FCC Issues Citations for Insufficient TCPA Disclosures

| By:


no robodialingThe FCC recently issued telemarketing citations against First National Bank and Lyft, Inc., a ride-sharing service. The Commission cited the companies for requiring their customers to consent to receiving auto-dialed calls and texts as a condition of using the companies’ services. The FCC alleged that the companies’ requirements violated regulations issued pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act that forbid companies from requiring their customers to agree to receive marketing robocalls and auto-dialed calls/texts as a condition of purchasing any goods, services, or property. The citations demonstrate the Commissions’ intent to actively enforcing the TCPA and its regulations.

In light of the FCC citations, small business lenders that engage in telemarketing sales –especially to cellphones – should review their TCPA disclosures. In particular, companies need to ensure they obtain “prior express written consent” before engaging in auto-dialed calls/texts to mobile numbers. And as the FCC noted, the requirements are exacting:

The agreement must be in writing;

The agreement must bear the signature of the person who will receive the advertisement/telemarketing calls or texts;

The language of the agreement must clearly authorize the caller to deliver or cause to be delivered advertisements or telemarketing messages via auto-dialed calls, texts, or robocalls;

The written agreement must include the telephone number to which the person signing authorizes advertisements or telemarketing messages to be delivered; and

The written agreement must include a clear and conspicuous disclosure informing the person signing that:

  • By executing the agreement, the person signing authorizes the caller to deliver or cause to be delivered ads or telemarketing messages via auto-dialed calls, texts, or robocalls; and
  • The person signing the agreement is not required to sign the agreement (directly or indirectly), or agree to enter into such an agreement as a condition of purchasing any property, goods, or services.

In the event that consent is disputed, it is the caller that bears the burden of “demonstrating that a clear and conspicuous disclosure was provided and that unambiguous consent was obtained.”

While the citations do not carry monetary penalties, the FCC may impose sanctions against First National and Lyft if the violations continue. The citations also invite the filing of private TCPA actions against the companies. All the more reason for small business lenders to conduct a proactive review of their TCPA compliance procedures.

Last modified: April 19, 2019
Patrick SiegfriedPatrick Siegfried is the author of usurylawblog.com and smallbusinessfinancelaw.com. Patrick is a practicing attorney in Bethesda, Maryland. Patrick’s work focuses on issues regarding alternative small business financing. He can be reached at psiegfried@usurylawblog.com
Related:

Category: Legal Briefs

Home Legal Briefs › FCC Issues Citations for Insufficient TCPA Disclosures


    Meridian Leads

    Avanza Capital

    Torro

    AMA Recovery

    Green Note Capital

    Austin LLP

    deBanked CONNECT MIAMI

    Unique Funding Solutions

    Forward Financing

    Velocity Capital Group

    Splash Advance

    ROK Financial

    Arsenal

    Cloudsquare

    National Funding

    SOS Capital

    Big Think Capital

    Amerifi Capital

    Symplifi Capital

    Paz Funding Source

    IOU Financial

    Total Merchant Resources

    Hunter Caroline

    FundFi

    Highland Hill Capital

    Smart Business Funding

    Pearl Capital