Sean Murray


Articles by Sean Murray

rss feed

Puerto Rico Bankers Association Calls Section 1071 Absurd and Unreasonable

June 28, 2017
Article by:

Section 1071, the law that grants the CFPB authority to collect loan application data on minority and women-owned businesses, is under fire, again. This time it’s the Puerto Rico Bankers Association in response to the CFPB’s RFI on the matter. In a letter, the PRBA points out the sheer irony of conducting costly disparate impact studies on minorities in minority-only communities.

An excerpt from their statement:

According to the 2010 US Census Bureau, 99% of the population of Puerto Rico is Hispanic.

[…]

The direct and evident effect of Section 704B of ECOA for the financial institutions in Puerto Rico will inevitably be the collection, recordkeeping and reporting of virtually all commercial loan applications received within the Puerto Rico marketplace, since most of such applicants would be regarded as “Minority Owned Business”, in accordance with Section 704B.

The PRBA believes that this absurd and unreasonable result must not have been intended by Congress when it enacted Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act. The data so collected, maintained and reported will not serve the purposes for with Section 1071 was enacted since, for the reasons set forth above, it will be completely inaccurate and unreliable. The potential complexity and cost of compliance with the minority-owned businesses data collection and reporting requirements of Section 704(B), will impose on our banks an unintended and unreasonable burden.

Other responses to the CFPB’s RFI have so far called Section 1071, “literally impossible to comply with” and a duplicated effort.

Read the PRBA’s full letter here

Dubious Story On Strategic Funding Unfounded

June 22, 2017
Article by:

Strategic FundingA questionable story published by Allen Taylor of Lending Times pushed the boundaries of journalism earlier this week. Citing a single anonymous source, Taylor wrote that an alleged breakdown in negotiations between Strategic Funding Source (SFS) and CAN Capital (CAN) had compounded into more problems for SFS when a burst water main drenched their main office and server room at a time when they supposedly had no disaster backup plan in place.

“Unfortunately, in order to save money, they [SFS] did not have a disaster backup plan in place,” is the quote Lending Times ran with from their anonymous and only source.

Peculiar on its face, especially with no published response from SFS to confirm it, the story was nonetheless rebroadcast by a new blog calling itself SmallBusinessLending.io, who added their own little editorial flair to it in an email they sent out.

“Having cut a few corners to save money, the company [SFS] didn’t have a disaster backup plan in place. Owch,” the email said.

Eager to determine the accuracy of the story, I reached out to SFS personally for comment, whose executives responded with an astonished bewilderment. They invited me over to go see for myself, which I took them up on. deBanked had ranked SFS as one of the largest small business funders of 2016, and their demise (especially in a great flood of some kind) would indeed be newsworthy.

Strategic Funding Source office at 145 W 45th Street in New York, NY
At right, Senior Advisor David Sederholt walks an SFS floor at 145 West 45th Street in NYC

A water main was struck on the 5th floor of Tower 45 at 120 West 45th Street, only one of three buildings in Manhattan that SFS has offices in. Andy Reiser, the company’s CEO, and David Sederholt, a Senior Advisor, gave me a tour of several floors, including the 5th where the incident happened. There is some water damage on lower floors, prompting some employees and executives to reshuffle their workspaces, and necessitating the use of available office space up on the 19th floor. That much is true.

Little, if anything seemed to have been disrupted, however, least of all their servers, which Sederholt maintained is in Amazon’s cloud anyway. They have redundancy built in nonetheless for all types of disasters should something impede New York’s operations, they explained, with Virginia and Texas operations as their fallback.

Just to be sure, I visited their other Manhattan offices at 1501 Broadway and 145 West 45th street, each of which hummed with normal activity.

The company wouldn’t comment on matters regarding CAN. CAN, if you recall, suspended funding operations almost 7 months ago and rumors have surfaced from time to time on industry forums regarding a comeback, but none have been confirmed.

On June 13th, American Banker reported that CAN had laid off an estimated 55 employees in their Kennesaw, GA office.

A message left for Lending Times about their reporting on SFS had not been answered by the time this story went live.

Pearl Capital Secures $15M in Financing From Chatham Capital Management

June 21, 2017
Article by:

pearl capital

Pearl Capital Business Funding, LLC has closed on $15 million in financing from Atlanta-based Chatham Capital Management, according to the company. Pearl is a NY-based small business funder that was acquired in 2015 by Capital Z Partners, a private equity firm.

“We understand that despite personal credit issues, many small business owners have triumphed in building successful businesses,” said Pearl CEO Solomon Lax. “Locked out of the traditional bank financing channels, those small business owners turn to Pearl Capital Business Funding to enable their dreams. By partnering with Chatham, we are able to make those dreams a reality.”

Chatham has invested in other companies such as iPayment, Vitamin Shoppe, DirectTV, QVC, Neiman Marcus, and 5-hour energy, according to their website.

Pearl also secured $20 Million from Arena Investors, LP in July of last year.

Déjà Vu: Some Small Business Funders are Fading Away

June 20, 2017
Article by:

IT’S THE END OF DAYS!!

Or is it?

fading awayApparently I’m old enough to see this happening all over again. A handful of big names in the alternative small business space are faltering and many of you have asked what this means for the industry. It really doesn’t mean anything other than those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.

We already went through this in 2008-2009 when at least half of the funders in the merchant cash advance industry were wiped out over the course of several months. Merit Capital Advance, Fast Capital, First Funds, Summit, and Global Swift Funding were the Goliaths of their time. Those companies going out of business seemed unthinkable in principle and for what that would mean for the industry as a whole. Smaller players disappeared too, names like iFunds, Infinicap, and others for those of you who might remember.

Those companies failed. The industry continued.

While it’s easy to finger the financial crisis as the culprit for their demise, the truth, or at least the truth through the fog of war and days gone by, is a lot more relatable. Funders were undone by their dependence on a single source of capital, sloppy underwriting, defaults, rogue ISOs, a race to hit origination targets, overpaying commissions, misplaced predictions, and even stacking. If any of those things remind you of what’s happening today, well then of course there are companies failing.

One lesson from the past is that you won’t necessarily get a year or two to adjust and figure things out. It will seem like everything is great and then suddenly it’s not. No company is going to sit you down and tell you their 1-2 year going-out-of-business plan to prepare you for change. They probably don’t have any such plan, will fight to avoid it and their end may be just as much a shock to themselves as it is to everyone else.

What we’re learning again this time is that some business models just won’t pan out long term. And some business models that used to work no longer work so much today. Things like stacking are not going away. It’s not illegal and no legal precedent has been established against it. If you’re an ISO though, you may be risking a relationship or breaching your own ISO contract by helping a merchant engage in it. So it’s a slippery slope but one that has permanently disrupted the landscape.

I have heard a lot of complaints from ISOs about the supposed decay of funder loyalty, as in they feel their deals are getting swiped. Another lesson from 2008 is that in times of strain, parties are more likely to look to their contracts for guidance and if the contract says they can take your deal after a certain amount of time and they very much financially need to, they probably will do it. The whole hey, we’re friends, we wouldn’t do that kind of thing goes out the window if survival is at stake and the contract allows for certain actions. That also means that if you’re an ISO who has violated an ISO agreement before and got nothing but a shrug in the past, don’t be surprised if suddenly one day you’re put on notice of a breach and are forced to reckon with the consequences of it.

What failures in the industry may also mean is a return to a semblance of order, a return to a code. 2010-2011 was a refreshing time to be in the business with so much unhealthy competition out of the way even though approval terms were less flexible and there were fewer options to shop around for. By 2013 however, a flood of participants discovering the industry for the first time, believed that they had stumbled upon something brand new and lost were the lessons of yore. Some of them introduced lasting change, like ACH debits over merchant accounts splits. Others just replicated the cavalier tactics that had proved fatal in the previous generation, distorting a happy market equilibrium in the process.

Ultimately, the market will prevail, albeit with some new names and new faces at the top. This is the way of things. It has happened before. It will happen again. Look at the companies rising rather than those that are falling. Whatever they are doing may be the future, whether you agree with how they do business or not.

US Treasury Calls for Section 1071 to Be Repealed

June 19, 2017
Article by:

In a 149-page report prepared for President Trump, the US Treasury has called for the repeal of Section 1071 of Dodd-Frank. Section 1071 is the governing law behind the CFPB’s jump into small business lending data collection. Citing the cost of data collection and anemic small business loan growth since 2008, the Treasury says, “Although financial institutions are not currently required to gather such information [required by the law], many lenders have expressed concern that this requirement will be costly to implement, will directly contribute to higher small business borrowing costs, and reduce access to small business loans.”

Charts from the report

Change in Small Business Lending

“THE PROVISIONS IN THIS SECTION OF DODD-FRANK PERTAINING TO SMALL BUSINESSES SHOULD BE REPEALED TO ENSURE THAT THE INTENDED BENEFITS DO NOT INADVERTENTLY REDUCE THE ABILITY OF SMALL BUSINESSES TO ACCESS CREDIT AT A REASONABLE COST” – US Treasury

Growth in Bank Lending

Bank Loan Growth

The current deadline to reply to the CFPB’s Request For Information is July 14th though industry sources expect the deadline will be pushed back. Of course, if Section 1071 were successfully repealed, the RFI would be moot.

The Choice Act, a bill that just passed the House of Representatives, does indeed repeal Section 1071, but industry sources following the legislation believe the bill will die in the Senate.

Even if a repeal never happens, it is possible that regulations pursuant to Section 1071 may not even go into effect until the early 2020s if similar rulemaking trajectories are to be used as a guide. With payday lending, for example, the CFPB RFI on the matter ended in early 2012 but to-date there still has been no final rule.

You can download the full Treasury Report here.

That Awkward Moment in Alternative Lending When…

June 13, 2017
Article by:

That awkward moment when you apply for a bank charter (::cough:: SoFi ::cough::) and you realize your company’s motto has literally been #dontbank all along…

SoFi Don't Bank

The above is actually from a video they made about how much banks suck.

This is the beginning of a bankless world

A slight fix to their ads:

don't bank sofi

#dontbank meme

sofi bank

lie detector sofi

sofi bank bylaws

futurama sofi

sofi bank list

#dontbank

You can view the full bank charter application of the anti-bank whose slogan was #dontbank, here. You can also read an article about it on TechCrunch.

Another NY Supreme Court Judge Casts Doubt On The MFS – Volunteer Pharmacy Case

June 10, 2017
Article by:

Just as an Orange County, NY judge found in Merchant Funding Services, LLC v. Micromanos Corporation d/b/a Micromanos and Astsumassa Tochisako that a uniquely structured merchant cash advance was not a criminally usurious loan, so too did the Honorable Maria S. Vazquez-Doles on June 8th, court records reveal. Vazquez-Doles, who also presides in Orange County, concurred that the attorney representing defendants in Yellowstone Capital LLC v M N B Waterford LLC d/b/a MAC N’ Brewz! Mac N.Cheez! LLC d/b/a Mac N’Cheez! Somerset and Gary E Sussman, misquoted the contract’s language in their motion papers to suit their argument that the agreement was in fact a loan. In her decision, she referred to defendants’ attempt to twist the words as “incomplete and palpably misleading.”

“The Agreement is not on its face and as a matter of law a criminally usurious loan,” she held.

This is the second judge to opine that the decision in Merchant Funding Services, LLC v. Volunteer Pharmacy Inc. was premised on the opposition palpably misquoting an addendum to the contract in their motion papers. The first was the Honorable Catherine M. Bartlett last month.

The weight of the Volunteer Pharmacy case to a cottage industry of attorneys hoping to argue that merchant cash advances are disguised loans, is rapidly declining. The actual language of the these particular contracts has now twice exonerated the merchant cash advance companies.

The Yellowstone case decided on June 8th is filed under Index Number: EF001264-2017.

Industry CEOs Were Less Confident in Q1

June 6, 2017
Article by:

According to the latest quarterly Bryant Park Capital/deBanked survey of industry CEOs, confidence dropped to the lowest levels since the survey first began in Q4 2015. Specifically, confidence in being able to access capital needed to grow dipped down to 78.7% from 82.7% in the prior quarter. Confidence in the continued success of the Small Business Lending & MCA Industry shrank from 81.9% in Q4 to 73.8% in Q1.

See the trends below:

Industry Confidence Q1 2017

Access to Capital Q1 2017

The survey does not ask participants to offer a reason for their confidence but the drop could probably be partially attributed to the events that occurred at CAN Capital, OnDeck’s struggles, and a general correction that took place at several other competing firms.