PIPE

This is a search result page






Related Headlines

04/09/2026Pipe raises $16M
12/14/2025Pipe's $2B valuation? Only $7M rev per year
11/18/2025Pipe lays off half its staff
04/15/2025Pipe acquires Glean.ai
06/11/2024Pipe secures $100M credit facility



Stories

Pipe Originated $300M in MCAs in Last Two Years, Bouncing Back

April 9, 2026
Article by:

pipePipe originated $300M in merchant cash advances in the last two years, the company revealed. The figure was presented in its announcement that it has raised a fresh $16M round of capital. The $300M in MCAs was spread across 15,000 merchants.

“Pipe has built the infrastructure that small business financing should have had from the start; AI-native, partner-embedded, and easily accessible for the tens of thousands of businesses that have been told for too long they’re not worthy of capital,” said Pipe CEO Claurelle Rakipovic in the official release. “Pipe has kept its ambition while operating with a clear focus on the customer and fiscal discipline. That combination puts us in a powerful position. This new capital gives us the fuel to move faster on what’s already working as we continue to create a better future for small businesses.”

Pipe’s funding volume is actually lower than it used to be. In 2021 they shared that they had originated $1.2B in MCAs in a single year. At the time Pipe marketed itself as the “Nasdaq for revenue” and called its employees “plumbers” instead of sales agents, underwriters, and engineers. After raising $300M at a $2 billion valuation, fintech reporter Jason Mikula shared that the company had generated only $7.1M in revenue in 2024. Layoffs followed.

The new announcement says that revenue tripled in 2025 and that its “embedded financing” product relaunched in 2024. With the $16M round and several new board members, the company appears to be on a corrective return back up.

And One of the Largest Small Business Funders is… Pipe?

December 22, 2021
Article by:

pipeIt’s not a loan, Pipe says. Instead businesses can sell their future recurring revenue to investors on a trading platform for cash upfront today. Led by CEO Harry Hurst, the former founder of a rental car delivery service, Pipe has provided an astounding $1.2B worth of capital to businesses this year, putting them on pace to become one of the largest small business finance companies nationwide.

The company claims to have made recurring revenue into an asset class while making Miami their home base, much to the joy of the city’s tech-friendly mayor.

Pipe considers itself to be the “Nasdaq for revenue” and calls its employees “plumbers” instead of sales agents, underwriters, and engineers.

Pipe has already raised $300 million of equity financing in the last year from investors including Shopify, Slack, Okta, HubSpot, Next47, Marc Benioff’s TIME Ventures, Alexis Ohanian’s Seven Seven Six, Chamath Palihapitiya, MaC Ventures, Fin VC, Greenspring Associates, Counterpoint Global (Morgan Stanley) and more at a valuation of over $2 billion.

“Pipe is levelling the playing field for companies in the capital markets,” said Chamath Palihapitiya, Founder & CEO, Social Capital, to finledger. “By taking the underlying contracts that generate recurring revenue streams and making them tradable for the first time, Pipe has unlocked a multi-trillion dollar asset class, revenue.”

FBI Seizes 84% of Colonial Pipeline Bitcoin Ransom

June 8, 2021
Article by:

pipelineA month after hackers shut down the Colonial Pipeline for a ransom of $4 million in bitcoin, the FBI got the majority of the money back.

Bitcoin, the digital currency idolized as free and far from the reaches of the government, was confiscated (some theorized “hacked”) this past week. The FBI took back $2.3M: half of the pipeline ransom. The Bureau followed the 75 bitcoins via the blockchain and, according to an affidavit uploaded by ABC News, seized the private key to the bitcoin account and took 63.7 bitcoin. Though the FBI secured 84.9% of the ransom in BTC, the crypto’s price is down to nearly half last month’s value.

Now, bitcoin enthusiasts like the editors at Decrypt will swear that there is no way the FBI could hack a private account that without the private key and account number, both long strings of numbers, the encryption makes it impossible to get in. But law enforcement could confiscate Bitcoin through other methods.

The blockchain is a ledger going back to the first block mined with all transactions perfectly traceable. With enough computer power, an agency can retrace steps hackers take and force the address owner to comply.

April Falcon Doss, executive director of the Institute for Technology Law and Policy at Georgetown Law, told NPR that while unlikely, there is even a theoretical possibility that the FBI outright hacked the private key.

But “The idea that the FBI would have, through some brute-force decryption activity, figured out the private key seems to be the least likely scenario,” She said. Still, a currency that is supposed to be “the future of finance” dropped more than 8% after the news that digital terrorists couldn’t rely on bitcoin for illegal activity.

Open Banking — A U.S. Pipe Dream or Near-Term Reality?

December 18, 2018
Article by:

This story appeared in deBanked’s Nov/Dec 2018 magazine issue. To receive copies in print, SUBSCRIBE FREE

open bankingSome alternative funders are anxious for “open banking” to become the gold standard in the U.S., but achieving widespread implementation is a weighty proposition.

Open banking refers to the use of open APIs (application program interfaces) that enable third-party developers to build applications and services around a financial institution. It’s a movement that’s been gaining ground globally in recent years. Regulations in the U.K., a forerunner in open banking, went into effect in January, while several other countries including Australia and Canada are at varying stages of implementation or exploration.

For the U.S., however, the time frame for comprehensive adoption of open banking is murkier. Industry participants say the prospects are good, but the sheer number of banks and the fragmented regulatory regime makes wholesale implementation immensely more complicated. Nonetheless, industry watchers see promise in the budding grass-roots initiative among banks and technology companies to develop data-sharing solutions. Regulators, too, have started to weigh in on the topic, showing a willingness to further explore how open banking could be applied in U.S. markets.

Open banking “is a global phenomenon that has great traction,” says Richard Prior, who leads open banking policy at Kabbage, an alternative lender that has been active in encouraging the industry to develop open banking standards in the U.S. “It’s incumbent upon the U.S. to be a driver of this trend,” he says.

The stakes are particularly high for alternative lenders since they rely so heavily on data to make informed underwriting decisions. Open banking has the potential to open up scores of customer data and significantly improve the underwriting process, according to industry participants.

“Open banking massively enables alternative lending,” says Mark Atherton, group vice president for Oracle’s financial services global business unit. What’s missing at the moment is the regulatory stick to ensure uniformity. Certainly, data sharing is gradually becoming more commonplace in the U.S. as banks and fintech companies increasingly explore ways to collaborate. But even so, banks in the U.S. are currently all over the map when it comes to their approach to open banking, posing a challenge for many alternative lenders. Many alternative lenders would like to see regulators step in with prescriptive requirements so that open banking becomes an obligation for all banks, as opposed to these decisions being made on a bank-by-bank basis. Especially since many consumers want to be able to more readily share their financial information, they say.

“It will create huge value to everyone if that data is more accessible,” says Eden Amirav, co-founder and chief executive of Lending Express, an AI-powered marketplace for business loans.

The Great Divide


Some global-minded banks like Citibank have been on the forefront of open banking initiatives. Spanish banking giant BBVA is also taking a proactive approach. In October, the bank went live in the U.S. with its Banking-as-a-Service platform, after a multi-month beta period. Also in October, JPMorgan Chase announced a data sharing agreement with financial technology company Plaid that will allow customers to more easily push banking data to outside financial apps like Robinhood, Venmo and Acorns.

There are several other examples of open banking in action. Kabbage customers, for instance, authorize read-only access to their banking information to expedite the lending process through the company’s aggregator partners, says Sam Taussig, head of global policy at Kabbage.

A Global View

Also, companies such as Xero and Mint routinely interface with banks to put customers in control of their financial planning. And companies like Plaid and Yodlee connect lenders and banks to help with processes such as asset and income verification.

Some banks, however, are more reticent than others when it comes to data sharing. And with no regulatory requirements in place, it’s up to individual banks how to proceed. This can be nettlesome for alternative lenders trying to get access to data, since there’s no guarantee they will be able to access the breadth of customer data that’s available. “As an underwriter, you want the whole financial picture, and if data points are missing, it’s hard to make appropriate lending decisions,” Taussig says.

THERE’S A FEELING AMONG SOME COMMUNITY BANKS, THAT “IF I MAKE IT EASIER FOR MY SMALL BUSINESS CUSTOMERS TO GET LOANS ELSEWHERE, I’M DONE.”


The problem can be particularly acute among smaller banks, industry participants say. While the quality of data you can get from one of the money-center banks is quite good, “as you go down the line, it becomes a little less consistent,” says James Mendelsohn, chief operating officer of Breakout Capital Finance. For these smaller banks, the issue is sometimes one of control. There’s a feeling among some community banks, that “if I make it easier for my small business customers to get loans elsewhere, I’m done,” says Atherton of Oracle.

Absent regulatory requirements, alternative lenders are hoping that this initial hesitation among some banks changes over time as they continue to gain a better understanding of the market opportunity and as more of their counterparts become open to data sharing through APIs.

Open banking could be a boon for banks in that it would enable them to service customers they probably couldn’t before, says Jeffrey Bumbales, marketing director at Credibly, which helps small and mid-size businesses obtain financing. Open banking makes for a “better customer experience,” he says.

Challenges to Adoption


One challenge for the U.S. market is the hodgepodge of federal and state regulators that makes reaching a consensus a more arduous task. It’s not as simple here as it may be in other markets that are less fragmented, observers say.

Major rule-making would be involved, and there are many issues that would need attention. One pressing area of regulatory uncertainty today is who bears the liability in the event of a breach—the bank or the fintech, says Steve Boms, executive director of the Northern American chapter of the Financial Data and Technology Association. Existing regulations simply don’t speak to data connectivity issues, he says.

To be sure, policymakers have started to give these matters more serious attention, with various regulators weighing in, though no regulator has issued definitive requirements. Still, some industry participants are encouraged to see regulators and policymakers taking more of an interest in open banking.

A recent Treasury Report, for example, notes that as open banking matures in the United Kingdom, “U.S. financial regulators should observe developments and learn from the British experience.” And, The Senate Banking Committee recently touched on the issue at a Sept. 18 hearing. Industry watchers say these developments are a step in the right direction, though there’s significant work needed, they say, in order to make open banking a pervasive reality.

“We’re seeing the pace and interest around these things picking up pretty significantly,” Boms says. Even so, it can take several years to implement a formal process. “The hope is obviously as soon as possible, but the financial services sector is a very fragmented market in terms of regulation. There’s going to have to be a lot of coordination,” Boms says.

Another challenge to overcome is customers’ willingness to use open banking. Many small business owners are more comfortable sending a PDF bank statement versus granting complete access to their online banking credentials, says Mendelsohn of Breakout Capital Finance. “There’s a lot more comfort on the consumer side than there is on the small business side. Some of that is just time,” he adds.

Certainly sharing financial data is a concern—even in the U.K. where open banking efforts are well underway. More than three quarters of U.K. respondents expressed concern about sharing financial data with organizations other than their bank, according to a recent poll by market research body, YouGov. This suggests that more needs to be done to ease consumers into an open banking ecosystem.

The topic of data security came up repeatedly at this year’s Money20/20 USA conference in Las Vegas. How to make people feel comfortable that their data is safe is a pressing concern, says Tim Donovan, a spokesman for Fundbox, which provides revolving lines of credit for small businesses. Clearly, it’s something the industry will have to address before open banking can really become a reality in the U.S., he says.

A Global View


Despite these challenges, many market watchers feel open banking in the U.S. is inevitable, given the momentum that’s driving adoption worldwide. Several countries have taken on open banking initiatives and are at varying states of implementation—some driven by industry, others by regulation. Here is a sampling of what’s happening in other regions of the world:

In the U.K., for example, the implementation process is ongoing and is expected to continually enhance and add functionality through September 2019, according to The Open Banking Implementation Entity, the designated entity for creating standards and overseeing the U.K’s open banking initiative.

At the moment, only the U.K.’s nine largest banks and building societies must make customer data available through open banking though other institutions have and continue to opt in to take part in open banking. As of September, there were 77 regulated providers, consisting of third parties and account providers and six of those providers were live with customers, according to the U.K. open banking entity.

In Europe, the second Payment Services Directive (PSD2) requires banks to open up their data to third parties. But implementation is taking longer than expected—given the large number of banks involved. By some opinions, open banking won’t really be in force in Europe until September 2019, when the Regulatory Technical Standards for open and secure electronic payments under the PSD2 are supposed to be in place.

In Australia, meanwhile, the country has adopted a phase-in process to take place over a period of several years through 2021. Starting in July 2019, all major banks will be required to make available data on credit and debit card, deposit and transaction accounts. Data requirements for mortgage accounts at major banks will follow by February 1, 2020. Then, by July 1 of 2020, all major banks will need to make available data on all applicable products; the remaining banks will have another 12 months to make all the applicable data available.

For its part, Hong Kong is also pushing ahead with plans for open banking. In July, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority published its open API framework for the local banking sector. There’s a multi-prong implementation strategy with the final phase expected to be complete by mid-2019.

Singapore, by contrast, is taking a different approach than some other countries by not enforcing rules for banks to open access to data. The Monetary Authority of Singapore has endorsed guidelines for Open Banking, but has expressed its preference to pursue an industry-driven approach as opposed to regulatory mandates.

Other countries, meanwhile, are more in the exploratory phases. In Canada, the government announced in September a new advisory committee for Open Banking, a first step in a review of its potential merits. And in Mexico, the county’s new Fintech Law requires providers to provide fair access to data, and regulators there are reportedly gung-ho to get appropriate regulations into place. Still other countries are also exploring how to bring open banking to their markets.

The U.S. Trajectory


The U.S. meanwhile, is on a slower course—at least for now. More banks are using APIs internally and have been exploring how they can work with third-party technology companies. Meanwhile, companies like IBM have been coming to market with solutions to help banks open up their legacy systems and tap into APIs. Other industry players are also actively pursuing ways to bring open banking to the market.

As for when and if open banking will become pervasive in the U.S., it’s anyone’s guess, but industry participants have high hopes that it’s an achievable target in the not-too-distant future.

Thus far, there has been little pressure for banks to adopt open banking policies, says Taussig of Kabbage. But this is changing, and things will continue to evolve as other countries adopt open banking and as pressure builds from small businesses and consumers in an effort to ensure the U.S. market stays competitive, he says. Open banking “is going to happen in the near future,” Taussig predicts.

Diversity of Products Within Revenue-Based Financing

March 30, 2026
Article by:

Revenue-based financing has become extremely popular; So popular that it’s spawned its own variations of products. Some are loans, some are not. Many of the terms in the public vernacular are simply colloquial. The details are instead in the individual contracts. Refer to those contracts to understand how something works. Loans are absolutely repayable while non-loans structured as purchases tend to not be. The loans tend to have a hard term length built in if a merchant’s sales are well below what was projected even if it was based on a percentage of sales. Below is a small snapshot of how products are marketed with a percentage-of-sales payment mechanism.

One thing is certain. The trend of relying on a merchant’s revenue to determine payments is rapidly expanding.

Product diversity in revenue-based financing

Sample of small business finance providers

Paid Via a % of Sales You Say?
Company What they call it Paid Via a % of Sales Loan Not a Loan
DoorDash Capital Merchant Cash Advance
Walmart Capital Merchant Cash Advance
eBay Seller Capital Merchant Cash Advance
Lightspeed Capital Merchant Cash Advance
Shopify Capital Merchant Cash Advance
Pipe Merchant Cash Advance
Wayflyer Merchant Cash Advance
Coalition of funders Revenue Based Financing
Founders First Capital Partners Revenue Based Financing
Washington State RBF Fund Revenue Based Financing
NYC Future Fund Revenue Based Financing
Clearco Cash Advance Partially
Square Loans Business Loan
Shopify Capital Business Loan
PayPal Working Capital Business Loan

That Fintech Business Loan Performance Should Help You: How Hansa is Giving Both Borrowers and Lenders a Powerful Tool

October 15, 2025
Article by:

“Business owners want to be reported on,” said Henry Magun, founder and CEO of Hansa. “When we do a lot of surveys around this and when we survey small business owners en masse, would they rather borrow from a provider that does report to the business credit bureaus or does not, 85% of business owners say that they would rather borrow from a provider that does report to the business credit bureaus.”

It’s a familiar story: small business borrows from a fintech lender, repays it perfectly, and later on down the road applies for financing elsewhere believing that their previous payment history will support an approval or more favorable terms, only to find out there’s no public record of it at all.

Henry Magun - Hansa
Henry Magun, Founder and CEO, Hansa

“We hear that all too often,” said Magun. “It’s a very common experience, and that is one of the reasons why we are extremely focused on not only building the back-end pipes to do the furnishment to the bureaus for the lenders and make that process effortless, but also creating a front-end product that makes it a transparent process for the SMBs.”

Hansa, headquartered in New York City, enables lenders to report payment history to the credit bureaus and access existing reports on their customers. The key here is that it’s business credit reporting, not personal. Although most people are familiar with Dun & Bradstreet, Experian and Equifax also have business bureaus specifically for business credit. There’s also consortium-based organizations such as the Small Business Finance Exchange, for example, that take in commercial credit data.

While term loans and cards for SMBs, two rapidly growing products in the fintech space, are their main focus, the Hansa platform can make reporting possible for just about anything.

“We realize that there is such a diversity of product-type in the SMB financing space,” Magun said. “Is it a term loan? Is it a card? Is it an MCA product? You know, are there daily payments, weekly payments, monthly payments? All across the board, we do it all.”

The benefits of reporting business credit are obvious. Lenders can claim that good performance will legitimately build business credit, borrowers benefit from actually building business credit, and lenders can rely on this highly relevant data to drive more informed decisions.

“It’s really about getting the fintech ecosystem towards the future in which companies are focused on supporting financial wellness, and we really view credit furnishment in the SMB space as core to that, ultimately being able to reliably build credit is extremely important for financial mobility, economic mobility because it enables people to [graduate] to bank products and things like that, and being able to take your history with you in order to progress. That’s really important for economic mobility.”

hansasOn the flipside, for lenders that have spent years fine-tuning algorithms to predict payment performance outside of traditional credit reports, one area that continues to remain cloaked in obscurity is payment performance with other fintech lenders. Alternative methods, at least within the fintech community, are commonly used to make a best-guess effort, such as employing automated tools to scan an applicant’s bank account deposits with a known list of lender names and then matching them to corresponding bank debits to predict the performance and status of those accounts. But even if one can assess with a high degree of confidence about how those credit lines are performing, it’s not exactly an official affirmation from the lender, and the transaction history might not go far back enough. Besides, these risk assessment methods are entirely personalized to the lender, and don’t necessarily give the business an asset (a universally recognized credit report), that it can furnish elsewhere and benefit from. A business could use a credit report for a trade line or a bank loan or in some other transaction where it could hold weight for them, for example.

“It really is a ‘rising tide raises all ships’ scenario in the sense that in a more mature ecosystem where there’s higher ubiquity of reporting, everyone benefits,” Magun said. “It helps all the funders and creditors on their underwriting processes, and it helps the business owners, the applicants, because it increases the portability of your credit history.”

The usefulness speaks for itself. Hansa, for example, has increased the number of reports that they’re furnishing data on by more than 400x since the beginning of this year. And the lenders can show off to their borrowers what they’re reporting and where it’s being reported to in any manner they wish.

“We’ve started to see really great traction amongst these various players, and we’re really excited to be working with them and it works,” said Magun.

Already they are seeing improved payment rates and increased engagement rates between the borrowers and lenders.

“It’s really powerful,” Magun said, “and SMBs really do care about being able to build their credit.”

Revenue Based Financing Continues to Spread at Global Pace

September 30, 2025
Article by:

uber eatsEarlier this month, Uber Eats joined the revenue-based financing movement by partnering with Pipe Capital.

Karl Hebert, Vice President of Global Commerce and Financial Services at Uber, said of it, “We are happy to team up with Pipe to bring working capital to Uber Eats. Restaurants are our partners at Uber, and the backbone of our communities, yet many struggle with access to capital.”

It’s an unsurprising step considering rival DoorDash rolled out a merchant cash advance program nearly four years ago, though Uber arguably began experimenting with MCAs nearly ten years ago. And Uber is hardly doing it just to do it. Uber, for example, rolled out Uber Eats Financing, a revenue based financing product in Mexico through a partnership with R2 this past January, which went so well that they also rolled it out in Chile months later.

In Chile with R2, the service is described as taking place entirely within the Uber Eats Manager App with a 5-minute application process and payments made automatically and deducted by a fixed percentage from sales made using the platform.

In the US with Pipe, it says that the Uber Eats App Manager will show capital offers from Pipe that are customized based on restaurant revenue, cash flow, and business performance.

Uber joins Amazon, Walmart, Shopify, Intuit, Stripe, DoorDash, PayPal, Square, GoDaddy, Wix, Squarespace and others in offering a revenue-based financing product.

Revenue-based financing as a product type is available in but not limited to the US, Canada, Mexico, Chile, UK, Germany, Ireland, Spain, South Africa, Nigeria, India, Hong Kong, Netherlands, Australia, Japan, Brazil, Singapore, and more.

Pathway Launches Automation Platform to Redefine Underwriting

September 4, 2025
Article by:

NEW YORK, NY — September 2025 — Pathway, a New York–based fintech company, is transforming how funders and brokers underwrite small business financing. By parsing and reconciling bank statements, auto-screening deals, and producing mathematically verifiable outputs, Pathway helps underwriting teams cut decision time from hours to minutes while improving accuracy and consistency.

The platform was built by underwriters, for underwriters. That perspective shapes everything from its clean summaries and deep audits to its configurable decision rules—designed to eliminate dead paper and accelerate deal flow without sacrificing accuracy.

“We aren’t just a document reader—we’re a decision engine,” said co-founder Andrew Bisch. “We automate the most tedious underwriting work, and let you retain full control of the deal.”

Pathway also extends beyond core parsing. The platform includes information on UCC filings, AI-powered business research, custom Gmail forwarding, and white-labeled deployment options. Every feature is backed by enterprise-grade security—including Okta-powered authentication, full audit trails on every file, and flexible deployment to AWS, Google Cloud, or Azure.

Highlights of Pathway’s capabilities include:

  • Statement Parsing & Reconciliation — Transactions, balances, and metadata reconciled to the penny, with anomalies flagged for audit-ready confidence.
  • Auto-Decisioning — Configurable rules that can instantly approve or deny deals.
  • Scalability — Support for teams of all sizes with no drop in output quality.
  • CRM & Email Pipeline Sync — Push clean data directly into existing pipelines and
    track deals without breaking workflow.

Already, Pathway underwrites 100M+ USD of monthly recurring revenue for SMBs across North America.

To see how Pathway can automate your underwriting without giving up control, book a demo or start a free trial at https://lendpathway.com.

Threads on deBanked


06-03-2026

Oil & Gas Invoice Factoring — Oilfield Contractors Funded in 24 Hours...
we specialize in invoice factoring exclusively for oil and gas service contractors — drilling, hot shot trucking, water hauling, wireline, flowb...
07-25-2023

MCA Sales Rep Needed...
we are hiring a sales rep for our mca division! this is a full-time position monday - friday, 8 am to 4 pm (arizona time) this position is commissio...




Found on DailyFunder:

11-28-2020

See Post...
pipeline. vs also has call routing which helps you stay on top of email opens etc., , if i had to choose just one id probably pick phoneburner but with both only being $280 monthly you might as well use the tools of both., , , vanillasoft cant pump out high call volume?...
11-27-2020

See Post...
pipeline. vs also has call routing which helps you stay on top of email opens etc., , if i had to choose just one id probably pick phoneburner but with both only being $280 monthly you might as well use the tools of both....
11-19-2020

See Post...
pipeline. i understand you not agreeing, but in my opinion, and many others like me- there is just no upside to charging additional fees. i'd rather have a book of clients that know i don't charge them anything other than what's on the contracts. its gotten me more referrals than you can imagine. to each his own, i just don't do it and i don't advise anyone just getting started in the space to do it either....