The Merchant’s Paying, The Bank Statements Were Fraudulent: Talking With MoneyThumb

Small funders trying to tackle fraudulent submissions with no tools stand almost no chance in today’s environment. A recent survey conducted by both MoneyThumb and deBanked, for example, found that small funders experience fraud in 11.8% of applications on average, more than double the rate of larger funders. In the past, detecting altered documents such as bank statements, was best managed by experienced underwriters, but now with technology and AI in the palm of everyone’s hands, today’s fraud is often imperceptible to the naked eye.

“If you go back to 2020 when we created this [Thumbprint technology], I would say about 80 to 85% of bank statements that were fraudulent we would look at and say, ‘there’s the fraud,'” said Ryan Campbell, CEO of MoneyThumb. “Now it’s sub-5% that I can identify just with the human eye, and so technology has just absolutely created an environment where people can create fraud in a way that they never could.”

Thumbprint is MoneyThumb’s patented fraud detection tool. It can bolt into any industry CRM. Historically, an immediate default was the first clue that a fraudulent app had slipped through the cracks, but even accounts in good standing may not be what they seem.

“[What] we’ve seen is people take a smaller loan, then a slightly larger loan, and then the big one, the third loan—default,” said Campbell.

Bank statements that are otherwise in perfect order may have had their transaction descriptions edited so that loan deposits from third parties look like revenue or round-trip payments with the owner’s personal account are reclassified to look like daily sales. For fraud like this, the numbers are real, the statements are real, but what’s revenue and not revenue is obfuscated. And when the deal is approved based on the misleading metrics the scammers can actually stick around to pay for a while to convince the underwriters that they’re worthy of more.

“We’ve run quite a few portfolio analyses for our funders, and so we’ll review all of the statements that they have, all of the funded deals that they’ve done, and many are surprised to find out that they actually have fraudulent paying accounts on their books,” Campbell said.

Since the rate of fraudulent applications is so material, catching the fraud as early as possible is paramount. This saves cost on underwriting, reduces time spent on deals that won’t move forward, and spares referral partners the pain of a deal getting killed at the finish line for an uncurable problem.

“As soon as it comes in, rather than wasting time on ‘are we collecting this? Are we extending offers?’ because think, it’s not just the fraud,” said Campbell. “Even if you can catch the fraud at the very end, somehow it’s not the catching part, it’s the fact that your staff is working a fraudulent deal for some matter of days. And Thumbprint just says, ‘get it out. It’s gone, done,’ and right at the beginning of the process.”

Sean Murray is the President and Chief Editor of deBanked and the founder of the Broker Fair Conference. Connect with me on LinkedIn or follow me on twitter. You can view all future deBanked events here.