1 00:00:05.670 --> 00:00:08.520 Sean Murray: All right. Well, welcome back. My name is Sean 2 00:00:08.520 --> 00:00:11.880 Murray with deBanked. I am the president and Chief Editor. And 3 00:00:11.880 --> 00:00:17.430 today we're going to talk about what makes a good ISO. Last time 4 00:00:17.430 --> 00:00:20.430 we talked about what makes a good funder and it was all about 5 00:00:20.430 --> 00:00:24.840 what ISOs are looking for and funder. A new thread was posted 6 00:00:24.840 --> 00:00:28.080 on Daily Funder since then it was it was about what makes a 7 00:00:28.080 --> 00:00:32.610 good ISO. And I thought it was an interesting question. Because 8 00:00:32.670 --> 00:00:38.790 it just goes to show how complex commercial finance can be. And 9 00:00:38.790 --> 00:00:41.400 if you're a regulator out here, and you're watching this, I hope 10 00:00:41.400 --> 00:00:45.390 that you understand that the intricacies of a small business 11 00:00:45.390 --> 00:00:49.650 finance is a lot more than just evaluating the customer. It's 12 00:00:49.680 --> 00:00:54.090 also analyzing the broker or the referral source, believe it or 13 00:00:54.090 --> 00:00:58.080 not, and three things that go into it are responsiveness, 14 00:00:58.530 --> 00:01:05.670 trust, and knowing who your who your partners are. And the the 15 00:01:05.670 --> 00:01:10.170 post on Daily Funder actually got a lot more responses. And 16 00:01:10.170 --> 00:01:13.920 what makes a good ISO, versus what makes a good funder. 17 00:01:14.250 --> 00:01:17.760 Apparently, funders had a lot to say about what makes a good ISO. 18 00:01:18.900 --> 00:01:21.720 It's actually a topic I know a little bit about, because they 19 00:01:21.720 --> 00:01:27.690 used to be an underwriter. And believe it or not, how you feel 20 00:01:27.840 --> 00:01:31.950 about the broker plays a role and whether or not the deal gets 21 00:01:31.950 --> 00:01:36.240 completed, or not just one deal, but a whole bunch of deals. And 22 00:01:36.240 --> 00:01:38.970 the first thing that really came to mind was responsiveness. And 23 00:01:38.970 --> 00:01:41.610 this was one of the things that was mentioned in the thread on 24 00:01:41.610 --> 00:01:44.490 Daily Funder itself, if you're a funder, and when we're talking 25 00:01:44.490 --> 00:01:46.920 about funders, we're really talking about underwriters, 26 00:01:46.980 --> 00:01:49.920 right? Because the underwriters are the ones who have to work on 27 00:01:49.920 --> 00:01:53.580 the deals themselves. So the underwriters are really what we 28 00:01:53.580 --> 00:01:57.690 mean by funders. And if you're an underwriter, and we're 29 00:01:57.690 --> 00:02:03.360 talking about responsiveness, we're trying to think about, not 30 00:02:03.360 --> 00:02:09.120 just how accessible a broker can be, but also whether or not they 31 00:02:09.120 --> 00:02:14.220 can get the information that the underwriter is looking for. So 32 00:02:14.220 --> 00:02:16.590 if you're, if you're underwriting a file, and you 33 00:02:16.590 --> 00:02:20.160 need bank statements in a multi day bank, and you're trying to 34 00:02:20.160 --> 00:02:22.530 get it from the merchant, you're hoping that the broker is going 35 00:02:22.530 --> 00:02:25.650 to do it for you. And the worst thing that a, an underwriter can 36 00:02:25.650 --> 00:02:30.990 have a broker who doesn't care. Who doesn't understand why, or 37 00:02:30.990 --> 00:02:34.800 is making a big fuss about it. So that's, that's a big, that's 38 00:02:34.800 --> 00:02:37.440 a big thing for underwriters. And they take these as signals 39 00:02:37.740 --> 00:02:40.620 as to how they feel about you, and how they're going to feel 40 00:02:40.620 --> 00:02:44.040 about working with you on your future deals. In all these 41 00:02:44.040 --> 00:02:47.910 little signals, they factor in to how that relationship is 42 00:02:47.910 --> 00:02:51.570 gonna play out. And it goes into trust, which is probably the 43 00:02:51.570 --> 00:02:56.040 number two most important thing does the underwriter trust you? 44 00:02:57.120 --> 00:03:02.910 And it's kind of interesting to think about. If you're the 45 00:03:02.910 --> 00:03:07.050 merchant, and you apply for financing, you're worried about 46 00:03:07.050 --> 00:03:10.140 whether or not the underwriter is going to trust you with their 47 00:03:10.680 --> 00:03:14.670 money. But you probably don't think about whether or not the 48 00:03:14.670 --> 00:03:17.820 underwriter is going to trust the broker that you're working 49 00:03:17.820 --> 00:03:22.830 with. And believe it or not, it plays a big role.And there are a 50 00:03:22.830 --> 00:03:28.740 lot of different things that go into trust, I think, a very, 51 00:03:28.740 --> 00:03:31.260 very important one is whether or not you're upfront and 52 00:03:31.260 --> 00:03:35.970 transparent about the application that you bring. If 53 00:03:35.970 --> 00:03:39.150 there's any issues with the deal, they want to know that the 54 00:03:39.150 --> 00:03:42.330 broker is going to tell them right out of the gate, they 55 00:03:42.330 --> 00:03:45.390 don't want to find out at the end of the deal, right before it 56 00:03:45.390 --> 00:03:48.480 funds or right before gets declined, that you as the broker 57 00:03:48.480 --> 00:03:52.200 knew something the whole time and withheld that information. 58 00:03:52.740 --> 00:03:55.800 And if you're a broker, I kind of get it right because you're 59 00:03:55.800 --> 00:03:58.440 thinking, hey, well, it's the underwriters job to figure 60 00:03:58.440 --> 00:04:01.950 things out on their own. You're just the broker. If the if the 61 00:04:02.190 --> 00:04:05.250 underwriter approves the deal may miss something that's their 62 00:04:05.250 --> 00:04:08.460 fault. But really, the underwriter is kind of depending 63 00:04:08.460 --> 00:04:12.180 on you to an extent. And so they need to have some trust in you 64 00:04:12.390 --> 00:04:15.360 that you're doing everything on the up and up. Because if the 65 00:04:15.360 --> 00:04:18.870 deal doesn't perform, it's going to come back on the underwriter 66 00:04:19.110 --> 00:04:21.570 and then the underwriter is probably going to blame you. And 67 00:04:21.570 --> 00:04:23.910 so they're they're kind of trusting that you're going to 68 00:04:23.910 --> 00:04:27.060 tell them what they need to know, because the broker is the 69 00:04:27.060 --> 00:04:29.280 one managing the client relationship. From the very 70 00:04:29.280 --> 00:04:33.750 beginning. It's important to know that underwriters don't 71 00:04:33.960 --> 00:04:36.870 always make commission or don't really have performance 72 00:04:36.870 --> 00:04:41.190 incentives. And when they don't, right, and they're not judged, 73 00:04:41.760 --> 00:04:45.870 and they're not judged on their performance of the deal. Or 74 00:04:45.870 --> 00:04:50.220 they're not judged on the decisions that they make. They 75 00:04:50.220 --> 00:04:53.790 can kind of create little subconscious biases about who 76 00:04:53.790 --> 00:04:58.140 they like and who they don't like, at the end of the day. And 77 00:04:58.140 --> 00:05:00.180 so if you're a broker, you want to be one of those people that 78 00:05:00.180 --> 00:05:04.170 are subconsciously liked and being trustworthy is a good way 79 00:05:04.590 --> 00:05:09.930 to make that happen. And then another, another factor is 80 00:05:09.930 --> 00:05:11.940 definitely limiting your outlets, probably the number one 81 00:05:11.940 --> 00:05:15.060 thing that was talked about on the Daily Funder thread is a 82 00:05:15.060 --> 00:05:19.020 funder really does not like when you were shotgunning, a pile out 83 00:05:19.050 --> 00:05:21.990 to 100 different sources, and you happen to be one of them. 84 00:05:23.370 --> 00:05:27.420 The reason is because a lot of time can be spent analyzing a 85 00:05:27.420 --> 00:05:30.960 deal that has virtually no chance of going forward on 86 00:05:30.960 --> 00:05:35.940 account of you having submitted it to 99 other sources. And so 87 00:05:35.940 --> 00:05:38.100 what they put in all this work, and they're like, hey, I need 88 00:05:38.100 --> 00:05:41.520 this, this and this. And they literally spend not only time 89 00:05:41.550 --> 00:05:45.090 they spend money, right? They have to check credit. They're 90 00:05:45.090 --> 00:05:48.090 doing you know, background checks, those things cost money. 91 00:05:48.930 --> 00:05:52.440 And then they find out you, you got it funded with a competitor. 92 00:05:54.120 --> 00:05:57.180 Well, that for them is just a waste of time, right? They're 93 00:05:57.180 --> 00:06:00.420 like, Well, hopefully we'll get the next one. And if the same 94 00:06:00.420 --> 00:06:02.040 thing happens again, they're like, Well, hopefully the next 95 00:06:02.040 --> 00:06:05.280 one. And it comes down to eventually being like, well, 96 00:06:05.280 --> 00:06:07.410 what's it going to take for these deals to close? If you're 97 00:06:07.410 --> 00:06:09.750 just sending it out to 100? People? Are you sending us the 98 00:06:09.750 --> 00:06:13.650 right deals? Or are you just using us to analyze credit or 99 00:06:13.650 --> 00:06:17.130 you just, you know, want to have us is one of your 100 backup 100 00:06:17.130 --> 00:06:21.000 options. Nobody wants to be like that, happened to me a long time 101 00:06:21.000 --> 00:06:25.980 ago. We had a situation, this is more than 10 years ago. But we 102 00:06:25.980 --> 00:06:29.520 had a situation where I was an underwriter and a broker was 103 00:06:29.520 --> 00:06:32.040 submitting deals. And I think out of like 100 and, you know, 104 00:06:32.100 --> 00:06:37.380 304 deals, we funded one and it was a tiny deal. And, you know, 105 00:06:37.380 --> 00:06:40.290 I as the underwriter was asked by the funding company, what's 106 00:06:40.290 --> 00:06:44.790 going on? They thought it was because of me. And I said, No, I 107 00:06:44.790 --> 00:06:47.310 probably approved more than half but then we never heard 108 00:06:47.310 --> 00:06:49.950 anything, and there was no follow up. And I'm not really 109 00:06:49.950 --> 00:06:52.050 even sure what happened to the deals. Turns out, they were just 110 00:06:52.050 --> 00:06:56.280 being funded by another company. And I believe the term that was 111 00:06:56.280 --> 00:06:59.520 used to describe that experience was it was kind of like an 112 00:06:59.520 --> 00:07:02.490 academic exercise. It was like, Hey, here's 100 plus deals to 113 00:07:02.490 --> 00:07:05.250 underwrite. None of them are gonna fund but you know, what 114 00:07:05.250 --> 00:07:07.530 would you do in these circumstances? Don't worry, 115 00:07:07.710 --> 00:07:10.380 they'll never happen in real life. That's literally what was 116 00:07:10.410 --> 00:07:13.620 what was happening. Here. I was doing those underwriting, and 117 00:07:13.620 --> 00:07:16.710 then nothing ever got funded. And then I as the underwriter 118 00:07:16.710 --> 00:07:19.290 even though I wasn't compensated on essentially, on my 119 00:07:19.290 --> 00:07:22.320 performance, it looked like I wasn't doing anything, you do 120 00:07:22.320 --> 00:07:24.270 have to fund deals, if you're an underwriter, you can't decline 121 00:07:24.270 --> 00:07:29.730 everything. And so that really impacted how I was building the 122 00:07:29.730 --> 00:07:32.970 company. And then I looked on very unfavorably upon that 123 00:07:32.970 --> 00:07:35.820 broker. And then when that broker was really anxious about 124 00:07:35.820 --> 00:07:38.160 me finding a deal, after all those deals that we weren't 125 00:07:38.160 --> 00:07:41.910 getting done, all of a sudden, I didn't really trust that person. 126 00:07:42.090 --> 00:07:45.090 Because why are you so into this one deal at the last 100 he 127 00:07:45.090 --> 00:07:47.130 didn't care about now, I feel like there's something wrong 128 00:07:47.130 --> 00:07:49.980 with the deal. And you're trying to trick me into doing so into 129 00:07:49.980 --> 00:07:53.490 funding it. And no under, no underwriter wants to feel like 130 00:07:53.490 --> 00:07:56.430 they're in that position. They want to be able to trust you, 131 00:07:56.640 --> 00:07:59.280 and they want to be able to rely on you. And when things go wrong 132 00:07:59.280 --> 00:08:01.560 with the deal, even after they're funded, there's a level 133 00:08:01.560 --> 00:08:04.980 of confidence in knowing that the broker cares after the deal 134 00:08:05.160 --> 00:08:09.060 to do something as well, because the funding company, the owners, 135 00:08:09.060 --> 00:08:10.770 whoever the investors gonna say, they're gonna go to the 136 00:08:10.770 --> 00:08:13.320 underwriter and say, you know, what's, what happened with this 137 00:08:13.320 --> 00:08:17.460 deal, it looks like it's going sideways. And it's one thing for 138 00:08:17.460 --> 00:08:20.520 you to do all you can to try to get it back on track. But it's 139 00:08:20.520 --> 00:08:22.920 also very helpful when you know, the broker is going to be there 140 00:08:22.920 --> 00:08:26.070 too. And then if the broker is doing those things, well, 141 00:08:26.070 --> 00:08:28.200 there's a good chance that the next time that broker submits 142 00:08:28.200 --> 00:08:30.240 the deal, that underwriter is going to look a little bit more 143 00:08:30.240 --> 00:08:36.570 favorably upon doing it. And it's all really feeds into, 144 00:08:37.170 --> 00:08:40.620 again, what I said at the beginning, about how it's a lot 145 00:08:40.620 --> 00:08:44.550 more than just the underwriter judging the merchant, the 146 00:08:44.550 --> 00:08:46.860 merchants want to think it's just about them, whether or not 147 00:08:46.860 --> 00:08:51.570 they were credit worthy, trustworthy, you know, they look 148 00:08:51.570 --> 00:08:55.020 sustainable or whatever. But at the end of the day, the 149 00:08:55.020 --> 00:08:57.420 underwriter is factoring in all these things I just mentioned, 150 00:08:57.510 --> 00:08:59.820 thinking about whether or not they can trust them. They're 151 00:08:59.820 --> 00:09:02.490 thinking about whether or not they got a lot of other deals 152 00:09:02.490 --> 00:09:05.310 that sent in funded, how those deals performed, what they did 153 00:09:05.310 --> 00:09:08.760 when things didn't go the way they wanted. And that's what's 154 00:09:08.760 --> 00:09:11.250 being factored into the deal, too. So if you're out there, and 155 00:09:11.250 --> 00:09:14.310 your regulator and you're listening to this, it's not as 156 00:09:14.310 --> 00:09:18.990 black and white as whether or not certain demographic factors 157 00:09:19.020 --> 00:09:22.470 contributed to whether or not the deal got funded. It's the 158 00:09:22.470 --> 00:09:25.590 chance and it could be subconscious. And it probably is 159 00:09:25.590 --> 00:09:30.300 mostly subconscious. But there is a bias in terms of who 160 00:09:30.300 --> 00:09:33.180 referred the deal to begin with. And so if you're saying, Well, 161 00:09:33.180 --> 00:09:36.240 two deals look equal, and one got approved, and one didn't. 162 00:09:36.480 --> 00:09:39.240 But what's the demographics one with a man, with a woman? You 163 00:09:39.240 --> 00:09:41.580 know, what kind of inference can we draw from that? I don't know 164 00:09:41.580 --> 00:09:43.920 that you can draw any inference until you look at how did the 165 00:09:43.920 --> 00:09:46.710 deals get submitted to you was one from a broker that the 166 00:09:46.710 --> 00:09:48.960 underwriter liked and one from a broker that the underwriter 167 00:09:49.020 --> 00:09:51.690 didn't like or one they trusted a lot when they didn't really 168 00:09:51.690 --> 00:09:55.800 trust that plays a role in all of it. And so you want to be the 169 00:09:55.800 --> 00:09:59.940 broker who had who has the trust, right? And I don't think 170 00:09:59.940 --> 00:10:03.480 that ever even been addressed when we're in the sense of 171 00:10:04.290 --> 00:10:08.790 regulation for how demographics should be evaluated. And I'm 172 00:10:08.790 --> 00:10:12.660 talking in particular about section 1071, of Dodd Frank, 173 00:10:12.660 --> 00:10:15.420 which is supposed to be carried out by the CFPB. They're the 174 00:10:15.420 --> 00:10:18.750 ones that are looking at demographic factors and small 175 00:10:18.750 --> 00:10:22.470 business lending. And it's never been brought up, that the broker 176 00:10:22.470 --> 00:10:24.990 or the referral source plays a role in whether or not a deal 177 00:10:24.990 --> 00:10:27.780 gets done. In consumer lending, you don't really have that you 178 00:10:27.780 --> 00:10:30.870 have somebody applies, the FICO score gets checked, and then 179 00:10:30.870 --> 00:10:33.510 they're wondering, they're wondering, or they're worrying 180 00:10:33.900 --> 00:10:38.400 about whether or not there were little, you know, intangible 181 00:10:38.430 --> 00:10:41.970 variables that impact whether or not somebody got approved, that 182 00:10:41.970 --> 00:10:44.280 could be deemed some sort of discriminatory, you know, 183 00:10:44.280 --> 00:10:48.150 variant. But here, here it could it, could it come down to the 184 00:10:48.150 --> 00:10:51.330 broker, they might not even thought about the applicant at 185 00:10:51.330 --> 00:10:55.530 all, if you can believe it, let's just say they funded 49 186 00:10:55.560 --> 00:10:58.950 out of last 50 deals and another deal comes in and they're like, 187 00:10:59.070 --> 00:11:01.500 you know, it's small, we like this broker, we're going to fund 188 00:11:01.500 --> 00:11:05.910 it, like, imagine now trying to be the CFPB. And trying to 189 00:11:05.910 --> 00:11:09.780 determine whether or not there was any discrimination at play, 190 00:11:09.780 --> 00:11:11.670 when it came to the applicant, it had nothing to do with the 191 00:11:11.670 --> 00:11:15.600 applicant, which is wild, but that's the way that's the way 192 00:11:15.600 --> 00:11:18.810 commercial finance and small business finance works. And if 193 00:11:18.810 --> 00:11:23.070 you're a broker, and you have, you have the issue where funders 194 00:11:23.070 --> 00:11:26.550 don't trust you, or you don't submit enough files for them to 195 00:11:26.550 --> 00:11:32.880 have belief in in how they work and operate with you. Well, it 196 00:11:32.880 --> 00:11:37.860 kind of brings up the whole, you know, idea of CO brokering, 197 00:11:38.070 --> 00:11:41.760 there are brokers out there, who try to convince other brokers to 198 00:11:41.760 --> 00:11:45.870 submit to them on account of, they can submit a deal to a 199 00:11:45.870 --> 00:11:50.250 funder and get and be more likely to get an approval, and 200 00:11:50.250 --> 00:11:52.860 then somebody else who the underwriter doesn't have a 201 00:11:52.860 --> 00:11:56.550 relationship with. And we hear about relationships all the 202 00:11:56.550 --> 00:11:59.160 time, I have a relationship with this company, I've a 203 00:11:59.160 --> 00:12:01.920 relationship with that company. And you should submit to me and 204 00:12:01.920 --> 00:12:04.320 ultimate to them because there's a higher chance of it getting 205 00:12:04.320 --> 00:12:08.190 approved. But guess what, that's a real thing. It's a real thing 206 00:12:08.190 --> 00:12:10.050 in business, finance, it's a real thing in commercial 207 00:12:10.050 --> 00:12:12.270 finance. And so if you're a broker and you're getting all 208 00:12:12.270 --> 00:12:15.570 your deals declined by a funder is notorious for high approvals? 209 00:12:15.750 --> 00:12:18.240 Well, it could be because they don't trust you. And so 210 00:12:18.240 --> 00:12:21.990 submitting your deals to a broker, who can then submit them 211 00:12:21.990 --> 00:12:25.140 on your behalf could increase those chances of it getting 212 00:12:25.140 --> 00:12:28.530 funded. Now, there should be transparency and where the deal 213 00:12:28.590 --> 00:12:30.960 originally originated from you don't want the funder to think 214 00:12:30.960 --> 00:12:36.660 that, you know, this, the original source is not who they 215 00:12:36.660 --> 00:12:42.390 say they are. But you know, it all it all like does make sense, 216 00:12:42.390 --> 00:12:44.370 the whole idea that once somebody could have a 217 00:12:44.370 --> 00:12:46.680 relationship that could impact the approvals, that's a real 218 00:12:46.680 --> 00:12:49.740 thing. And I know this from experience, not just not just 219 00:12:49.740 --> 00:12:53.790 from talking to people, there were brokers that we would 220 00:12:53.790 --> 00:12:57.480 actually meet with in person. And it actually, you know, I got 221 00:12:57.480 --> 00:13:01.380 to know what their character was. And I'm not saying that I 222 00:13:01.380 --> 00:13:06.030 then approve deals because I intentionally liked them. But 223 00:13:06.390 --> 00:13:09.180 maybe because there was some subconscious bias that I believe 224 00:13:09.180 --> 00:13:12.090 this person was trying to do the right thing, versus someone who 225 00:13:12.090 --> 00:13:14.100 I didn't know, who would send, you know, one or two deals a 226 00:13:14.100 --> 00:13:18.420 month and make a whole scene about it. And I felt like, I 227 00:13:18.420 --> 00:13:21.240 don't know, you know, maybe it's not worth it, right? Because 228 00:13:21.240 --> 00:13:23.880 what happens if we do it, and it goes bad, and I don't have any, 229 00:13:23.910 --> 00:13:26.850 any any leverage to to explain why I did it, you know, I don't 230 00:13:26.850 --> 00:13:29.100 have any relationship with you. I didn't know that if you were 231 00:13:29.100 --> 00:13:31.560 trustworthy or not. I didn't feel if you were trustworthy. 232 00:13:33.030 --> 00:13:35.490 And so that's actually that's actually a part of it. And I 233 00:13:35.490 --> 00:13:39.150 think it's going to continue to be a part of it for a good 234 00:13:39.150 --> 00:13:42.360 period of time, I know that there's a lot of FinTech now, 235 00:13:42.450 --> 00:13:45.960 and things are automated. But at the end of the day, even then 236 00:13:45.990 --> 00:13:49.350 people are analyzing where the deal flow is coming from, even 237 00:13:49.350 --> 00:13:53.640 if it's automated, and it's coming from a website. And this 238 00:13:53.640 --> 00:13:57.660 website is notoriously had a worse, higher default rate that 239 00:13:57.660 --> 00:14:02.220 never soars. They may go in and say, Well, you know, let's 240 00:14:02.250 --> 00:14:05.790 decline more of those deals, because they have a higher 241 00:14:05.790 --> 00:14:09.540 default rate for some reason, right? And they're judging the 242 00:14:09.540 --> 00:14:13.080 source of the deals and not judging the applicants on the 243 00:14:13.080 --> 00:14:17.550 deal. This, this happens. And they say the default rate from 244 00:14:17.550 --> 00:14:21.480 the source was too high, decrease their approval rate, or 245 00:14:21.480 --> 00:14:25.080 just turn them off altogether. And that can happen you can have 246 00:14:25.080 --> 00:14:27.300 funders decide they don't want to work with you; could be 247 00:14:27.300 --> 00:14:30.030 because they don't trust you, could be because you send in too 248 00:14:30.030 --> 00:14:32.700 little deal flow, could be because you're not responsive. 249 00:14:33.240 --> 00:14:35.220 Could be because you're just using them as one of 100 250 00:14:35.220 --> 00:14:39.330 companies to shotgun a file at and you can get terminated as an 251 00:14:39.330 --> 00:14:43.830 ISO and you may say also, so what you know, other than 99 252 00:14:43.830 --> 00:14:46.410 other companies. Well, there's other things to think about and 253 00:14:46.410 --> 00:14:49.830 that's whether or not your renewals will stay with you 254 00:14:49.860 --> 00:14:53.250 whether or not you'll get paid on those renewals. And whether 255 00:14:53.250 --> 00:14:56.340 or not your contract allows you to even move a deal somewhere 256 00:14:56.340 --> 00:15:00.450 else or continue to engage with those customers. You should 257 00:15:00.450 --> 00:15:03.840 really be thinking about long term relationships with all the 258 00:15:03.840 --> 00:15:07.770 companies you work with, which should be limited.It's pretty 259 00:15:07.770 --> 00:15:11.070 common for people to think about it in terms of having a, you 260 00:15:11.070 --> 00:15:14.160 know, A, B, C, D, E, F paper, whatever you want to call it, 261 00:15:14.370 --> 00:15:17.010 having a couple shops for a couple for your B couple years, 262 00:15:17.340 --> 00:15:22.080 you know, C, D and a couple for the garbage files. And it's okay 263 00:15:22.080 --> 00:15:24.150 to look at it from that standpoint. So if you work with 264 00:15:24.180 --> 00:15:27.990 10, funders, 10 isn't too much 10 lenders isn't too much, but 265 00:15:27.990 --> 00:15:31.230 100 is way too much. And so you could have two or three for 266 00:15:31.230 --> 00:15:33.960 your, for your premium quality paper, and you can have two or 267 00:15:33.960 --> 00:15:37.470 three for your bottom quality. That's okay, nobody's gonna fall 268 00:15:37.470 --> 00:15:39.660 to you. If you send your dealer to two or three companies like, 269 00:15:39.660 --> 00:15:41.940 hey, this looks like an A paper client. I'm going to send it out 270 00:15:41.940 --> 00:15:45.000 for two or three companies and see which one comes back with 271 00:15:45.030 --> 00:15:47.460 with the best deal. Nobody's faulting you for that. They're 272 00:15:47.460 --> 00:15:49.290 faulting you for when you send it out to 100 different 273 00:15:49.290 --> 00:15:52.200 companies, or you're sending them deals that clearly don't 274 00:15:52.200 --> 00:15:54.180 fit their parameters. Another thing you don't want to you 275 00:15:54.180 --> 00:15:57.660 don't want to mess up. And so, you know, these are all things 276 00:15:57.660 --> 00:16:00.660 that come into what a funder thinks about when an underwriter 277 00:16:00.660 --> 00:16:04.800 thinks about when they're working with a broker comes down 278 00:16:04.800 --> 00:16:08.280 to responsiveness, whether or not you're able to get the 279 00:16:08.280 --> 00:16:12.840 paperwork, in that you answer the underwriters questions and 280 00:16:12.840 --> 00:16:16.500 that you participate in the process. You can't just be 281 00:16:16.500 --> 00:16:23.190 absentee that they trust you trust being that, that you care 282 00:16:24.000 --> 00:16:26.730 that you're a good character, and that you're not withholding 283 00:16:26.820 --> 00:16:30.240 any information back from the underwriter and also limiting 284 00:16:30.270 --> 00:16:34.740 your outlets. They want to know that, that you that they are an 285 00:16:34.740 --> 00:16:39.180 important partner in your broker journey. they're okay with being 286 00:16:39.180 --> 00:16:42.000 one or two or three have a certain quality paper, but they 287 00:16:42.000 --> 00:16:46.830 don't want to be one of 100. And so if you're a broker, I know 288 00:16:46.830 --> 00:16:50.160 it's so easy to go out there and say here's what to look for in a 289 00:16:50.160 --> 00:16:53.610 funder. But as you can tell from the start on the daily funder 290 00:16:53.640 --> 00:16:56.820 bonders think the same way. Here's what I look for in an 291 00:16:56.820 --> 00:17:00.840 ISO. Here's what I look for in a broker. And that was our topic 292 00:17:00.870 --> 00:17:04.350 for today. So thank you very much for being here. And I'll 293 00:17:04.350 --> 00:17:06.630 see you next time. I'm Sean Murray with deBank