Hmm. I'm not sure. From what I could tell, the P2P-Picks only uses 1%, 5%, and 25%, and any other value is irrelevant. So, I think that both of your filters would be doing the same thing, perhaps it is the redundancy that is causing issues?
I set it up to do the p2p-picks first, then to move on to a custom filter I created by looking through statistics.
Looking at the availability of the loans, it seems that they are getting funded faster than they can be created, which makes me think that riskier loans will be brought to the playing field as the demand increases.
I'm wondering what people think about this. Is it more reliable, and/or a faster execution, to use the automated investing option through Lending Club, instead of using the third party options? I saw somewhere that BlueVestment was getting delayed data for when loans posted. It would seem that the automated investing tool, along with some personal saved filters in the Lending Club website. What do other people think?