Skip to main content
Skip this menu

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - SMWinnie

[1]
1
Investors - LC / New Platform
« on: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM »
Well I, for one, love the new interface.

The landing page used to show me how much interest I have been paid and how much principal I have written off or down. Now I need to bounce from screen to screen to see that 71.4% of my interest has been burned off through writeoffs and writedowns.

Also, since the sortable list of notes no longer displays portfolio, I'm saving the time I used to waste characterizing loans as troubled, re-performing, etc. That should be a real time-saver!
3
Investors - LC / Lending Club Collection Actions
« on: May 25, 2017, 11:00:00 PM »
Apologies if I missed this, but does Lending Club provide any summary data on whether/when/how often it pursues defaulting borrowers and recovery rates?

I'm wondering if LC is starting to get a larger proportion of borrowers gaming them by borrowing before a planned default. It would be nice to see if default after 0/1/2 payments has increased through 2016 and into 2017.
4
Investors - LC /
« on: March 03, 2017, 12:00:00 AM »
Link to a nice explanation for why a time-weighted rate of return can be negative for a gain or positive for a loss.

The basic idea is that time-weighted rates of return abstract away from account size. Put another way, a time-weighted rate of return presumes that you had the same amount invested at all times. If, for instance, one has good returns on a relatively smaller amount of money and then bad returns on a larger amount of money, one might have a dollar loss with a positive rate of return.

OP (mrwhizzard) indicates a single deposit. If there were no withdrawals and no Folio purchases, then my guess is that: (1) OP's portfolio had modest gains; (2) OP reinvested the gains; and (3) OP's portfolio then suffered losses on the larger balance that more than offset the original gains.

Here's a quick, extreme hypothetical for illustration:
  • Invest $1000.
  • Portfolio doubles in first year.
  • Portfolio loses 55% in second year.
  • New balance is $900 for a 10% loss...
  • ...but the time-weighted rate of return is a little over 20%.
LC's discussion of their formula suggests a couple of other anomalies, but the formula basically looks sound. It accounts for the real cash flows, including LC's fees, and excludes accrued interest.
7
Investors - LC / Worst Month Yet
« on: November 29, 2016, 12:00:00 AM »
New "investor" here. I started an account with $8K of mad money about a month ago as an educational project. I wanted to see what a passive source of funds would experience, so I let LC auto-invest for me evenly split A/B/C/D.

I thought I would share the experience here, since this isolates mid-to-late October issuance. First month quality:

165  issued notes
  3  notes paid in full in first month
 22  notes have not reached 1st payment (or are processing/current)
  7  notes IGP


So, payment on 7 of the 140 notes which have come up on their first payment date failed.

Collection logs indicate most were NSF, but a couple of the logs showed no entry for the type of payment failure. One collection log is completely blank.
[1]