How The PPP Reporting Oversight Harms MCA Companies

David Roitblat is the founder and CEO of Better Accounting Solutions, an accounting firm based in New York City, and a leading authority in specialized accounting for merchant cash advance companies.To connect with David or schedule a call about working with Better Accounting Solutions, email david@betteraccountingsolutions.com.

deBanked’s recent story covering the news about how the Small Business Administration (SBA) failed to report many Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan charge-offs to credit agencies is a major concern for merchant cash advance companies.

As the deBanked article explained, a new report from the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) found that the SBA did not report 37% of PPP loan charge-offs, and missed deadlines 97% of the time. The OIG report stated that the SBA’s automated system was supposed to report these loans, but it did not always work correctly. As a result, many delinquent borrowers could still get new loans because their bad debt wasn’t reported. The report also pointed out that a large portion of early PPP loan charge-offs were linked to potential fraud, which makes the lack of reporting even more serious.

This oversight could cause real problems for our industry. As an accountant working with MCA companies for over a decade, I understand firsthand how important accurate credit reporting is for making sound and fully informed decisions on which merchants our clients choose to invest in and help advance.

For MCA companies, this incomplete reporting leaves a critical gap in the information that funders rely on. Without accurate credit information, it’s harder to assess the risk of advancing capital to any particular merchant, which can lead to higher chances of defaults and financial losses when you don’t have a complete history that includes any times they’d skipped payments or defaulted. The missing data from the SBA means MCA companies might unknowingly fund high-risk businesses, which ultimately harms the cash advance company itself.

To work through this situation, funders need to take stock of how they evaluate prospective merchants to work with.

First, it’s important to do thorough background checks using multiple sources of information. Relying on just one credit report isn’t enough, especially now that we know there might be gaps. Cross-referencing data from various sources will provide a more complete picture of a merchant’s credit history.

We can also require merchants to provide more documentation and financial information before approving funding deals, removing a complete reliance on credit reporting agencies that have now proven themselves fallible. Pairing up the complete history that they provide along with their credit reports, and continuous tracking of the deal on a strong internal MCA CRM that lets you know of any hiccups, is a proactive approach that helps in making informed funding decisions.

It’s vital to develop strong risk management strategies. This might include setting stricter funding criteria, diversifying the types of businesses we lend to, and keeping enough reserves to cover potential losses. By being cautious and prepared, we can protect our companies from the financial risks posed by incomplete credit reporting, and eliminate our over reliance on that one source of information.

Let’s use this opportunity to ensure we are making the best funding decisions possible, and continue to have healthy companies built on stable foundations.

David Roitblat is the founder and CEO of Better Accounting Solutions, an accounting firm based in New York City, and a leading authority in specialized accounting for merchant cash advance companies.

To connect with David, email david@betteraccountingsolutions.com.