Tips
Silicon Valley’s One Punch Knockout
October 4, 2012“This morning I woke up, brushed my teeth, and hopped in my hovercraft to go to the office. As soon as I arrived, I began my routine of playing ping-pong against my co-workers while computers performed the automated tasks I had set for them. Then I went to the gym, came back, and learned that our web portal had generated 12,000 leads, closed 7,000 deals, and funded 5,000 merchants. It was an exhausting day…” — A Senior Account Executive from the year 2013.
We’ve been offering insight on the 2012 invasion of Silicon Valley into the Merchant Cash Advance (MCA) industry. Excuse us, it’s called the “merchant financing industry” now. California technology companies are bringing money, yes, but most importantly, bringing their treasure trove of technologies to companies that were mostly satisfied with the status quo. But are America’s small businesses ready to do business Silicon Valley style or have MCA companies had it right all along, to operate in the way that small business is most comfortable with?
Two weeks ago, California enacted a law that will allow computerized driverless cars to drive on the road. Cars that drive themselves… this is business as usual in parts of California where everyday things such as gasoline, wires, and paper money don’t exist anymore. There, it is believed that clipping coupons from newspapers is something that the Pilgrims did on the Mayflower. There, applying for a small business loan should be as easy as using your brain waves to telepathically connect with a bank’s computer and having the funds instantly transferred to your bank account. There, is a sense that the rest of the country is just like them…. except it’s not.
If you’ve ever had the pleasure of being an MCA underwriter, you know why antiquated funding companies aren’t going to go quietly into the night. We got to speak with one veteran on condition of anonymity. His words:
We had a guy with good credit, processing $15,000 a month in credit card sales, looking for $20,000. He’d been in business for fourteen years and it seemed like a home run but it took seven weeks to close. He didn’t have a printer or a scanner and he had to drive twenty miles to the nearest Fedex/Kinkos every time he wanted to send us something. On his third trip, his ’94 Corolla broke down and we had to wait a few days until he could find a friend’s car to borrow to send the documents.
These situations do not occur every day, but it is evidence that automation will not singlehandedly knock everyone else out with one punch. There is a technology gap in America. Statisticians point out that 78% of Americans use the Internet, but there is a whole generation that doesn’t trust it with their most sensitive information or have the capabilities to use it to its fullest extent. Would a Silicon Valley takeover of the MCA industry alienate them and leave many of America’s small businesses once again without a shoulder to lean on?
Program or be Programmed
The title of this segment here is the title of a book written by Douglas Rushkoff. An article on CNN commented at length about it and its revelations about the digital age. Americans need to learn all the basics when they’re young. Your PHPs are just as important as your ABCs and 123s. CNN interestingly states:
It’s time Americans begin treating computer code the way we do the alphabet or arithmetic. Code is the stuff that makes computer programs work — the list of commands that tells a word processor, a website, a video game, or an airplane navigation system what to do. That’s all software is: lines of code, written by people.
—Just a couple of years ago, I was getting blank stares or worse when I would suggest to colleagues and audiences that they learn code, or else. “Program or be programmed,” became my mantra: If you are not a true user of digital technology, then you are likely being used by digital technology. My suggestion that people learn to program was meant more as a starting point in a bigger argument.
—According to Calacanis, each employee who understands how to code is valued at about $500,000 to $1 million toward the total acquisition price. One million dollars just to get someone who learns code.
Read those last two lines? Each employee that understands how to code is worth up to $1 million. Are they seriously teaching people in school that Microsoft Office proficiency is a leg up in the business world?
College graduates that know more than one language have an edge over people that don’t. But speaking Chinese, Spanish, or Arabic won’t get you as far as JavaScript. According to IT World, JavaScript is the most highly ranked programming language in the world as measured by its use and popularity. Learn French and you’ll really enjoy a vacation in Paris. Learn PHP, Python, or Ruby and you just might become the King of France.
Am I Already a Dinosaur?
No! Don’t let those 10 year olds with a software empire get you down. Anyone can learn and you need not spend $30,000 a year on college tuition to do it. Codecademy can help complete beginners learn code for free. Get real good at it and you may earn yourself a $50,000 salary increase.
One Punch
Silicon Valley with their exotic computer languages and cars that drive themselves may present a challenge to the MCA industry, but many firms will be able to hang on for a long, long time. Some people still pay by check at the grocery store and yes, many business owners would rather not use online banking, no matter how safe they’re told it is. But there will come a time when being bilingual means being able to write Java and Perl. Oh there will come a time when driving twenty miles to Kinkos in a car that one must drive themselves to fax a document that will never again exist on paper, will be an experience we confuse with the Pilgrims trip on the Mayflower.
Everyone should at least take some basic lessons on self-defense. Silicon Valley is coming out fighting. They might not knock you out, but it couldn’t hurt to have a white belt in JavaScript. Anything to keep you in the ring just a little bit longer.
< ?php echo "- Merchant Processing Resource"; ? > đ
https://debanked.com
Article condensed 10/8/12
Why You Need FundersCloud – An Independent Review
August 29, 2012Picture this:
You get up in the morning, take a shower, brush your teeth, and hop on to your computer. 73 new e-mails are waiting in your inbox. Ugh! Some of them are saying “Hey buddy, I got this deal that I think you might want to co-fund. Give me a call later and I’ll try to give you a breakdown.” Half of the time when you call these guys back, they’re busy, have already found a participant, or the deal is way too risky for you to be interested in. Fortunately, you don’t really have to deal with this hassle ever since you joined FundersCloud. You close Outlook, log in to the Cloud and check out the menu of fresh deals that have been posted to the site. You read them aloud to yourself as you scroll down the list. “15k in monthly credit card sales, 40k gross, 720 credit, in business 3 years, ooo.. and it’s a restaurant! $10,000 advance for $13,700… I like… I like… oh and $7,000 has already been raised.” You click ‘Bid’, type in $3,000, and click ‘Bid’ again to finalize. That’s it. You’re done. Once the agent closes the deal, your $3,000 is automatically withdrawn, along with the amounts from the other participants to fund the merchant the $10,000. Satisfied, you walk into the kitchen to make toast…
And that’s what FundersCloud has done. Whether you are an independent agent, an ISO, or a funder, deal syndication is now as easy as:
FundersCloud is not the competition. They’re the turbo boost button to the marketplace that already exists. This Cloud doesn’t threaten or replace your existing cloud, system, database, or CRM but rather complements it, integrates with it, and adds even more value to what you already have.
FundersCloud makes funding quicker, smarter, more efficient, and incredibly transparent. This isn’t a paid advertisement. In fact we spent a few weeks on the phone with the FundersCloud team to come up with our own independent assessment. “How does this work? Who reviews this data? How can people trust you?” and so on… We’re actually thankful their team is still accepting our phone calls after our barrage of questioning and requests for details.
The reason we believe FundersCloud is the future of syndication is because it allows people to continue syndicating with funders and people they already trust.
Huh?!
Allow us to explain using a fictional example:
Funder 123 encourages friends, agents, and funders to participate in funding certain deals. ISO ABC likes to syndicate some of those deals but not all of them. So the owners of ISO ABC wait and hope that Funder 123 will call them sometimes with a deal that they like. Sometimes they hate the deal. Sometimes they like it. Other times, they play so much phone tag that they miss out on the opportunity. The process takes phone calls, emails, and time, time, time. Not to mention that Funder 123 may make several of these calls to other people to join in on the participation as well.
In a perfect world, ISO ABC would automatically be notified that Funder 123 has approved a deal and is seeking participants. The key factors like credit score, processing volume, batch frequency, gross sales, and other pertinent information would be immediately available. The ISO could then click a button if they wanted to participate and the rest of the process would all be automated. This perfect world exists because this is the FundersCloud model.
Ohhh yea! And it gets better
An agent is tired of submitting his/her deals to 5 funders at once, hoping that one of them will approve it. The funders are tired of the agent doing that too. Because the agent is forced to maximize the odds of approval, there is really no alternative solution than to continue operating this way. FundersCloud resolves the mess.
Hypothetical Agent DEF uploads their deal to the Cloud and selects one company from the vast array of Deal Controllers to verify and underwrite the file. Deal Controllers are typically existing funding providers, companies that have the ability to pay commissions, collect funds back from the merchants, and track the activity. Perhaps Agent DEF’s deal does not accept credit cards but does more than $10,000 a month in gross revenue, something that a lot of companies like to look at now. So Agent DEF selects a funder as the Deal Controller in the Cloud. The underwriters at that funder are then able to access the deal through the Cloud and underwrite it. If the file meets their standards, they Verify it. The funder can then choose to fund 100% of the deal themselves or pledge to fund anywhere from 1% to 99% of it and put the remaining percentage of the approved funding terms up for auction on the Cloud.
The key details of the deal are then immediately posted and viewable to all members of the Cloud. Thousands of people will now see that a funder has verified this deal and is willing to fund part of it. If you trust that funder’s judgment, have participated with them before, or just love funding anything you can get your hands on, you can opt to participate in the deal with them. You’re not flying blind because the credit score, processing volume, gross sales volume, time in business, type of business, and batch count are all there for you to see. Cloud members can’t steal deals because any information that could be used to identify the merchant is not visible.
So why is this better? You’re only submitting your deal to one Deal Controller (funder) through the Cloud, which then allows thousands of agents, ISOs, and funders to participate if the Deal Controller chooses to fund none of it or less than 100% of it. With this kind of system, why the hell would any agent continue to send out their deal to multiple funders and then wait a week to hear back from all of them? The merchant’s credit would get hit 5 times, one of those funders might steal the deal for themselves, and at the end of the day, only 5 people are looking at it. Wouldn’t you rather let one funder Verify your deal and then give thousands of companies and agents the chance to fund it? Seriously…
If the Deal Controller is verifying the deal and can see the full file, what’s to stop them from stealing it?
A contract, a zero-tolerance policy, and a reminder that it’s up to you to choose your Deal Controller. If there are two choices in the Cloud to Verify your deal and one is XYZ Funder and the other is someone you know very well, you can pick the company you like. Many other people may trust XYZ Funder but if you don’t know who they are, then you need not select them. Besides, if a Deal Controller is caught stealing a deal from the agent through the Cloud, they will be banned. The industry is competitive and even though there are many safeguards already in place, FundersCloud will not tolerate anyone who tries to pervert the system.
Is this process difficult for the agents?
We must admit that when it was all first explained to us, some of the terms went over our head. That’s mainly due to the fact that for all the evolution within the Merchant Cash Advance industry, many things are still kind of old-fashioned. For all the systems, databases, and clouds floating around out there now, too much time is spent e-mailing, calling, and meeting up for lunch to discuss the details that we must then go back and enter into these systems, databases, and clouds. Once you sit down and play around in FundersCloud for yourself, you’ll kick yourself for not developing this on your own or curse the Merchant Cash Advance gods for not having introduced this into your life years ago. This process is just as easy for the agent as it is for the other roles.
Agent uploads deal -> Agent chooses Deal Controller -> Deal Controller Verifies Deal -> Cloud members pledge money by placing bids -> funding contract is automatically generated and made available for download to the agent -> Agent closes the deal and uploads signed contract to the
Cloud -> The Cloud automatically pulls the funds from the pledged participants and transfers them to the Deal Controller -> Deal Controller funds the merchant and is responsible for managing the account -> Agent gets paid the commission by the Deal Controller -> Agent makes toast
The deal’s performance is then made available to the involved parties through the Cloud in real time. And since the Deal Controller is obligated to manage the deal on the Agent’s behalf, the Agent retains full control of the deal on renewals. Similarly, participants are given the option to join in on renewals or new participants can be brought in altogether. Many things can happen, but all of them lead to more funding, faster funding, and a system that’s more transparent for all the parties involved.
Your own internal cloud, system, database, or CRM is probably doing wonders for data management within your company. So why resist technology in other areas? FundersCloud isn’t a concept, it’s live. Deals are already being posted, funded, and tracked. Which means, even if you’re skeptical or have a thousand more questions, you need to sign up (it’s FREE) and see this for yourself. We’ve kept tabs on a lot of events in the Merchant Cash Advance industry, and this is one of those moments where we need to pause, join the Cloud, and make toast. Because the toughest part of getting a deal funded in the future, will be deciding if you want White, Rye, or Whole Wheat afterwards.
The FundersCloud Website
– deBanked
https://debanked.com
Note: This article was originally drafted in late April but was on hold while FundersCloud made some key upgrades. We apologize if we left out any of the new cool features.
The Bubble That Wasn’t
August 17, 2012“The smaller the loan, the more likely a lender will deny it. The denial rate for applications for small loans (less than $100,000) was more than twice as high as it was for bigger loans.”
– CNNMoney 8/16/12
In early 2009, a very wise friend of mine gave me a bit of advice. As an ex-stock broker who made his fortune in the 80s, he’d seen his fair share of bubbles. And so he bestowed upon me his wisdom that the Merchant Cash Advance (MCA) industry’s days were numbered. “It’s got 6-8 months left of life in it and then it’ll go away. Everyone’s in freakout mode right now but things will go right back to the way they were and banks will push you right out of a job,” he lectured me. My expression didn’t change, for he wasn’t the first one to sing me this cautionary tale. He continued on, “You’re a nice guy so I suggest in the next few months, you go out and get into another line of work. You can always look at this experience as a wild ride but MCA is a fringe industry borne out of the financial crisis.” I thanked him for looking out for me and went home that night to mull over what he and a few others had been saying.
No one wants to believe their thriving business is part of a bubble that will inevitably burst. But at the same time, no one wants to later on be perceived as that naive fool that couldn’t see an obvious end coming either. And while the career itself seemed honorable and sustainable (helping small businesses get financing), there were a lot of pivotal moments along the way that made me think for a second that at any day I could be told to pack up my stuff and go home because there was suddenly no more demand for MCA.
I am reminded of the time when a Craigslist Ad was answered by over 500 recently laid off mortgage brokers and underwriters. Some had literally been hired to underwrite mortgages, only to be told days later that their division was closing down. Similarly, there were hot shots from the payday loan industry who stopped by to learn what our business was all about. These people looked like they had been punched in the gut and told stories of major success followed by unforeseen ruin as states legislated them out of business overnight. And still others had the mentality that MCA was a get rich quick scheme and went on to run their own funding companies or brokerage offices into the ground within a matter of months. They cursed the MCA gods and the bubble they believed they were a victim of, ignoring the reality that they had poorly managed themselves into oblivion.
As the 6 to 8 month timeline for destruction expired and the light shone on those still standing, I realized I had made the right choice by sticking it out. MCA was not a progeny of the financial meltdown. Heck, the product itself had already been around since the late 1990s and had gained significant popularity around 2005 when other players began entering the market. It also had none of the trademark signs of a bubble. If financing businesses was a bubble, there would be no such thing as banks today. Business financing has been around for literally thousands of years. MCA firms just catered to the ones that banks ignored and by 2008 that included nearly every small business in the country. One could argue that the growth rate of MCA would eventually slow down, supporting the claim with the same wisdom I had heard nearly a year before, that everything would return to “normal.”
Today’s world is anything but the world of yesterday. The unemployment rate in July was 8.3% and according to a survey reported by CNN, “[Today], the option most often sought by businesses — opening a new credit line — face[s] the lowest approval rate at 13%” Banks never did return to their old ways, nor does it seem likely that they will any time soon. Those that doubted MCA’s longevity in 2009, including those who left the industry altogether back then in fear, did not foresee the many roads of evolution that would allow it to thrive.
Years ago, an MCA was easily defined as a purchase of future sales that would ideally be completed in 6 to 9 months. Virtually every provider offered identical terms and costs, which stymied competition and eventually created stereotypes that would come to haunt the image of MCA for quite some time. For a while, America had a hard time envisioning MCA as anything but a 1.38 factor rate that was available to those that fit a certain credit criteria and processed a minimum amount of credit card sales monthly. So imagine the shock some small business owners felt when approved by RapidAdvance, a veteran MCA firm, for a ::gasp:: small business loan. A loan?! could it be? Yes, MCA has been semantically broadened to include many forms of short term lending. And then there’s Florida based Merchant Cash Group that became famous with their Fast Funding program, a financing option for businesses that fell outside the box for traditional MCAs. Some companies don’t even require businesses to accept credit cards as a form of payment. “Credit card sales? Who cares how much they’re doing in credit card sales?!” Would you ever imagine an MCA rep making such a statement in 2009?
MCA is still widely considered to be tied to credit card processing and it doesn’t ever need to officially evolve away from that. Withholding a percentage of sales directly from a payment processor is what initially allowed the many business owners that were horrible at making monthly payments suddenly eligible to receive capital. But for all the changes that have been applied to the financing product itself, something has changed with the companies offering it as well.
Competitors used to be ultra secretive about their practices. An MCA firm could be underwriting an application that another MCA firm funded the day before. Sure, the merchant wasn’t supposed to hop around and do this with more than one company at a time, but the other firm wouldn’t even confirm if they funded them if you asked. One of the great failures of the past was the lack of cooperation amongst the players in the industry. An ‘every man for himself’ mentality hurt more than it helped in a business that was struggling to create its identity in the mainstream world of finance. The North American Merchant Advance Association (NAMAA) sought to correct that through data sharing and the promotion of common standards. Some of the major members have years of experience under their belt including Merchant Cash and Capital, Strategic Funding Source, RapidAdvance, and Merchant Cash Group. These firms have been around the block and back. “MCA bubble? What bubble?,” they’ll say with 100% confidence in their tone.
So why a boring history lesson on MCA today? It’s only fitting on the day that CNN declared the bursting of the social media bubble, that I re-visit a decision I made 3 years ago. “I’m just looking out for you kid,” a mentor once told me. Bad advice for sure. This year, I am noticing many people that left MCA years ago are coming back. After so much time has passed, they are STILL getting in early on something that’s going to be huge, rather than coming back to ‘manage the decay’ (did I just take a swipe at Obama?!). VCs are having a field day trying to get in on it. Accel Partners recently forged an equity deal with Capital Access Network with the ultimate goal of what I’m guessing is to one day go public.
The only things bubbly in MCA these days are the excited account reps, underwriters, and support staff that are working to get America’s small businesses humming again. Some have taken to wearing their FUNDED pants 7 days a week. I know I have practically worn mine out.
I’m always struck now by the college grads that ask me if this business is sustainable. Their anxious parents are worried sick that their babies are going to be caught up in some bubble and be out of a job 6 to 8 months from now. To this I offer a few words of wisdom. “Providing small businesses with capital isn’t going away anytime soon. Sure, the product might evolve and the economy will change, but the fundamental demand for short term financing is here to stay. You seem like nice parents so I’d hate to see your kid get involved in some other industry at the end of its life cycle. He or She is getting in early on something big, something long lasting, something that has become a permanent staple of the American financial system.” Good advice for sure.
By: Sean Murray
Founder of Merchant Processing Resource (https://debanked.com)
Began career in the MCA industry in August, 2006
P.S.
The FUNDED pants do exist and were created by Next Level Funding in early 2010.
Remember âThinking Out of the Box?â
August 10, 2012
Remember when âthinking out of the boxâ was all the craze when it came to finding solutions and building business? Today most of us disregard thinking out of the box and much prefer being âcreativeâ and âinnovative.â Weâre much more sophisticated in our approach. Thinking out of the box appears to be a metaphor that has outlived its use. In todayâs business environment if you want to succeed youâre better off concentrating on coming up with creative, innovative solutions and products.
Not so fast say American and Chinese researchers who conducted some pretty interesting research into the psychology of creativity.
Here are a few examples of what they found out:
- An experiment was conducted where people were placed either in a five foot by five foot âboxâ or seated outside the box. The people outside the box were found to perform at higher levels when taking tests that required creative thinking.
- In another experiment it was found that being able to walk freely about stimulated more creative and effective thinking and problem solving than those who were instructed to walk in a straight line.
- In a particularly interesting experiment people were asked to put two things together. The group who received instructions to act out the metaphor of putting âtwo and two togetherâ were more successful in developing different ways to approach the problem successfully.
Taking the Research Out of the Lab and into the Real World
It might appear that this research has very little, even nothing, to contribute to the growth and development of your small business. So letâs take a second look at the findings as they relate to your business and the workplace:
The first experiment found that most people work better in an open environment. How many of us and those who work for us do that work in square offices or cubicles? Not everyone would be comfortable working in a completely open space, but doing our best to provide work spaces that evoke creativity and innovative thinking would likely be good for business.
In the second experiment people were found to be better able to solve problems as well as think creatively when not required to walk in a straight line. Most small businesses owners see productive workers as workers sitting at their desk or station. For example, it could be that an employee might think better when solving a problem when speaking to a client or customer on the phone if standing and allowed to move about. This increase in innovative thinking may not apply to just physically walking in a straight line. Small business owners might want to consider examining policies and procedures to see if allowing employees to âwalk more freelyâ might mean more effective and productive employees.
The last experiment where people were asked to put things together poses more of a challenge to apply in the real world your small business operates in. Perhaps the best way to look at this finding is to view to approaching what needs to be done in different ways to be an effective means to find the best way to do things. After all, what better metaphor is there for solving a problem correctly other than âput two and two together?â
The last thing these experiments demonstrate is that perhaps weâre wrong to believe âthinking out of the boxâ is a method to improve business thatâs seen better days. As a matter-of-fact, thinking out of the box appears to be another term for creativity and innovation.
Guest Authored by Annie:
– Merchant Processing Resource
https://debanked.com
It Might Be You
August 8, 2012You are innocently eating your bologna sandwich in the lunchroom when some of your fellow elementary school friends start to giggle. You giggle a little too just because you usually all laugh at things together, even though you’re not exactly sure what the joke was. “Damn,” you think to yourself. “I got all caught up in my bologna sandwich and I missed something.” Soon others begin to laugh. You laugh nervously with them, but take a couple quick glances around the room to try and locate the source of the humor. You spot nothing, but realize the chuckles are spreading like wildfire. Some people are looking at you as if they are suspicious that you might be the only one that doesn’t GET it. So instead you double down on your laughter as if to prove you’re enjoying the joke more than they are. “I’m enjoying whatever it is we’re all laughing at more than you are!,” you say under your breath. This only makes the crowd more raucous and by now everyone is starting to point in your direction.
“Ohhhhh crapppp…”
And then you find out it is you. There you are, sitting in the cafeteria, munching on a bologna sandwich with a grade school level obscenity drawn on the back of your shirt. You don’t know who drew it or when it happened, but you quickly learn it was done in red marker, particularly the kind from the 1980s that smelled like cherry, caused dizziness, and made your nose bleed after 15 seconds. There’s always somebody getting picked on, you just never thought it would be you.
Smells Sooooo Gooddddd
“Ohhhhh crapppp…”
It might be you. Every year or so, the MCA industry welcomes in a couple new big players. There’s always one that funds more, pays more, bends more, and brags more as they quickly cut into the marketshare that established funders have had for years. Suddenly they’re the hottest thing in town, that is until about 6 months later when they start telling their “loyal” broker shops to stop sending in new deals for a while. As the newbie’s joyride comes to an end, the established funders roll their eyes and continue on the way they always have, responsibly.
We’re not here to point anyone out or to suggest that brokers purposely send bad paper to an inexperienced funder. It’s just easy to spot the amateurs. Sadly, most people laugh at them behind the scenes until the funder calls it quits, completely unaware that they’ve been wearing a “kick me” sign on their back for months.
This could be an uncomfortable topic for some, but this rapid rise and fall scenario plays out across many industries. If your business is less than two years old, ask yourself this: Is your success a result of awesomeness or do you smell a tinge of red cherry marker?
—————
Does anyone know what the truth is anymore? These contradictory articles were both published yesterday by reputable news media outlets:
Banks Keep Lending Standards Tight For Small Firms
Fed Says Banks Ease Standards On Business, Consumer Loans
Is affirmative action coming to a funder near you?
Dodd-Frank’s small business lending time bomb
Growth in the usage of MCAs (selling future sales for cash upfront) is taking a huge chunk of market share away from traditional lenders.
Some crusty old reporters remain clueless as to why fewer and fewer businesses are turning to their banks for loans. Professor Scott Shane in BusinessWeek fumbled through his recent 700 word article in which he makes several unconvincing arguments for credit cards as being the new holy grail for business owners. Ultimately, he concedes that the decrease in small loans to businesses might simply be a benign statistical anomaly. This guy is a professor??!! Borrow, Borrow, Loan, Loan, Loan. Some people still can’t imagine a world where leveraging can happen without a borrower and a lender.
—————
Have you ever tried to peg down what exactly is happening in the credit markets? The National Federation of Independent Business has already done a lot of the work for you. A few clues:
- Small-business owners are increasingly employing personal rather than business cards for business purposes
- Fifty-seven (57) percent of small employers attempted to obtain credit from a financial institution in the last 12 months, a nine percentage point increase from 2010 with the demand for lines and cards each rising more than one-third. The demand for line renewals and loans were flat. More attempts resulted in more rejections rather than more small-business owners obtaining credit
- Poorer credit risks were more likely to try to borrow in 2011 than better credit risks, other factors equal. A number of financial factors, such as credit score, differentiate the two groups. Men and owners of larger small businesses were also more likely than their counter-parts to try to borrow
Download the full 76 page NFIB January 2012 report
—————
Some MCA underwriters hate when merchants state they aim to use the funding proceeds for “cash flow” as if its unspecific nature was code for betting on the horses. In the traditional lending world, businesses have been offering that up as a purpose for decades. From the NFIB Report:
– Merchant Processing Resource
https://debanked.com
The Funders of Summer
August 2, 2012What’s new? Who funded? What happened? Merchant Processing Resource will try to give you a glimpse into the Merchant Cash Advance (MCA) universe:
We all know salespeople love to fund, but underwriters?!! This banner hangs on the wall of the underwriting department at mid-sized MCA firm, Rapid Capital Funding:
Holy Moses Batman! $10 Million in a month?! Yellowstone Capital is reporting a new personal monthly funding record of $10,245,000.
There has been an influx of really creative instructional/promotional videos about MCA lately. Cartoons are really “in” right now:
PayPal white labeled a Merchant Cash Advance program in the U.K.
Will the mega banks be next?
It feels like 2006 all over again says First Annapolis Consulting in a recent article:
This seems to be the same bullish sentiment that surrounded the industry in 2006, when there was a constant influx of new MCA providers into the industry and what appeared to be unlimited financial sources. What might be different now is the experience accumulated in the industry during the recession. In the last few years, and as a result of the mounting losses that the industry suffered during the economic crisis, MCA players have implemented more conservative risk management practices and procedures.
Underwriters industrywide are also reporting that stacking, splitting, double funding, and fake statements are on the rise. It certainly brings back some nostalgia for veterans and not the good kind. A screenshot of a current ad on craigslist that is directed at bad apple merchants:
A new chapter opened for Merchant Cash Advance (This is soooo last month but a great read if you missed it).
http://greensheet.com/emagazine.php?issue_number=120602&story_id=3088
Is the loan shortage a banking problem or a merchant problem? Ami Kassar makes the case in his New York Times column.
“Where are the leads? I need the leads. Can you tell me where the leads are?” We literally get asked daily where to get leads from. We recommend:
http://SmallBusinessLoanRates.com
http://meridianleads.com
By the way… for every company that says cold calling doesn’t work, there’s a company getting rich doing just that. Same goes for SEO, mailers, e-mail blasts, PPC, and so. Marketing is an art form. Just because it doesn’t work for you, doesn’t mean it doesn’t work period. Keep doing what you’re doing. Too many ISOs/agents/marketing directors abandon campaigns after 30-60 days. Practice makes perfect!
Have you abandoned social media? We ask this question: What looks worse to a prospect?
Not having a business twitter account or having one but failing to tweet at all in the last 8 months?
Not having a business blog or having one but failing to add any new blog posts in over a year?
We didn’t spend much time researching hard data but we would surmise that freshness is a psychological component to a prospect’s shopping experience. If a business blogged regularly on their site up until May, 2011 and then stopped, might a merchant think the entire business itself is abandoned or gone? Is a facebook fan page with 1 post from 8 months ago a positive or negative selling point? WE SAY: If you build it, maintain it. Nothing brings down your presence on the Internet like abandonment. We understand that smaller companies might not have the manpower, time, or creative energy to write informative articles or engage people through social networking, especially when it’s hard to measure the results and value it creates. Consider the value you might actually be losing by projecting to the world that you have given up. It’s like operating a store with a sign out front that says “THIS BUILDING HAS BEEN CONDEMNED” even though you are actually open for business. If WE stopped posting articles for a year, would you still come back several times a month?
Here are two examples of MCA firms that keep it FRESH!:
http://unitedcapitalsource.com/blog/
http://takechargecapital.com/category/blog/
Don’t you just love MCA? We do! Visit our site again soon.
– Merchant Processing Resource
https://debanked.com
Smart Small Business Owners Have After Sales Strategies
July 27, 2012
We all want to be successful small business owners. And that means being a Smart Small Business Owner. Part of being a Smart Small Business Owner (SBO) is understanding the importance of designing and implementing effective after sales strategies.
SBOâs know that it really isnât about attracting customers. Keeping that pipeline of potential customers flowing is really just a basic cost of doing business. You can be pretty darn successful when it comes to attracting customers. You can be pretty darn successful converting those prospects into making a purchase. But whatâs really going to grow your business isnât only attracting and converting prospects into customers â itâs building strategies into your business model that pull another couple rabbits out of the customer hat: repeat and referral customers.
The term âAfter Sales Strategiesâ should not be confused with selling extended service or product subscription programs. Not that these arenât something to consider as they both represent excellent additional revenue streams. Itâs great to sell a customer a jar of face cream â it is even better to sell them a pre-paid jar of face cream for a year. Itâs wonderful to conduct a home inspection for a client before they purchase a home â itâs even better to sell them a pre-paid seasonal inspection service.
However, thatâs not the kind of âafter sales strategiesâ weâre talking about. What weâre going to address here are a category of after sales strategies that do some pretty important things when it comes to growing your small business:
⢠Improve Customer Satisfaction
⢠Improve Customer Retention
⢠Increase Positive Word of Mouth
It Pays to Act in The Best Interest of Your Customer
But first we need to talk a little bit about exactly what type of âAfter Sales Strategiesâ weâre talking about here. Simply put, these are strategies which, from the customerâs perspective, are âfreebies.â Theyâve already pulled out their wallets and handed over their cash and then receive a pleasant surprise: the business theyâve already handed their money over to does something in their best interest without trying to sell them something else in the process.
Hereâs a really simple example of how powerful after sales strategies can be.
You decide to try out a Greek restaurant youâve never been to before on date night with your spouse. You order your meals and theyâre pretty good. No complaints. The server is friendly and attentive. The dĂŠcor is nice. Youâre in the process of signing your check. Youâre not overly wowed, but you might come back. Maybe, if you happen to be hungry and in the area at the same time.
And then you get a nice little surprise. Your server approaches your table and places two small cups of Greek coffee accompanied by two small, yet perfect squares of baklava.
You say, âWe didnât order desert, Iâve already signed off on the check.â
Your server says, âOh, this is just a little treat with our compliments to top off your meal. I can put it in a box if youâre ready to go.â
You donât even like baklava (but your wife does) and youâre not sure how youâre going to feel about Greek coffee. But there is one thing youâre sure of now â youâll be coming back. There were those rolled grape things on the menu youâve always wanted to try. When you show up at work on Monday you tell your friends about the great Greek restaurant you took the wife to over the weekend. Hearing about the free dessert, a few of them ask for directions. On Friday, a group from the office runs over to catch lunch.
That coffee and dessert was a simple, low cost, yet effective, after sales service strategy. As a result you:
⢠Were more satisfied
⢠Planned on making another purchase
⢠Told others about your great experience
All three of the above are certainly responses youâd like from your customers after theyâve bought from you. Which leads us to a great question all you SBOâs out there should be asking yourselves right now:
âWhat are some simple, low cost, yet effective after sales service strategies I can put into place?â
Article By: Annie
https://debanked.com
1 Application Turned into Multiple Credit Pulls
July 30, 2010
Many merchant cash advance applicants have filled out a single form only to later find out their credit was pulled multiple times. This is common amongst brokers. Many brokers will take the application and then submit it to multiple Cash Advance Providers for review. They do this to increase the applicantâs chance of approval and ultimately come out with the best deal.
There is a flip side to this strategy that every applicant should be aware of. Credit inquiries affect FICO score. Though multiple pulls in a very short span of time wonât be as damaging as if they were spread out (Credit Agencies realize that people shop for credit and thus your score isnât lowered as much), the actual record of the inquiry will remain on the report for 2 years.
If there are upwards of 4 pulls or more, this can have negative implications. Many Cash Advance Providers view inquiries from competitors as a bad sign and there are instances where applicants will be declined simply because theyâve âover shopped.â
If an applicant was credit worthy to begin with and they were planning on obtaining a mortgage or auto loan in the near future, this needs to be seriously considered. That mortgage or car loan may no longer be available because of too many credit inquiries.
Advice: Anyone applying for a merchant cash advance should discuss with their account representative before hand to find out exactly how many times their credit will be pulled and what entities will be pulling it. Authorizing an entity to pull credit does not grant anyone unlimited usage for an indefinite amount of time.
If any applicant feels their credit was pulled more times than was authorized or by unauthorized entities, they should contact the entity responsible. The entity is required by law to prove they had authorization to pull credit. If they made the inquiry in error, they are required to send you a letter stating just that. This letter can then be used to have the inquiry removed when contesting with the Credit Agency.
If the entity does not respond within 30 days, they can be in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
