Clicky

  • Welcome to P2P Lending / NFT Lending Forum.
 

ETH.LOAN

News:

This was the original Lend Academy peer-to-peer lending forum, since forensically restored by deBanked and now reintroduced to eth.loan.

To restore access to your user account, email [email protected]. We apologize for errors you may experience during the recovery.

Main Menu
NEW LOANS:   | 870.eth 2.500 Ξ | 804.eth 2.500 Ξ | remoraid.eth 0.299 Ξ | ALL

Value of previously late notes

Started by Peter, June 25, 2014, 11:00:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

joshmer

Just a question for anyone out there to throw some thoughts around.   I recently started to reprice my notes that have had a late payment before and are now current.   I figured that 95% of principle balance would be a good place to start with notes that have a downward trending FICO, but I'm been surprised to see the large portion of my notes selling quickly.   Has anyone done an analysis the value of a note going late at least one time?  Outside of lending club's cure rates I didn't see a post on true statistics around notes having further payment issues.

Thanks!

yojoakak

There's plenty of never-late notes for sale right around par so I'm not sure why anyone would bother taking a chance on a 5% discount.

Ah well. The Wisdom of the Market I guess.

Fred

Some statistics on Current notes on FOLIOfn as of tonight (4/20):

https://forum.lendacademy.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FoAWQMaq.png&hash=17b17a44544b86e6f775a4b796f5fc44" alt="" class="bbc_img" />

https://forum.lendacademy.com/index.php?topic=2243.msg19259#msg88888888Quote"> from: joshmer on April 20, 2014, 05:52:35 PM

rawraw

Is that how your model determines the selling price for FolioFN strategy?

merits

generally, I don't think it is easy to sell now-current notes with a premium.
The average above is the average by listing, not the average sale price of the market.




core

Fred those statistics are nice to look at, but I don't see how examining what's currently listed can give you confident purchasing data.  You're only looking at what hasn't sold, and none of that which sold quickly.  Also it seems to me that your data would be seriously skewed by just a few people who list things at unrealistically high prices with no intention of selling the notes except to fools.  This increases your max markup, increases the avg, (MAYBE changes your purchasing, depending on how you have it set up) but the real market hasn't changed one bit.







NEW LOANS:   | 870.eth 2.500 Ξ | 804.eth 2.500 Ξ | remoraid.eth 0.299 Ξ | ALL