Archive for 2017

deBanked Golf Outing 2017 Photos

August 29, 2017
Article by:

Thanks to Marine Park Golf Course in Brooklyn, NY for having us! And thanks to all who came and sponsored!

20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_36
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_10
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_41
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_51
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_65
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_70
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_78
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_81
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_104
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_113
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_119
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_122
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_135
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_137
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_144
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_152
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_154
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_159
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_183
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_187
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_193
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_204
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_209
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_213
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_218
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_221
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_228
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_241
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_255
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_260
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_274
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_282
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_308
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_345
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_349
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_351
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_359
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_361
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_363
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_367
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_371
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_376
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_411
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_414
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_415
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_434
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_438
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_441
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_459
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_463
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_471
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_507
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_515
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_523
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_546
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_549
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_557
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_570
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_573
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_582
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_598
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_604
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_612
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_636
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_647
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_680
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_684
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_690
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_695
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_696
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_699
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_713
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_720
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_729
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_758
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_764
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_770
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_776
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_793
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_810
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_813
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_822
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_842
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_849
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_858
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_866
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_869
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_876
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_884
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_889
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_896
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_903
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_912
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_918
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_926
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_930
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_933
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_943
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_949
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_947
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_955
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_959
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_964
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_980
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_968
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_987
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_992
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_998
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1004
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1032
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1036
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1038
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1043
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1049
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1054
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1060
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1064
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1070
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1075
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1079
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1087
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1092
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1101
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1117
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1121
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1126
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1133
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1144
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1150
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1158
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1166
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1175
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1181
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1185
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1195
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1198
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1204
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1209
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1215
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1231
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1247
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1254
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1259
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1264
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1288
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1298
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1305
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1312
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1322
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1331
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1339
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1353
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1366
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1374
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1396
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1400
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1421
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1430
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1434
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1440
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1444
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1448
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1453
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1464
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1473
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1475
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1480
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1482
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1486
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1509
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1517
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1525
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1527
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1530
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1536
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1539
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1546
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1556
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1569
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1572
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1578
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1609
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1616
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1625
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1628
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1636
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1633
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1644
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1651
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1663
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1677
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1690
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1733
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1740
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1743
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1747
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1750
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1753
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1767
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1774
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1787
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1812
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1807
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1827
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1828
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1833
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1846
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1862
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1849
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1867
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1875
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1890
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1901
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1879
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1913
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1906
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1922
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1919
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1926
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1937
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1941
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1946
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1957
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1963
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1969
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_1996
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2030
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2007
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2022
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2034
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2053
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2059
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2066
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2076
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2102
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2083
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2099
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2123
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2118
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2133
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2129
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2162
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2139
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2170
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2173
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2180
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2177
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2185
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2191
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2192
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2195
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2204
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2208
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2233
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2239
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2247
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2255
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2261
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2277
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2267
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2283
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2290
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2292
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2299
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2321
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2318
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2355
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2332
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2363
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2360
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2375
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2365
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2404
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2397
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2414
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2422
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2424
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2430
20170828_DEBANKED_GOLF_2453

Ford, MCA Funders Take Pages from Tech-Based Underwriting

August 29, 2017
Article by:

FordAlternative lending fever has spilled over into the auto sector, evidenced by the financing arm of automaker Ford’s decision to move beyond FICO and deeper into machine learning for credit decisions. Ford is moving toward alternative lending strategies in an attempt to capture a wider swath of borrowers, including those with “limited credit histories,” and bolster auto sales.

Ford’s decision comes on the heels of a study with fintech play ZestFinance, the results of which favor a machine-learning based approach to credit decisions.

Ford’s decision comes on the heels of a study between Ford Credit and fintech play ZestFinance, the results of which favor a machine-learning based approach to credit decisions.

“There is absolutely no change in Ford Credit’s risk appetite. Ford Credit is maintaining the consistent and prudent standards it has applied for years. This enhanced ability to look at data will help us more appropriately place applicants along the full spectrum of the risk scale. The result will be some that some people may appear on that scale who did not before, and some applications that are approved today might not be approved in the future. The risk appetite remains the same,” Ford Credit spokesperson Margaret Mellott told deBanked.

Until now, there has been no aspect of machine learning in Ford Credit’s underwriting process.

“The study showed improved predictive power, which holds promise for more approvals … and even stronger business performance, including lower credit losses,” according to Joy Falotico, Ford Credit chairman and CEO, in a press release.

Ford is targeting consumers with a lack of credit history, especially the millennial generation.

Tech-Driven Underwriting

While Ford embraces tech-driven underwriting, this style is already knit into the fabric of the MCA and online lending communities.

To name a few, Upstart takes a machine learning approach. FundKite developed algorithmic-based underwriting. UpLyft’s underwriting process has an automated component to it.

technologyAlex Shvarts, CTO and director of business development at FundKite, a balance-sheet based funder, said the company has been writing algorithms since the early days. Now the tech- and algorithm-driven funder wants to expand into small business lending in Q1 2018.

“We’re building our technology to the point that by Q1 next year, we will get into automated loan products. Our technology will be able to underwrite loan products within seconds. We have a lot of data we put together, which allows us to price deals and make offers relatively quickly,” he said.

By a lot of data, Shvarts is referring to hundreds of data points that are used to measure merchant performance. FundKite, which has a default rate of far less than 10 percent, takes the data, reworks and combines it, leading to a fast result.

“Besides the data points we look at the merchant from a collections point of view. If this person or business runs into trouble, could they go out of business or would they be okay?” he said.

That’s where the human element to the underwriting process comes in.

Human Element

While FundKite relies on algorithm-driven underwriting, the funder is not running an online app yet. There is still a need for human participation surrounding data input, information that is then verified by machines.

“The human element is entering the information correctly, and the machine spits out predetermined pricing based on the business data points and industry,” said Shvarts, adding that FundKite views that information in the context of micro-trends in the industry as well as the overall market environment.

“We know that during certain seasons some merchants perform worse than others. The numbers say the merchant should get this, but we dig a little deeper and say no, this merchant can’t handle this much of an advance and repayment along those lines. The final touches are done by humans. Our technology is advanced so that we are able to get to that point a lot faster and more accurately,” Shvarts said.

Second Opinion

Michael Massa, CEO and founder of Uplyft Capital, points to a hybrid approach in the company’s credit underwriting, referring to the automated scoring portion of Uplyft’s underwriting model as a second opinion. “We believe there must be a hybrid of human and automated technology,” said Massa.

“THEY’RE LIKE THE PAYPHONE AND WE’RE THE IPHONE. THEY’RE YELLOW CAB AND WE’RE UBER”


Uplyft relies on a proprietary scoring model. The model includes an automated function that attaches a unique rating to the small business based on certain features in the prospective borrower’s profile, such as a home-based versus business location and the number of years the company has been in business, to name a couple.

“It’s only as second opinion for our underwriters, really,” he said, adding that cash flow and affordability are major drivers of the credit decision. “In most cases we price at max affordability for the client while protecting them from overleveraging their accounts, allowing us to provide real help and establish merchant loyalty.”

old payphoneSecond opinion or not the automated function is part of what makes Uplyft a fintech play, setting the funder apart from the banks. “They’re like the payphone and we’re the iPhone. They’re yellow cab and we’re Uber,” said Massa, adding better yet, “we’re Lyft.”

Uplyft is in the process of developing a trio of portals designed for merchants, sales partners and investors to be released shortly. “We are API-ing that now into our CRM,” said Massa.

Merchants can access the portal to apply for funding while sales partners use it to submit files and view a status. Investors can track their participation via the portal. The new portals will be available on the website and through a mobile app that Uplyft is in the final stages of developing.

Uplyft also recently inked an exclusive partnership with an undisclosed software company allowing merchants to link their bank account to the application, capturing six months of actual PDF bank statements in the process.

“It can help us with the initial credit decision and when we’re conducting final verifications. We get the actual bank statement. It’s a legitimate bank statement, not a rendition,” said Massa.

Fintech & Auto Finance

As for the auto industry, don’t be surprised to hear about further collaboration between the automakers and the fintech market. “Financial technology is key … as fintech can contribute to an even more seamless and better personalized vehicle financing experience for the consumer,” according to the Ford press release.

The deBanked Golf Outing 2017 Was a Success

August 28, 2017
Article by:

debanked flagsThanks to everyone that attended deBanked’s first ever industry golf outing at Marine Park Golf Course in Brooklyn, NY. And thank you to all the sponsors who helped make it a success!

A PHOTO ALBUM IS NOW LIVE

deBanked Golf Outing Display

Official photos from the event should be available soon. In the meantime, follow us on Instagram to see them when they come out.



P.S. The inaugural conference for MCA and business loan brokers is COMING SOON. Visit http://brokerfair.org to receive updates on Broker Fair 2018.

CFPB Sanctioned By Federal Judge After Engaging in Funny Business During Discovery

August 26, 2017
Article by:

federal court rulingWhen the CFPB was asked to support their claims in a brutal lawsuit they had brought against several payment processors, they balked and stonewalled. Eventually, the judge had enough.

On Friday, US District Judge Richard W. Story granted sanctions against the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) for misconduct in discovery and dismissed their case against several payment processors entirely. The CFPB had accused defendants Global Payments, Pathfinder, Frontline and EMS of providing substantial assistance to deceptive conduct carried out by debt collectors.

During discovery, the CFPB attempted to block their own representatives from being deposed in any capacity. The Court disagreed and ordered the depositions to proceed. Rather than comply, the CFPB asked for a protective order to block questioning on topics relevant to their claims. The court mostly denied it, ordering that the defendants were entitled to question the CFPB about the factual underpinnings of its allegations against them.

Apparently determined to undermine the process further, the CFPB produced a witness for a deposition who relied almost entirely on “memory aids,” which in one case was a 200+ page document that the witness merely read aloud verbatim when asked questions.

In a Court conference call conducted in April, defendants complained that the CFPB’s “memory aids” were merely lengthy prepared scripts.

And this was not really a memory aid. This was a script. The witness simply read answers. He did not sort of use it as a refresher of his memory. And frequently the witness would not answer the question asked. But you would ask the witness for the factual basis for something, especially outside Global’s knowledge, and he would read, in one instance for an hour, about things that had nothing to do with Global’s knowledge.

The tactics continued throughout, according to the defendants.

[…] I could be wrong on this Your Honor, but it’s quite possible that in the seven hours yesterday there was no human touch; everything was read. And when anything was asked that would be, well, what facts do you have to support that, it was either met with objection, work product, don’t answer; or the witness would just read lengthy narratives, often that were nonresponsive, that sometimes went as long as 45 minutes and often an hour.

Incredulous that the CFPB refused to answer questions at all costs, the judge ordered sanctions against the CFPB and dismissed the case on the basis that they had failed to produce a knowledgeable witness, made improper objections during depositions, and willfully violated the Court’s repeated instructions.

“In light of the CFPB’s pattern of conduct in this case, the Court is not optimistic that reopening the depositions would be fruitful,” the judge said.

The case is Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Universal Debt Solutions, LLC, et al. in the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, Action 1:115-CV-859-RWS.

Read the full decision here.

Was Section 1071 of Dodd-Frank a Massive Mistake?

August 23, 2017
Article by:

Did Congress make a huge mistake by thinking small business loans were easily commoditized?

Pursuant to Section 1071 of Dodd-Frank, the CFPB is planning to collect data from companies engaged in small business finance in order to potentially screen for discrimination against women and minorities. Before deciding how exactly they’re going to do that, they’ve asked the public for comment, and the public… isn’t showing the law much love. Below are some excerpts of the nearly 300 responses already submitted.

We can tell all the stories we want, and hold all the hearings imaginable, and there is still no way to disguise the fact that implementing a HMDA-like reporting requirement will add cost, complexity, and rigidity to our amazingly customized lending

– Alan Gay

A loan priced properly for the risk may be acceptable for one institution and not acceptable to another. For example a client requests funds to open their second doughnut shop in town. One bank declines the loan because they do not specialize in food service business per lending policy and the banks appetite for risk. Another bank would consider the loan, however after reviewing the current competition decides that the market is saturated and the loan is too risky based on the three competitors within five miles. The third bank is willing to loan the money based on the cash flow of the owner and her husband, but will not take into account the expected cash flow from the business, and will require the collateral to include the primary residence of the client. The fourth bank is an SBA lender and proposes the client use the SBA program to mitigate the risk for the bank. The fifth bank declines the loan due to cash flows. They will not consider the revenues from the new location, because it is considered a start-up business. As I understand it the CFPB will collect the data from all five banks to determine “Fair Lending” similar to the consumer lending program. I find this problematic on many levels: I believe in the scenario presented all the lenders were fair. The data is redundant and will not show the result of credit search on the commercial loan request or accurate results.

– Doug Mitchell

Creating additional documentation and regulation only makes those in Congress and the CFPB feel better without truly adding benefit to our community and it’s businesses.

– Joseph Williams

COLLECTING AND AGGREGATING THIS INFORMATION WOULD BE A BURDEN THAT WOULD REQUIRE ADDITIONAL STAFF AND NOT CHANGE OUR HISTORY AND BUSINESS MANDATE OF SERVING OUR SMALL TOWN BUSINESSES.

– Dee Baertsch

As a community banker in rural Ohio I strongly urge the repeal of Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act. The addition of another report will be counterproductive to lending to small businesses.

– Chuck Dixon

Commercial lending is a completely different animal from consumer lending, and has so many different aspects to consider. While a consumer loan is typically viewed from and ability and intent to pay by reviewing a consumer credit score and debt to income calculation, a commercial loan is viewed from not only current earnings but also projected earnings, the economic conditions surrounding the specific business/industry, competitiveness in the market, and the speed of obsolescence of the business’ products and services. It is so much more than pulling a credit report and getting the last two pay stubs.

– Brian Smith

The Race and Sex questions should be eliminated from all loans.

– David Ludwig

Our bank in particular will be unduly burdened by small business lending data collection.

– Casey D. Lewis, CRCM, First Bank & Trust

This new requirement will place a large burden on our small bank and staff as more time will be spent on data collection and reporting rather than giving the value added service to our actual customers. It also may increase the cost of credit to our borrowers in order to offset the increased compliance cost to comply.

– Anita Drentlaw

These regulation proposed by the CFPB will only act to hamper and restrict our ability to continue meet the credit need of our communities and will not provide any meaningful benefit to anyone.

– Jim Goetz

Adding new requirements to collect and report data related to these loans much like HMDA diverts time of our limited staff away from serving our customer needs and expends resources that do not help our community.

– James Milroy

The last thing I need is to spend even more of my time collecting data similar to the HMDA data we collect on other loans. It is a timely, costly and inefficient use of our resources which could be better utilized for spending more time with potential and current customers and lowering their interest rates. Very few businesses are the same which would lead to misrepresentation and baseless fair lending complaints.

– Daniel Mueller

By making our jobs harder, you are making it harder for small businesses to thrive.

– Joy Blum

I have seen first hand the negative effects of the HMDA collection and reporting to our bank. The increased work for our small bank has driven up our costs and is making it harder for us to compete. In addition to the negative impact on our bank mortgage customers pay a cost and as more and more community banks decide they can no longer provide these services the community will be left with fewer options.

– Jeff Southcott

Stop all the paper work to get a commercial loan. Enough is Enough!

– Jeff Spitzack

We are a small $65 Million dollar bank with limited personnel now being asked to police another segment of our customer base. We do not have the resources to carry out more regulatory burden.

– Girard J. Hoel, Chairman, The Miners National Bank of Eveleth

Commercial lending cannot be “commoditized” in the way that consumer lending can, nor can it be subject to simplified, rigid analysis which may generate baseless fair lending complaints.

– Steve Worrell

We are so heavily burdened with keeping up with all the changing regulations and requirements, it would be very burdensome for not only our bank, but many other community banks. There has to be a way to ensure the end results that you are looking to achieve without making it so hard on Community Banks. We feel that we have to really analyze if it is cost prohibitive to actually make the loan – and how does that help the small businesses?

– Margi Fleming

We would never decline a profit making loan because of the race or sex of the applicant. You would be appalled to know how little attention borrowers pay to the dozens of pages of disclosures required by regulation. Over disclosure is no disclosure.

– Douglas Krogh

Community banks simply do not have numbers on our side, either in manpower or funding, to seamlessly and efficiently absorb the vast and sweeping regulatory changes.

– Cheryl Hiller, 1st National Bank of Scotia

The new data collection will add additional staff at our institution. This salary will be passed on in the form of origination fees or increased rates to our small business customers. This is not fair to them, but with the increased regulatory demands by the CFPB on small business lending if this is adopted will increase their borrowing cost.

– Russell Laffitte

The burden of data collection and reporting would in effect end up costing our customers more to get a loan.

– Shannon Fuller

This tracking will be onerous on a small bank that stays competitive by maintaining a small staff like ours

– Jim Legare

Section 1071 will have a chilling effect on lenders’ ability to price for risk. This, in addition to the expense of data collection and reporting, may impact community banks’ ability to provide affordable commercial lending products and curb access to small business credit, an engine of local economic growth and job creation.

– Freeman Park

Please make every effort to prevent the added burden to small business lending and community bank processes by repealing Section 1071 of the Dodd Frank Act.

– Julie Goll

You can read and track all the responses HERE.

Why BFS Capital’s Glazer Is Passing the Torch

August 22, 2017
Article by:
Marc Glazer
Above: Marc Glazer, former CEO/current chairman, BFS Capital

Marc Glazer co-founded BFS Capital in the early 2000s and has remained at the helm all this time – until now. Glazer has passed the torch over to Michael Marrache, effective last week. He isn’t going too far, as the former chief executive will remain chairman of the board working alongside Marrache on the next chapter for the MCA and small business lending company. Meanwhile the executive pair points to a future not only where there is sustainability but where there is growth.

“We’ve obviously grown the company year after year over the last 15 years, and as with every other type of business and industry there were ebbs and flows. Over the last couple of years with a significant amount of challenges going on, we as a company decided we want to continue to grow but we want to grow in a way that benefits the company from a profitability standpoint as well as serves our customers,” said Glazer.

In April 2017, BFS Capital surpassed $1.5 billion in financings since inception. The company expects to fund more than $300 million in new financings in this calendar year.

“We’ll increase our reliance on algorithmic solutions, transparency in the ISO and customer experience and we will increase the number of financing solutions. Culture is significant for us and we will continue to build on the legacy Marc created,” said Marrache.

“I WOULD SAY WE ARE GOING TO CONTINUE FUNDING SMALL BUSINESSES AND FUND MORE OF THEM THIS YEAR THAN WE DID LAST YEAR”


Marrache takes the reigns at a time when the industry is at a crossroads that will leave some alt lenders in the dust while other rise to the occasion.

“The stories that were challenging in 2016 look good in 2017,” said Marrache, pointing to OnDeck’s forthcoming profitability, Kabbage’s lofty valuation, CAN Capital’s return to funding, PayPal’s acquisition of Swift Financial and Prosper looking good.

“We think alternative and non-bank lending are in a good place. And yes, some of the folks that are no longer operating in this space were overextended or may have exhibited irrational behavior for pricing or customer acquisition costs. We think what we’re witnessing is the normal lifecycle of the industry. There were lots of participants earlier. Now to participate the industry must show a bit more control and sophistication. If you execute well, the tomorrows will be better than 2016,” said Marrache.

And according to Glazer, because of the changes in the business environment over the last couple of years, it’s going to require a different skillset to take BFS Capital to the next level.

“There are clear differences between starting a company, growing a company and becoming a billion-dollar small business financing platform. We’ve needed to evolve at each stage and now again with Michael’s leadership,” he said.

Michael Marrache
Above: Michael Marrache, CEO, BFS Capital

For Glazer, Marrache was almost always the succession plan.

“To be fair, hiring Michael four years ago, maybe succession planning was in the back of my mind somewhat. But as our relationship developed and as he was COO for three-plus years and then president, it became apparent that Michael’s skill set, passion, desire and how he looked at culture were all similar to myself. Let’s grow, but let’s watch our numbers. Make sure we treat people fairly. And for the businesses we are financing — provide thoughtful capital to help them versus creating problems for them,” said Glazer.

More Funding

BFS Capital’s business model is comprised both of MCAs and small business loans. Alternative funding company CAN Capital does both MCAs and loans and had to pause lending until recently. For BFS, however, it’s all systems go. And that means unequivocally continuing to fund small businesses.

“Absolutely, yes. And there’s no quizzicality in mind. I would say we are going to continue funding small businesses and fund more of them this year than we did last year. And we will fund even more the year after. So absolutely,” Marrache said.

BFS Capital sells through both ISOs and directly to merchants, the former of which is where most originations derive. “There are a number of solutions we are putting together to benefit that network,” said Marrache, adding he doesn’t believe algorithmic solutions will replace underwriters.

“WE SPENT A LOT OF EFFORT IN OUR [IPO] FILING. BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, THE MARKET FOR THE SPACE HAD SOFTENED”


“We have a strong legacy of customer underwriting. We believe lower level transactions can be significantly more automated. Above a certain level and certain amounts of origination, we think algorithms and data solutions at that point are a facilitator, not a replacement of our underwriting,” Marrache said.

The Legacy

There was a time when BFS Capital’s growth plans included debuting in the public markets. Those plans have since been sidelined amid a chilly investor reception for alternative lender stocks.

“We spent a lot of effort in our filing,” said Glazer. “But at the end of the day, the market for the space had softened. Going forward I think it’s really going to be a question of what the markets look like and what makes sense for our company. We will evaluate that as the situation warrants.”

IPO or not, it appears Glazer’s legacy is still being written.

“I co-founded the company 15-plus years ago. Before finance and accounting, at heart, I’m an entrepreneur. That’s what I do, what I enjoy. I love starting companies, having the vision and creating things,” he said.

As chairman of the board and a major stakeholder, Glazer will continue to be active in BFS Capital.

Journalist Barred From Being a Director of a UK Firm

August 21, 2017
Article by:

TIME OUTGeorge Popescu, owner of Lending Times, and the winner of the 2017 LendIt Awards for best journalist coverage, has been banned from acting as a company director in the UK for 12 years, according to the government’s Insolvency Service. The ban stems from his tenure as a director of a company called Boston Prime.

George Alex Popescu (“Mr Popescu”) breached his fiduciary duties to act in the best interest of Boston Prime Limited (“Boston Prime”) and/or failed to ensure that both Boston Prime, as the regulated firm, and him individually, as the approved person, complied with the Financial Conduct Authority (“the FCA”) rules and guidance.

$6.2 million was transferred out of the company to a company named FXDD. Boston Prime’s receiver is presently suing FXDD seeking the return of the funds to the company. Proceedings are ongoing. Mr. Popescu is not under investigation and there are no legal proceedings at this time against Mr. Popescu.

Meanwhile in the US, Popescu has raised millions of dollars for his latest company, Lampix, by conducting an initial coin offering for Pix tokens. Lampix reports having raised 52921.88 ETH to-date, currently valued at more than $17 million.

A month ago, the SEC issued a warning about these kinds of offerings.

“Recently promoters have been selling virtual coins or tokens in ICOs. Purchasers may use fiat currency (e.g., U.S. dollars) or virtual currencies to buy these virtual coins or tokens. Promoters may tell purchasers that the capital raised from the sales will be used to fund development of a digital platform, software, or other projects and that the virtual tokens or coins may be used to access the platform, use the software, or otherwise participate in the project. Some promoters and initial sellers may lead buyers of the virtual coins or tokens to expect a return on their investment or to participate in a share of the returns provided by the project. After they are issued, the virtual coins or tokens may be resold to others in a secondary market on virtual currency exchanges or other platforms.

Depending on the facts and circumstances of each individual [Initial Coin Offering] ICO, the virtual coins or tokens that are offered or sold may be securities. If they are securities, the offer and sale of these virtual coins or tokens in an ICO are subject to the federal securities laws.”

Lampix is not licensed to sell securities and they claim their tokens are not securities.

Tech Banks: Will Fintech Dethrone Traditional Banking?

August 20, 2017
Article by:

This story appeared in deBanked’s Jul/Aug 2017 magazine issue. To receive copies in print, SUBSCRIBE FREE

On Halloween, 2014, a largely unknown, Boston-based financial institution, First Trade Union Bank, embraced high-technology, went paperless, and officially adopted a new name: Radius Bank.

Will Fintech Dethrone Traditional Banking?In reinventing itself, Radius did more than dump its dowdy moniker. It shuttered five of its six branches, re-staffed its operations with a tech-savvy team, instituted “anytime/anywhere” banking services, and offered customers free access to cash via a nationwide ATM network. And it teamed up with a fistful of financial technology companies to offer an impressive array of online lending and investment products.

Today, the bank’s management boasts that, using their personal mobile phones, some 2,700 people per week are opening up checking accounts, funneling $3 million in consumer deposits into the bank’s virtual vault. That’s a stark contrast from a decade ago when the financial institution was being rocked by the financial crisis and “we couldn’t get anybody to walk into our branches,” says Radius’s chief executive, Mike Butler.

“We tried to leave that old bank behind,” he says. “We’re a virtual retail bank now, an efficiently run organization that offers high levels of customer service and Amazon-like solutions.”

Radius Bank is not alone. At a moment when there is much discussion — and hand-wringing — over the future of seemingly outmoded, highly regulated community banks, a coterie of small but nimble banks is exploiting technology and punching above its weight. Almost overnight, this cohort is combining the skill and hard-won experience of veteran bankers with the lightning-fast, extraordinary power afforded by the Internet and technological advances. As a result, these small and modest-sized institutions are redefining how banking is done.

In addition to Radius Bank, independent banks winning recognition for their bold, innovative – and profitable — exploitation of technology, include: Live Oak Bank in Wilmington, N.C., which adroitly parlays technology to become the No. 2 lender to business and agricultural borrowers backed by the U.S. Small Business Administration; Darien Rowayton Bank in Darien, Conn., which is making a name for itself with coast-to-coast, online refinancing of student loans; and Cross River Bank in Fort Lee, N.J., which does back-end work for a passel of fintech marketplace lenders.

“THESE ARE COMPANIES THAT UNDERSTAND THE VALUE OF A BANK CHARTER”


Interestingly, there’s not much overlap. Each of the banks goes its own way. But what all the banks have in common is that each has struck out on its own, each hitting upon a technological formula for success, each experiencing superior growth.

“These are companies that understand the value of a bank charter,” says Charles Wendel, president of Financial Institutions Consulting in Miami. “They have to work under the watchful eyes of state and federal regulators. But their cost of funds is low and they can offer more attractive rates. Because they’re less likely (than nonbank fintechs) to disappear, run out of money, or get sold,” the bank expert adds, “they also have the image of stability with customers.”

These modest-sized banks are emerging as not only pacesetters for the banking industry. Along with making common cause with the fintechs — which had promised to disrupt the banking industry – they’re even beating the fintechs at their own game.

Cary Whaley
Above: Cary Whaley, First VP, ICBA

“Classically, community banks have looked to technology partners to provide technological innovation,” says Cary Whaley, first vice-president for payment and technology policy at the Independent Community Bankers of America, a Washington, D.C.-based trade group representing a broad swath of the country’s 5,800 Main Street banks. “They still do. You’re seeing more partnerships. But now you also see community banks building innovative products and services outside of that relationship. You see forward-thinking banks developing their own technology to support big ideas like marketplace lending, distributed ledger technology, and emerging payments technology.”

With its extraordinary skill at exploiting technology, Live Oak Bank – which trades on the Nasdaq and is the only public company encountered in the cohort — has become a Wall Street darling. “While several banks have adopted an online-only model, and nearly all banks are shifting more and more delivery through online channels, Live Oak was built from the ground up as a technology-based bank,” Aaron Deer, a San Francisco-based research analyst at Sandler O’Neill Partners, wrote in a recent investment note.

Driving the success of Live Oak, which operates out of a single branch in the North Carolina seacoast town and has only been in business for a decade, is the explosive growth in its SBA lending, the bank’s “core strategy,” Deer notes. Last year, Live Oak lent out $709.5 million in SBA loans in increments of up to $5 million, the federal agency reports, making it the country’s No. 2 SBA lender. It trailed only megabank Wells Fargo Bank, the third largest bank in the U.S. with $1.5 trillion in assets, which made $838.93 million in SBA-backed loans last year.

As its SBA lending has taken off, Live Oak, which qualifies as a “preferred lender” with the federal agency, boasts assets that have nearly tripled to $1.4 billion in 2016, up from $567 million two years earlier. Those are flabbergastingly fantastic growth numbers. But just as incongruously — by nipping at the heels of Wells Fargo — Live Oak has been challenging a bank more than a thousand times its asset size for dominance in SBA lending.

And, interestingly, the bank is able to book those outsized amounts of SBA loans while lending to only 15 industries out of 1,100 approved by the government agency, slightly more than 1% of the universe. That’s up from 13 industries in 2015, and Live Oak is adding two to four additional industries yearly for its SBA loan portfolio, Deer reports. Included among the industries to which the bank made an average SBA loan of $1.29 million last year: Agriculture and poultry, family entertainment, funeral services, medical and dental, self-storage, veterinary, and wine and craft-beverage.

“WHEN YOU SPECIALIZE IN SOMETHING, YOU BECOME EFFICIENT”


The bank has a team of financing specialists dedicated to each of the designated industries. Among Live Oak’s current SBA borrowers are Martin Self Storage in Summerville, S.C.; Utah Turkey Farms in Circleville, Utah; Pinballz Arcade, Austin, Tex.; and Council Brewery Company in San Diego. Steve Smits, chief credit officer at the bank, told NerdWallet: “When you specialize in something, you become efficient. Because we do it every day and we have professionals and specialists, we tend to be more responsive and quicker.”

The heady combination of technological sophistication and banking expertise has allowed the lender to slash its loan-origination time to 45 days, about half the three-month industry average for SBA loans. To speed up loan sourcing and generation, the bank developed its own in-house technology, which led to the formation of the Wilmington-based technology company nCino, which was spun off to shareholders in 2014.

Live Oak did not return calls to discuss its lending strategies, but in SEC filings bank management declared: “The technology-based platform that is pivotal to our success is dependent on the use of the nCino bank operating system” which relies on Force.com’s cloud-computing infrastructure platform, a product of Salesforce.com.

Natalia Moose, a public relations manager at nCino told deBanked in an e-mail interview: “We work with Live Oak Bank, in addition to more than 150 other financial institutions in multiple countries with assets ranging from $200 million to $2 trillion, including nine of the top 30 U.S. banks. nCino was started by bankers at Live Oak Bank who found the logistics of shuffling paperwork among loan stakeholders to be unwieldy, inefficient and time-consuming.

Above Video: The nCino community

“nCino’s bank operating system,” Moose adds, “leverages the power and security of the Salesforce platform to deliver an end-to-end banking solution. The bank operating system empowers bank employees and leaders with true insight into the bank, combining CRM (customer relationship management), deposit account opening, loan origination, workflow, enterprise content management, digital engagement portal, and instant, real-time reporting on a single secure, cloud-based platform.”

Live Oak, meanwhile, is not resting on its technological laurels. According to Deer’s report, the bank’s parent company, Live Oak Bancshares, has formed a subsidiary to inject venture capital into fintech companies. It’s already taken a small equity stake in Payrails and Finxact, “the latter of which is developing a completely new core processor to compete against the old legacy systems used by most banks,” the Sandler O’Neill analyst writes. “Quite simply,” he asserts elsewhere in his report, “the company is far beyond any other bank we cover in its technical capabilities and the growth outlook remains outstanding.”

Darien Rowayton Bank - Via Google StreetviewFive hundred and thirty-three miles due north along the Atlantic coast in southeastern Connecticut, Darien Rowayton Bank is also experiencing tremendous success as a lender using a home-grown technology platform. State-chartered by the Connecticut Department of Banking and regulated as well by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., the $600 million-asset bank is winning attention in banking circles for its online student-loan refinancing.

A few years ago, DRB, as it is known, was looking to go beyond mortgage and commercial lending — “the bread and butter for most community banks,” bank president Robert Kettenmann explained to deBanked in a telephone interview – and was somewhat at a loss. The bank considered but then rejected the credit card business. Finally, DRB struck paydirt refinancing student loans. “Our chairman really seized on the opportunity,” Kettenmann says, adding: “It’s a $35 billion market.”

Thanks to the National Bank Act, it’s able to operate in all 50 states. As a regulated commercial bank with a strong deposit base, DRB can also offer low rates well below any state’s usury prohibitions.

What is most striking about DRB’s program is its nationwide targeting of upwardly mobile, affluent young professionals. According to a PowerPoint presentation obtained by deBanked, all of the bank’s super-prime borrowers, who are mainly in the 28-34 age bracket, have a college degree and a whopping 93% have graduate degrees. Average income is $194,000.

Rising PhoenixForty-eight percent of those refinancing student loans with DRB are doctors or dentists and another 22 percent are pharmacists, nurses or medical employees; only about 20% are paying off their law degrees or MBAs. The heavy concentration of refinancing in the medical field reduces economic risk in an economic downturn. Forty-three percent of the borrowers are home-owners, the rest are renters – and prime candidates for an online, DRB-financed mortgage.

(Once known as “yuppies” today this cohort is “known by the acronym ‘HENRY,’” remarks Cornelius Hurley, a Boston University banking professor and executive director of the Online Lending Institute, explaining the initials stand for “High Earners Not Rich Yet.”)

The Connecticut bank partnered with a third-party on-line vendor, Campus Door, when it commenced making student loans in 2013. In the fall of 2016, however, DRB built out its own, proprietary loan-origination system, Kettenmann reports, emphasizing that CampusDoor had been an excellent partner but that the bank wanted to exercise end-to-end control over the process. DRB employs a seven-pronged, “omni-channel” marketing approach that includes interactive marketing, affinity partnerships, digital/online advertising, direct mail, mass-media advertising, and public relations/brand awareness campaigns.

DRB’s online enrollment provides “pre-approved rates” in less than two minutes with final approval on rates in 24-48 hours. Refinancers can complete the online application at their own speed. Through May, 2017, DRB had made $2.48 billion in refinancing to 20,000 student-loan borrowers, with only ten defaults, five of which were attributed to deaths or “terminal illness.”

On Yelp! the bank has received a batch of reviews ranging from very favorable, five-star (“I had a truly wonderful experience”) to one-star (“awful” and “truly a nightmare”). Many fault the application process as laborious, describing it as “time-consuming.” But for those who have succeeded, like the reviewer who counseled “patience,” the result can be “the lowest rate with DRB…my loan payments went down $100 a month.”

Cross River BankJust about an hour’s drive south and taking its name from its proximity to New York city just over the George Washington Bridge is New Jersey-based, state-chartered Cross River Bank, which has a reputation as a partner-in-arms to fintech companies. “We’re both users and producers of technology,” declares Gilles Gade, the bank’s chief executive.

The bank provides “back-end” and infrastructure support to 17 marketplace lenders that offer a suite of lending products including personal loans, mortgages and home-equity loans. Following loan origination by a fintech company – Marlette Funding, Affirm, Upstart, loanDepot, SoFi, and Quicken Loan, among other partners — Cross River does the actual underwriting. Last year, Gade reports, the bank underwrote 1.9 million loans valued at $4-4.5 billion, about 10% of which Cross River kept on its books. The bulk of the loans are sold “back to the marketplace lenders” or to a third party. “We’ve created a high-velocity automated system,” he says.

Gade is manifestly unapologetic about the bank’s role in assisting fintechs in their competition with the banking establishment. “We’re a banking infrastructure services provider for those who want to disrupt the banking system,” he says. “Consumers expect a lot better than they’ve been getting from traditional banking services.”

Radius BankBack in Boston, Radius Bank’s chief executive reports that forging partnerships with fintechs to provide the full panoply of online banking services was no easy proposition. In its mating ritual, Radius not only had to determine that a fintech company’s offerings were sound and that it had the right characteristics – most especially “a long-term, sustainable business model” – but that its corporate culture meshed comfortably with Radius’s.

After meeting with as many as 500 fintechs and after a fair amount of trial and error, Radius formed partnerships with LevelUp, which enables customers to make mobile payments; with online lender Prosper, for refinancing consumer debt and “credit rehabilitation”; with SmarterBucks, for refinancing student loans; and with online investment firm Aspiration Partners – which allows investors to name their own fees and markets itself to a predominately middle-class audience as the firm “with a conscience.”

Radius employs advertising on social media websites and employs “psychographics” to appeal to “anyone who is zealous about using technology, not necessarily millennials,” Butler says. The data show that 65% of adults in the U.S. would prefer to use a traditional bank and have face-to-face interactions with a teller, he notes, leaving the remaining 35% as Radius’s target audience.

Christopher Tremont, executive vice-president for virtual banking, told deBanked that a typical Radius customer is 42 years old, lives in Boston, New York, Chicago “or one of the bigger cities in the West,” is a “technophile,” earns $75,000 a year, and has $100,000 in personal assets.

“COMMUNITY BANKS LOVE THAT PART OF THE BUSINESS—LENDING MONEY”


Radius’s performance since it went paperless has been stellar. The bank has seen a rapid rise in deposits, spurting to $782 million through the first quarter of 2017, up from $565 million at year-end 2014. With little fee income but ample deposits and low-cost funds, Radius realizes the bulk of its revenues – and profits — on the interest-rate spread generated from its loan portfolio.

The bank booked $43.5 million in SBA loans last year, ranking it in the top 50 banks on the SBA’s league tables, while carrying another $105 million in its commercial leasing business at the end of the first quarter this year. Loan generation is driving asset growth, which are currently at $973 billion, up more a third from $726 million in 2014, and Butler expects the bank’s assets to top $1 billion sometime this year.

“Community banks love that part of the business—lending money,” Butler says.