the company has grown its MCA business so conservatively is that it funds 100% of them on balance sheet.
The company advertises that MCA payments are enabled by either split or ACH.
The Battle Against MCA in Texas
June 12, 2025David Roitblat is the founder and CEO of Better Accounting Solutions, an accounting firm based in New York City, and a leading authority in specialized accounting for merchant cash advance companies.To connect with David or schedule a call about working with Better Accounting Solutions, email david@betteraccountingsolutions.com.
Texas, a state associated with limited government intervention and freedom of business to operate and succeed in a capitalist society, stands at a crossroads.
Governor Greg Abbott has until June 22nd to decide whether to sign House Bill 700 into law—a decision that could fundamentally reshape how small businesses access capital in the Lone Star State. If he signs it, or simply lets the deadline pass without action, this sweeping legislation will take effect on September 1, 2025. The action will potentially cut off vital funding sources for thousands of Texas entrepreneurs, in a direct assault on the merchant cash advance industry that has been a lifeline for the people of his state.
The stakes couldn’t be higher. While supporters frame HB 700 as consumer protection, this bill targets sales-based financing—financial tools that have become lifelines for small businesses shut out of traditional bank lending.
Small business owners know the frustration of walking into a bank and walking out empty-handed all too well. Traditional lenders have tightened their belts, especially for newer businesses, minority-owned enterprises, and companies in industries deemed “risky.” When a restaurant owner needs quick capital to fix a broken freezer, or a contractor requires funds to purchase materials for a big job, they can’t wait weeks for a bank’s approval process. They need solutions now.
That’s where alternatives come in. Revenue-based financing provides capital based on future sales, not credit scores or lengthy financial histories. Yes, they can be more expensive than bank loans—but they’re also available when banks say no.
This financing drives business growth, job creation, and the health of Main Street. When small businesses can access capital quickly, they expand, hire employees, and strengthen their communities.
HB 700 goes far beyond simple disclosure requirements. While transparency is important—and most responsible providers already provide clear terms—this bill creates a regulatory maze that could price many providers out of the Texas market entirely.
The bill imposes sweeping new requirements that will fundamentally change how sales-based financing companies operate in Texas. Companies providing commercial sales-based financing must register with the Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner by December 31, 2026, including both direct providers and brokers, with mandatory annual renewals and fees.
For any financing under $1 million, sales-based financing providers must provide extensive disclosures covering everything from total financing amounts and disbursement details to payment schedules, additional fees, prepayment penalties, and even broker compensation arrangements. The operational restrictions go much deeper, voiding confession of judgment clauses entirely and requiring companies to obtain recipient signatures on all disclosures before finalizing any transaction.
Perhaps most problematic is the prohibition on automatic debiting of recipient accounts unless companies hold a “validly perfected first-priority security interest”—a legal standard that’s nearly impossible to meet in practice and effectively kills the streamlined payment processes that make revenue-based financing work for the funders, and by extension, the merchants.
The Finance Commission of Texas gains broad authority to identify and prohibit “unfair, deceptive, or abusive” practices, though interestingly, they cannot set maximum interest rates or fees. Violations carry steep civil penalties of $10,000 each, and the law applies to any provider offering services to Texas recipients via the Internet, regardless of where the company is physically located. These aren’t minor regulatory adjustments—they represent a complete overhaul that could drive legitimate capital providers out of the Texas market entirely.
This isn’t just bureaucratic red tape. It’s a fundamental misunderstanding of how modern business financing works. Revenue-based financing depends on streamlined payment processes tied to daily sales. Without this mechanism, the entire business model becomes unworkable.
If HB 700 becomes law, the consequences will ripple through Texas’s economy. Small businesses already struggling with inflation, labor shortages, and supply chain disruptions will lose access to flexible financing options. Rural businesses, minority-owned enterprises, and startups will be hit hardest—exactly the businesses Texas should be supporting.
The irony is stark. Texas has built its reputation as a business-friendly state, attracting companies fleeing overregulation in other states. HB 700 threatens to undermine that competitive advantage by making it harder for small businesses to access the capital they need to grow.
The voices of actual small business owners have been largely absent from this debate. Many don’t even know this legislation exists, despite its potential impact on their operations. Those who are aware express frustration that lawmakers are making decisions about their financing options without understanding their real-world needs.
Governor Abbott faces a clear choice. He can sign legislation that will likely drive responsible funders out of Texas, or he can recognize that small businesses need access to diverse financing options.
The goal should be protecting businesses from truly predatory practices while preserving their ability to access capital when traditional banks won’t help. That requires nuanced policy, not broad restrictions that treat all alternative finance providers as predators.
The battle against MCA regulation in Texas isn’t really about merchant cash advances—it’s about whether Texas will remain a place where small businesses can find the capital they need to thrive. Governor Abbott’s decision will determine not just the fate of HB 700, but the future of small business financing in Texas.
The countdown has begun. Texas small businesses are watching and waiting.
Tell Your Merchants to Act on The Texas Legislation
June 5, 2025Unbeknownst to many small businesses in Texas, revenue-based financing will be severely restricted in the state starting September 1, 2025 if the governor permits HB 700 to be finalized into law. For small businesses who might want to have a say on this matter, the Revenue Based Finance Coalition (RBFC) has provided information for merchants to conduct outreach to the appropriate parties. If you have merchants who want to weigh in before it’s too late, please share this link with them.
Govenor Abbott has between now and June 22nd to veto the legislation. If he signs or elects not to sign the bill by that date, the law will take effect on September 1, 2025.
Texas Passes Law Limiting Sales-Based Financing to 1st Positions Only (and more)
May 29, 2025The Texas House of Representatives has adopted the Senate’s controversial Commercial Sales-Based Financing amendment that prohibits a sales-based financing provider from automatically debiting any merchant in the state unless they are in a perfected 1st position. With the governor’s signature it will be law. As previously outlined, Texas had introduced its own commercial financing disclosure bill which included many extra requirements such as broker registration, state regulatory oversight, and now… a prohibition on any sales-based financing (with a particular aim at MCAs) where payments are debited that is not a true 1st position with a perfected security interest. It bears mentioning that 1st position here means 1st position out of any other claim altogether, not just other MCAs.
The passed bill, which is the Senate version on the right hand side of this document, includes the following language:
CERTAIN AUTOMATIC DEBITS PROHIBITED.
A provider or commercial sales-based financing broker may not establish a mechanism for automatically debiting a recipient’s deposit account unless the provider or broker holds a validly perfected security interest in the recipient’s account under Chapter 9, Business & Commerce Code, with a first priority against the claims of all other persons.
While the law specifies sales-based financing, broadly encompassing either a purchase transaction (MCA) or a loan where the payments ebb and flow with sales activity (revenue based finance loan), companies with a special bank relationship are exempt from the law. The exemption applies to: “a bank, out-of-state bank, bank holding company, credit union, federal credit union, out-of-state credit union, or any subsidiary or affiliate of those financial institutions.”
Though the House had until Monday to decide on adopting the Senate’s amendment, the 98 Yeas to the 23 Nays made it a done deal at the very end of yesterday’s legislative session. It now simply awaits the governor’s signature.